Competitively, yes. But if you only care about completing the content, suboptimal races work just fine. I've no clue about PvP, I don't play it, but you have to be incredibly naive to come into this mode expecting Skyrim 2.0.leepalmer95 wrote: »You can roll any race/class combination and faceroll through the content in ESO, it's no different from Skyrim in this aspect. Racials only really matter to competitive min-maxers.Psychobunni wrote: »Just no, to me this is worse than asking for no "classes". You can play any role you want, with any race you want, there was never a guarantee that you can be the best at it or even as good as another...only that you can
Edit: I blame this way of thinking on Skyrim and not MMO's. You can play whatever you want, set to easy and faceroll through the game (my 6 year old does it)...now in a setting against other players that made race choices that "made sense" for their role(s) instead of "I always play xxxx", they want that same easy mode.
What is the point of different races if they have no defining characteristics?
You'd be suprised at how much races mean at end game pve or end game pvp content.
How about NO,
It's part of what makes our characters Unique and further separates us from just different classes.
Malediktus wrote: »No. I like that races are different. I dont want races to be as boring as in Guild Wars 2 where its all cosmetic.
How are the racial passives imbalanced? I'm curious to know.The way I see it, imbalance was introduced into racial passives as a way to sell more copies of the Imperial Edition. With more DLC's lurking around the corner, I'm sure they will introduce further ways to imbalance the system as a means to secure more profit.
Leave them as they are, and learn to adapt to the changing nature of MMOs without expecting every single aspect to be finely balanced.