Merlin13KAGL wrote: »Asinine. They provide their own "work around" for the very thing they were trying to eliminate.
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We have been working on getting the ability to have multiple characters on accounts from different Alliances allowed to play in the same Campaign, but no ETA on when that will go live.
kevlarto_ESO wrote: »ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We have been working on getting the ability to have multiple characters on accounts from different Alliances allowed to play in the same Campaign, but no ETA on when that will go live.kevlarto_ESO wrote: »Bad idea, this is part of the problem, being able to switch factions in a campaign because you want to join the winning team or to emp farm is just bad, to me this defeats the whole spirit of three faction warfare, no faction pride, no drive to support a faction, I hope you take a long slow look at this before acting upon it.
I don't want to encourage cheaters but the truth is I really really don't care about faction pride. I'll fight for or with my friends more than anything else, and it's so frustrating to not be able to take AD character to meet up with someone in a campaign because EP character was there two weeks ago.
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »In the upcoming Imperial City patch we have disabled the ability to use “Jump to Group leader” in PVP Zones however we have not disabled the ability to queue with group mates via the Campaign Queue’ing system. This means if player A is assigned to Haderus and player B is assigned to Chillrend and they are grouped, they can queue to join the others Home assignment. They cannot join each other’s Guest assignment however. A lot of feedback and concerns have been mentioned about getting stuck in a campaign that you might not want to be in, and this change is partially to address that.
We have been working on getting the ability to have multiple characters on accounts from different Alliances allowed to play in the same Campaign, but no ETA on when that will go live.
newtinmpls wrote: »And I really want to play with my friends on ... overlapping campaigns. Anyone have any suggestions?
newtinmpls wrote: »And I really want to play with my friends on ... overlapping campaigns. Anyone have any suggestions?
The most obvious one is that people who want to PvP together should choose the same campaign. It surely can't be that hard to talk to the people you want to PvP with and say "Hey, let's decide on a campaign."
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »In the upcoming Imperial City patch we have disabled the ability to use “Jump to Group leader” in PVP Zones however we have not disabled the ability to queue with group mates via the Campaign Queue’ing system. This means if player A is assigned to Haderus and player B is assigned to Chillrend and they are grouped, they can queue to join the others Home assignment. They cannot join each other’s Guest assignment however. A lot of feedback and concerns have been mentioned about getting stuck in a campaign that you might not want to be in, and this change is partially to address that.
This... is incredibly disheartening. One of the issues many of us hoped you were fixing is the ability ofpeople to travel from campaign to campaign willy-nilly. Yet your response here makes it obvious that you haven't solved this problem at all.
This:We have been working on getting the ability to have multiple characters on accounts from different Alliances allowed to play in the same Campaign, but no ETA on when that will go live.
is also disheartening. A player should NOT be able to play their AD, EP and DC characters in the same campaign or travel to that campaign. Ever. It promotes cheating and exploiting. Spying is just the tip of the iceberg. Just a few nights ago, we had two players who logged onto their AD characters, removed a DC scroll from an AD keep and ran it all the way back into DC territory, whereupon they switched to their DC characters and placed the scroll in a DC keep. We have players who will switch to another faction character, then help their friends get into keeps. The list goes on and on. If your AD character is in a particular campaign, then your EP character and/or DC character should NOT be able to be in that same campaign.
This single thread has utterly annihilated a lot of the hope I had that we were finally getting some changes that would help improve PvP. It's just... so disappointing.
Joy_Division wrote: »Let me paint a picture for you.
I have a blue. She is homed on Azura'a.
I have a red. She is homed on Thorn.
What am I supposed to do when my blue guild plays on Thorn?
If you have it your way, I will have no choice but to play on my red.
Why would you and your guild not ensure that the home/guest campaigns of everyone's blue characters matched? This is what continues to baffle me. If you're in a PvP guild, presumably it's because you want to group and PvP with the people in that guild. So why would you, or anyone else, have characters homed/guested on different campaigns than the ones the guild is homed/guested in?
newtinmpls wrote: »Five guilds