Forestd16b14_ESO wrote: »Forestd16b14_ESO wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »It's vague. Having a small number of dragons in hiding *might* work, either in Tamriel or a remote corner of Nirn or in some little plane of Oblivion. Generally speaking though, having lots of Dragons awake or having them out in full view would require a huge lore re-write. There is also the question of what the "Dragons" of Akavir might really mean.RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.
but wait I read in the forums earlier, that the lore is not complete about this and there still may be some dragons awake in this era
[snip]
I think your missing the fact that this was not a "friendly lore discussion" the OP was saying he wants dragons added and you all jumped down his throat with "lore this lore that"
You do know half the players play not only ESO but TES in general for the lore right??? Not even half more like 60% to 80% of the TES community players for lore.
Completely not true. Maybe people on the forums . But not at all close . Try 30% . I have so many real life friends that have played morrowind , oblivion and skyrim and none know what lore even is. You are a minority. Which is okay I'm not hating on what people like but to say 80% of players care about lore is the silliest thing I've heard today.
yea 30% of the TES community is into the TES lore ssuurree that's why there's hundreds of hours of reading material about lore, hundreds of web sites for TES lore, hundreds of youtube videos about the lore and good bit of RP guilds in ESO to do lore RP.
Point being no dragons cause that hundreds and hundreds of lore stuff proves over and over again no dragons in the 2nd era.
I would bet my life that is not true. On so many levels. Go into area chat tonight and say "who here cares about lore" I bet no one will even reply . I talk in voice chat almost 24/7 and hear the way people talk about the game and the lore discussion came up and no one even knew what lore was besides lorebooks. You are very very wrong and this is something im almost positively sure about which im usually never sure but this time im 100% sure the majority of the player base knows NOTHING about lore. That's like saying the majority of the witcher fans are hard core fans who are into the lore. Which isn't true. They sold what a million copies? Majority of the people who bought the game did because it came out and it looked cool. Just like with TESO . People saw an mmo for console or saw a elder scrolls mmo and after playing oblivion or skyrim they decided to give it a chance. Trust me you are a minority.
You probably should have just left the thread locked, honestly.ZOS_Tarina wrote: »This thread is now being re-opened for discussion. Several posts have been removed because of community rules violations.
We understand that people are going to disagree from time to time, but please remember to keep your comments respectful at all times on our forums, even when you disagree with others. Insults or other disruptive behavior do not help further discussion and can move a thread off topic quickly. We encourage sharing opinions, but we ask that they are constructively stated when doing so, as this will help keep the discussion on track. Thank you!
You probably should have just left the thread locked, honestly.ZOS_Tarina wrote: »This thread is now being re-opened for discussion. Several posts have been removed because of community rules violations.
We understand that people are going to disagree from time to time, but please remember to keep your comments respectful at all times on our forums, even when you disagree with others. Insults or other disruptive behavior do not help further discussion and can move a thread off topic quickly. We encourage sharing opinions, but we ask that they are constructively stated when doing so, as this will help keep the discussion on track. Thank you!
Shadesofkin wrote: »Players who want dragons are usually players who don't care about the actual Lore of the game. That's cool, I respect it, but I will always say no.
Dont go judging people that way... you dont know what I care or dont
they can make a thousand things to bring dragons to the game without having the lore broken... wait for it...
Shadesofkin wrote: »Players who want dragons are usually players who don't care about the actual Lore of the game. That's cool, I respect it, but I will always say no.
Dont go judging people that way... you dont know what I care or dont
they can make a thousand things to bring dragons to the game without having the lore broken... wait for it...
sir_buttersworth wrote: »I like the lore, but I'm no master of it. Could someone who is, answer me this?
Would it be lore-breaking to have, instead of dragons, those Daedric Titans tameable and used as pets and or mounts? I was wondering, because if it is possible, that might be a good compromise.
Pendrillion wrote: »sir_buttersworth wrote: »I like the lore, but I'm no master of it. Could someone who is, answer me this?
Would it be lore-breaking to have, instead of dragons, those Daedric Titans tameable and used as pets and or mounts? I was wondering, because if it is possible, that might be a good compromise.
To answer your question... No it would not be lore breaking. Also there is a source within Coldharbour that tells you how Molag Bals Titans came about.
I don't remember exactly what book it was from. But essentially a Dragon got captured and was the Ancestor for the Titans.
And then these dragons can attack every town the moment a player shows up. Vital npc merchants can recklessly charge into battle and permanently die out of the game. Maybe the dragons will actually be able to kill guards. We can make ridiculous looking armor from their corpses. My provisioner will make dragon soup. Dragons made Skyrim the worst elder scrolls game.
I still want those dragons... and I still think they will make a dlc with them