Corellon Thromorin wrote: »Hardened Ward is ok and doesn't need to be nerfed. What needs to be fixed is shield stacking.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »Corellon Thromorin wrote: »Hardened Ward is ok and doesn't need to be nerfed. What needs to be fixed is shield stacking.
It costs less, it's 3x stronger, and lasts 3x longer than sun shield. That's not okay. Although I do agree, stacking shields should not be allowed. The stronger one should replace the weaker one, but they shouldn't stack.
leepalmer95 wrote: »Strider_Roshin wrote: »Corellon Thromorin wrote: »Hardened Ward is ok and doesn't need to be nerfed. What needs to be fixed is shield stacking.
It costs less, it's 3x stronger, and lasts 3x longer than sun shield. That's not okay. Although I do agree, stacking shields should not be allowed. The stronger one should replace the weaker one, but they shouldn't stack.
It's the only reliable class defence a sorc has?
There have been hundreds of these threads by now. It really is a L2P issue. If your combo consists of Wrecking Blow Wrecking Blow Wrecking Blow, Ambush Abmush Ambush, Jabs Jabs Jabs, Tornado Tornado Tornado, or Sneak Attack Sneak Attack Sneak Attack, you are bad and you should feel bad.
You have to burst down Sorcs. Spamming one ability will never, ever work.
There have been hundreds of these threads by now. It really is a L2P issue. If your combo consists of Wrecking Blow Wrecking Blow Wrecking Blow, Ambush Abmush Ambush, Jabs Jabs Jabs, Tornado Tornado Tornado, or Sneak Attack Sneak Attack Sneak Attack, you are bad and you should feel bad.
You have to burst down Sorcs. Spamming one ability will never, ever work, nor should it.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »There have been hundreds of these threads by now. It really is a L2P issue. If your combo consists of Wrecking Blow Wrecking Blow Wrecking Blow, Ambush Abmush Ambush, Jabs Jabs Jabs, Tornado Tornado Tornado, or Sneak Attack Sneak Attack Sneak Attack, you are bad and you should feel bad.
You have to burst down Sorcs. Spamming one ability will never, ever work, nor should it.
This isn't a nerf sorc forum, this is a discussion on the strength of damage shields. Yes, hardened ward is specific to sorcs but healing ward isn't.
No balancing needed.
I agree on healing ward, it should be up to 100% instead of 300%
But the rest is fine as it is.
DK's and templars have heals to back up their shields. I really wouldn't call Dark Exchange, Blood Magic, Clannfear/Matriarch or Surge heals comparable to those. Sorc's rely on their shields and comparing ward to the shields of classes that do have more reliable heals is not a good one in my opinion.
Let's be honest, spamming Wrecking blow does indeed work
Strider_Roshin wrote: »No balancing needed.
I agree on healing ward, it should be up to 100% instead of 300%
But the rest is fine as it is.
You don't think stacking needs to be addressed. Or the imbalance in shield strength when you compare hardened ward to sun shield, or obsidian shield? I honestly don't mind sorcs having the strongest shield. I just don't agree with the degree that it's stronger. Now if conjured ward were the same strength as obsidian shield, and hardened ward was 33% stronger than that, I think that would be fine. On top of preventing shield stacking.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »No balancing needed.
I agree on healing ward, it should be up to 100% instead of 300%
But the rest is fine as it is.
You don't think stacking needs to be addressed. Or the imbalance in shield strength when you compare hardened ward to sun shield, or obsidian shield? I honestly don't mind sorcs having the strongest shield. I just don't agree with the degree that it's stronger. Now if conjured ward were the same strength as obsidian shield, and hardened ward was 33% stronger than that, I think that would be fine. On top of preventing shield stacking.
DK's and templars have heals to back up their shields. I really wouldn't call Dark Exchange, Blood Magic, Clannfear/Matriarch or Surge heals comparable to those. Sorc's rely on their shields and comparing ward to the shields of classes that do have more reliable heals is not a good one in my opinion.
How can you say that DKs have heals? At least in PvP the 50% heal reduction is too much.
DK's and templars have heals to back up their shields. I really wouldn't call Dark Exchange, Blood Magic, Clannfear/Matriarch or Surge heals comparable to those. Sorc's rely on their shields and comparing ward to the shields of classes that do have more reliable heals is not a good one in my opinion.
How can you say that DKs have heals? At least in PvP the 50% heal reduction is too much.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »DK's and templars have heals to back up their shields. I really wouldn't call Dark Exchange, Blood Magic, Clannfear/Matriarch or Surge heals comparable to those. Sorc's rely on their shields and comparing ward to the shields of classes that do have more reliable heals is not a good one in my opinion.
How can you say that DKs have heals? At least in PvP the 50% heal reduction is too much.
I have a DK, GDB is still powerful when combo'd with igneous shield. I go from 10% to full in around 3 seconds (I hit rally at the 85% mark). It doesn't beat the Templar's healing but DKs are known for their tankiness, not their healing.
DK's and templars have heals to back up their shields. I really wouldn't call Dark Exchange, Blood Magic, Clannfear/Matriarch or Surge heals comparable to those. Sorc's rely on their shields and comparing ward to the shields of classes that do have more reliable heals is not a good one in my opinion.
How can you say that DKs have heals? At least in PvP the 50% heal reduction is too much.
Sure green dragon blood isn't the cure-all it was back when dk's were the kings of the game, but with battle roar and igneous shields 30% healing done buff any heal a dk takes to replace gdb will be significantly stronger than what other classes can do with it.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »
Strider_Roshin wrote: »DK's and templars have heals to back up their shields. I really wouldn't call Dark Exchange, Blood Magic, Clannfear/Matriarch or Surge heals comparable to those. Sorc's rely on their shields and comparing ward to the shields of classes that do have more reliable heals is not a good one in my opinion.
How can you say that DKs have heals? At least in PvP the 50% heal reduction is too much.
I have a DK, GDB is still powerful when combo'd with igneous shield. I go from 10% to full in around 3 seconds (I hit rally at the 85% mark). It doesn't beat the Templar's healing but DKs are known for their tankiness, not their healing.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »
I have a question. Is the health gain the same for DK, Templar and Sorcerer. If they don't put points into health would they end up with the same amount of health? If not The shields should not be the same.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »DK's and templars have heals to back up their shields. I really wouldn't call Dark Exchange, Blood Magic, Clannfear/Matriarch or Surge heals comparable to those. Sorc's rely on their shields and comparing ward to the shields of classes that do have more reliable heals is not a good one in my opinion.
How can you say that DKs have heals? At least in PvP the 50% heal reduction is too much.
I have a DK, GDB is still powerful when combo'd with igneous shield. I go from 10% to full in around 3 seconds (I hit rally at the 85% mark). It doesn't beat the Templar's healing but DKs are known for their tankiness, not their healing.
Probably there is a tamplar somewhere watching at the wall and spamming BoL and you think that the GDB healed you.
Now lets give you an example. You have 30k max health, you lost 25k and you have only 5k. One execute and you are dead. You cast igneous and you cast your GDB. 25000*0.33 = 8250 base heal. 8250*1.3*1.10*1.10 = 13000. Now divide on 2 because of the battle spirit and you are healed for 6.5k
You lost 2 global cooldowns and you healed yourself with 6.5k health. At 5k you were with 16% from your life and after your heal you are at 38% from your health.
I even added in the calculations some additional healing buffs from passives.