Shadesofkin wrote: »Players who want dragons are usually players who don't care about the actual Lore of the game. That's cool, I respect it, but I will always say no.
Indeed. This also applied to bringing back the Dwemer or the unaltered Falmer.RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.
And ZOS has to have permission for anything that might break lore. Ticking off a large segment of the fan-base for money might happen, but it would be a bone-headed move to have dragons appear in the 2nd Era or sell baby dragons in the crown store as has been requested in the past.they can say this... but I dont think they will keep this off so long... as dragons sells
tinythinker wrote: »Indeed. This also applied to bringing back the Dwemer or the unaltered Falmer.RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.And ZOS has to have permission for anything that might break lore. Ticking off a large segment of the fan-base for money might happen, but it would be a bone-headed move to have dragons appear in the 2nd Era or sell baby dragons in the crown store as has been requested in the past.they can say this... but I dont think they will keep this off so long... as dragons sells
The two ways to get around the lore-based prohibition to meeting Dragons, Dwemer, or unaltered Falmer and the like would be a "crisis point time-travel zone" (sending player-characters through time to a period of disarray and imminent destruction or decimation of the local culture or society so that people wouldn't remember or notice the strangers among them) or a "lost pocket of Oblivion zone" (some part of Tamriel got sucked into a timeless bubble and because of blah blah blah the inhabitants can never leave) but neither possibility has ever been put on the table. And that still doesn't include the dragon pets (thank the Divines).
Nope, I just don't like lore-breaking to bring in one of the least interesting races in Tamriel. Folks who want Dragons can get Skyrim really cheap with all DLC included.tinythinker wrote: »Indeed. This also applied to bringing back the Dwemer or the unaltered Falmer.RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.And ZOS has to have permission for anything that might break lore. Ticking off a large segment of the fan-base for money might happen, but it would be a bone-headed move to have dragons appear in the 2nd Era or sell baby dragons in the crown store as has been requested in the past.they can say this... but I dont think they will keep this off so long... as dragons sells
The two ways to get around the lore-based prohibition to meeting Dragons, Dwemer, or unaltered Falmer and the like would be a "crisis point time-travel zone" (sending player-characters through time to a period of disarray and imminent destruction or decimation of the local culture or society so that people wouldn't remember or notice the strangers among them) or a "lost pocket of Oblivion zone" (some part of Tamriel got sucked into a timeless bubble and because of blah blah blah the inhabitants can never leave) but neither possibility has ever been put on the table. And that still doesn't include the dragon pets (thank the Divines).
well... those are possible ways to bring them back... but there are others... And I truly believe they will make Dragons in the future... I dont know about dragon pets... but you have to be a realy bitter person to not love little dragon pets =P
RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.
So is that a NO to dragons in ESO or a NO to people looking up topics that have already been bludgeoned to death before starting a new thread on one of them?xenowarrior92eb17_ESO wrote: »RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.
let me put it simple... N.O.
tinythinker wrote: »Nope, I just don't like lore-breaking to bring in one of the least interesting races in Tamriel. Folks who want Dragons can get Skyrim really cheap with all DLC included.tinythinker wrote: »Indeed. This also applied to bringing back the Dwemer or the unaltered Falmer.RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.And ZOS has to have permission for anything that might break lore. Ticking off a large segment of the fan-base for money might happen, but it would be a bone-headed move to have dragons appear in the 2nd Era or sell baby dragons in the crown store as has been requested in the past.they can say this... but I dont think they will keep this off so long... as dragons sells
The two ways to get around the lore-based prohibition to meeting Dragons, Dwemer, or unaltered Falmer and the like would be a "crisis point time-travel zone" (sending player-characters through time to a period of disarray and imminent destruction or decimation of the local culture or society so that people wouldn't remember or notice the strangers among them) or a "lost pocket of Oblivion zone" (some part of Tamriel got sucked into a timeless bubble and because of blah blah blah the inhabitants can never leave) but neither possibility has ever been put on the table. And that still doesn't include the dragon pets (thank the Divines).
well... those are possible ways to bring them back... but there are others... And I truly believe they will make Dragons in the future... I dont know about dragon pets... but you have to be a realy bitter person to not love little dragon pets =P
Shadesofkin wrote: »Players who want dragons are usually players who don't care about the actual Lore of the game. That's cool, I respect it, but I will always say no.
tinythinker wrote: »Indeed. This also applied to bringing back the Dwemer or the unaltered Falmer.RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.And ZOS has to have permission for anything that might break lore. Ticking off a large segment of the fan-base for money might happen, but it would be a bone-headed move to have dragons appear in the 2nd Era or sell baby dragons in the crown store as has been requested in the past.they can say this... but I dont think they will keep this off so long... as dragons sells
The two ways to get around the lore-based prohibition to meeting Dragons, Dwemer, or unaltered Falmer and the like would be a "crisis point time-travel zone" (sending player-characters through time to a period of disarray and imminent destruction or decimation of the local culture or society so that people wouldn't remember or notice the strangers among them) or a "lost pocket of Oblivion zone" (some part of Tamriel got sucked into a timeless bubble and because of blah blah blah the inhabitants can never leave) but neither possibility has ever been put on the table. And that still doesn't include the dragon pets (thank the Divines).
People would rather read the lore books and find ways to prove that something is "lore breaking" then just playing the game and having fun. They act as if its a real world and if you break the lore in any little way it will sucks everyone into a black hole. Its hilarious. Though 90% of the people who I play with who are on the leaderboards either don't care about lore or have no idea what lore is . If you add dragons to an eso game it wont be that big of a deal. Its like your asking for pink unicorns that spit fire.
purple-magicb16_ESO wrote: »Trust me, IRL dragons not so scaryhttps://youtu.be/FHuXSZv6Tqs
I see no lore breaking if the content is made by the people who created the universe. For instance, even if Tolkien completely changed parts of his story and people cried lore breaking, it is not lore breaking as was the creator himself who did it. Other people changing parts of his story without his consent IS lore breaking.
Yeah, it's like having the Christmas season starting in September now. It's popular and it makes money, but by Thanksgiving I am tired of "Christmas". I think having the "crisis point time-travel zones" or "lost pocket of Oblivion zones" would be fine if, even while there, you only got hints of the Dwemer or Falmer or Dragons, but they still remained largely unseen and mysterious. But then people would complain that it was a lot of hype for nothing./rant on
And why is that every few months someone asks for dragons/dwemer/falmer/akavir?
[font size=5]Some things get their charm from being ambiguous and some thing will lose their charm if they'll start appearing too often.[/size]
I get it, "Skiyrum iz greatz omg", but as far as I'm concerned TES doesn't need even one more single dragon. Dragons are not a selling point of TES (but it seems they've become just that for a lots of people).
/rant off
On a more serious note, I'm fine if they "tease" a dragon but only if they do it proper! I don't want dragons becoming a gist (again).
tinythinker wrote: »Yeah, it's like having the Christmas season starting in September now. It's popular and it makes money, but by Thanksgiving I am tired of "Christmas". I think having the "crisis point time-travel zones" or "lost pocket of Oblivion zones" would be fine if, even while there, you only got hints of the Dwemer or Falmer or Dragons, but they still remained largely unseen and mysterious. But then people would complain that it was a lot of hype for nothing./rant on
And why is that every few months someone asks for dragons/dwemer/falmer/akavir?
[font size=5]Some things get their charm from being ambiguous and some thing will lose their charm if they'll start appearing too often.[/size]
I get it, "Skiyrum iz greatz omg", but as far as I'm concerned TES doesn't need even one more single dragon. Dragons are not a selling point of TES (but it seems they've become just that for a lots of people).
/rant off
On a more serious note, I'm fine if they "tease" a dragon but only if they do it proper! I don't want dragons becoming a gist (again).
People would rather read the lore books and find ways to prove that something is "lore breaking" then just playing the game and having fun. They act as if its a real world and if you break the lore in any little way it will sucks everyone into a black hole. Its hilarious. Though 90% of the people who I play with who are on the leaderboards either don't care about lore or have no idea what lore is . If you add dragons to an eso game it wont be that big of a deal. Its like your asking for pink unicorns that spit fire.
I have mixed feelings about you
I see no lore breaking if the content is made by the people who created the universe. For instance, even if Tolkien completely changed parts of his story and people cried lore breaking, it is not lore breaking as was the creator himself who did it. Other people changing parts of his story without his consent IS lore breaking.
This guy is smart...
I see no lore breaking if the content is made by the people who created the universe. For instance, even if Tolkien completely changed parts of his story and people cried lore breaking, it is not lore breaking as was the creator himself who did it. Other people changing parts of his story without his consent IS lore breaking.
This guy is smart...
Not really. There is no "author" of TES. And the keyword here is "integrity". If you don't like the world and the lore you have created then remove yourself from it and don't remove the creation from others.
There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest it is a dragonbreak, dragonbreaks only happen if time breaks and nothing in ESO has does anything that would cause that.RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Although, this is the dragonbreak, all the dragons are dead or asleep at this time so there will be no dragons. This has been discussed multiple times before. Search the forums if you have questions like this in the future.
People would rather read the lore books and find ways to prove that something is "lore breaking" then just playing the game and having fun. They act as if its a real world and if you break the lore in any little way it will sucks everyone into a black hole. Its hilarious. Though 90% of the people who I play with who are on the leaderboards either don't care about lore or have no idea what lore is . If you add dragons to an eso game it wont be that big of a deal. Its like your asking for pink unicorns that spit fire.
I have mixed feelings about you
Lol whys that
But Zenimax didn't create the universe, that company they parent over known as Bethesda did.I see no lore breaking if the content is made by the people who created the universe. For instance, even if Tolkien completely changed parts of his story and people cried lore breaking, it is not lore breaking as was the creator himself who did it. Other people changing parts of his story without his consent IS lore breaking.