Would you pay for high quality content?

PBpsy · June 2015

No I do not want any more damned stupid quests at all not even if they are made by gold. and cheese.
I would pay for a couple of dozens of new vet dungeons though,

BurtFreeman · June 2015

i voted no, becouse first i will like to see high quality in the current content: i mean pvp lags fixed, first
i bought 2 account and subscribtion for while, so i think i've payed in half for what i've got.
the second account i never use, becouse of all those boring limitation about bound items; so the way the game is at the moment, i will not going to buy another account, neither the crown store, becouse there are not so interesting things. i will buy bank space, instead.

the question is wrong in itself, becouse quest has always to be high quality.
i think the right question is how much you will pay for a new dlc sized content? this is another thing, and i will probabily buy it for a reasonable price, like i've done always with the elder scrolls games

Sausage · June 2015

All you need to pay is ES+ and you get access to all content and you get 1500 Crown every month too for a shop. Thats the plan.

Nifty2g · June 2015

yes, just release something already, i'm content starved

olemanwinter · June 2015

This game is going P2W. I feel like the P2Play_Better_Content is a window quickly slamming shut.

Agobi · June 2015

I did pay..every month..think they called it a 'subscription'..

Then they stopped adding content,so I stopped paying

Oliviander · June 2015

Since launch I pay for low quality content
who in hell needs high quality

Iluvrien · June 2015

PBpsy wrote: »

No I do not want any more damned stupid quests at all not even if they are made by gold. and cheese.
I would pay for a couple of dozens of new vet dungeons though,

I do not want any more damned stupid vet dungeons at all, not even if they are made of gold and cheese.
I would pay for a couple of dozens of new quests though.

GamerzElite · June 2015

ZOS already confirmed future DLC's are paid, so this poll is useless.

Cogo · June 2015

If you sub, you dont have to buy the DLCs.

Grimnaur · June 2015

Sylance9 wrote: »

I would pay for a high quality goat.

Play "Goat Simulator"..... Be the goat.

GamerzElite · June 2015

@Cogo Subscription is paid too mate. I think u didn't understand my sentence. Nothing is free now in ESO.

Tavore1138 · June 2015

BigM wrote: »

Gidorick wrote: »

I did for over a year. I'll pay for what they make AFTER they make it. That's what ZOS wants. Fine. Let's do it that way.

And yes, I'm bitter about it.

Same here I love the game hate how we been treated. I'm with @Gidorick on this one.

Yes, sadly I will pay again for the content they reneged on providing in year 1 but their first release had better be pretty damn good or I doubt I will be here for the second.

FelixTheCatt · June 2015

I thought we did this when we bought the game. I know I did. The whole point to my buying this game was as a WoW alternative and i've always loved the ES games. Always said if they ever made the Elder Scrolls into an online franchise i'd be first in line to try it. If they could take a real time turn based strategy game like Warcraft and make it the most successful mmo or all time , ES should absolutely rock.

pmn100b16_ESO · June 2015

No, didn't get quality content when I paid a subscription and have no intention of buying anything in future cause we all know it'll just be a new zone with solo quests, v16 grind, and a group dungeon dropping new gear. I see nothing original coming to this game.

RobDaCool · June 2015

Since I did pay for low quality content I am sure I'd pay for high

cazlonb16_ESO · June 2015

What's the point of this thread ? We will have to pay for new content either by subscription or for the DLC. We already know that.

anitajoneb17_ESO · June 2015

Since "high quality standard" will vary greatly from player to player, this poll is not relevant imho.

Korah_Eaglecry · June 2015

OP you do know that when they release Imperial City and Wrothgar that people will have to pay to access it right? That B2P doesnt mean players are entitled to the new content without renting it with a sub or out right purchasing it?

Xendyn · June 2015

Cogo wrote: »

If you sub, you dont have to buy the DLCs.

True...
you get to rent them

Danikat · June 2015

Of course I would. That's exactly what I did when I bought this game (and many others) and I've been eagerly waiting to do it again. When I'm at home I log in at least once a day to check the announcements and crown store for new stuff, when I'm not at home I check the website and facebook page. If they sell it I'll buy it.

Although that doesn't mean I'll blindly buy whatever they sell for however much they charge. I'm going to decide when it's announced/released whether it's actually quality content.

Psychobunni · June 2015

@Firellight Don't get frustrated, maybe try again with a clearer picture of what you mean in the OP itself. Many people (myself included) don't read every single post on a thread all the time.

And bear with some of us who sub'ed from PC launch until B2P (or after) and were led to believe certain content would be coming that is not only still not here a year later, but we must also pay extra for it now. It is aggravating to say the least.

Lava_Croft · June 2015

This sounds like the proposition ZOS made to its customers over a year ago.

Gidorick · June 2015

Psychobunni wrote: »

@Firellight Don't get frustrated, maybe try again with a clearer picture of what you mean in the OP itself. Many people (myself included) don't read every single post on a thread all the time.

And bear with some of us who sub'ed from PC launch until B2P (or after) and were led to believe certain content would be coming that is not only still not here a year later, but we must also pay extra for it now. It is aggravating to say the least.

Let's see... back in July 2014 subscribers were lead to believe we were getting quite a bit. Some of it, Facial animations, veteran system, justice system we have gotten. Well, half of the justice system. Then there is what we haven't gotten:

Imperial City
Murkmire
Wrothgar
Spellcrafting
Various Armor Sets

Although I know there is no chance of this happening, those of us who subscribed for the entirety of the subscription (no exceptions, no matter the sob-story) should receive the DLC Zones of Imperial City, Murkmire, and Wrothgar for FREE and should receive the Glass Motif for FREE. This doesn't cover all that we were lead to believe we were going to get but it really would be a great gesture on the part of ZOS.

Reverb · June 2015

I spent a year thinking that I was paying for quality content to be developed. It turned out I was paying for the development of a cash shop and console release. "Fool me once..." and such.

firstdecan · June 2015

Gidorick wrote: »

I did for over a year. I'll pay for what they make AFTER they make it. That's what ZOS wants. Fine. Let's do it that way.

And yes, I'm bitter about it.

EQBallzz wrote: »

/agreed.

To the OP..you forgot the option of..."I already paid for great content for a year and still waiting".

Lava_Croft wrote: »

This sounds like the proposition ZOS made to its customers over a year ago.

This seems to be the majority consensus, adding my +1 to it.

Firellight wrote: »

Psychobunni wrote: »

Elijah_Crow wrote: »

Bitter Party of 2!

LOL! (in a normal, not mean way)

@Firellight you could give a little more detail in how it will be different from the upcoming DLC's they have been promising, and why exactly it should come at a cost to Plus membership that some feel isnt even worth the cost now

Since the feedback has been great so far, I can share my idea. Imagine this: a monthly contest (run by the community) that rewards cash to awesome content submissions, be they quests, outfit designs, fanfiction for books, etc. Anything to help ZOS with the non-technical parts of development, since the idea and planning phases can be brutal. We can use Patreon as a way to fund the projects. Also any people who didn't make it could get monetary funds through a percentage of total likes from all the submissions. So if you had 25 likes on a submission, and it was 1% of the funds for that month (5k?) you could get $50! The best submissions would be those with each step detailed, with dialogue options and objectives. Lore would also be a factor for the contest. All ZOS would have to do is code the stuff in and voice act the quests; we can even have people provide voices.

I don't know about you, but I see a lot of potential in a suggestion community, and if there are monetization opportunities, talented people would commit to writing TES literature.

@Firelight - This is a good idea in theory, but ZoS has not released any "modding tools" that would enable player created content. I honestly think an ability to mod the game would give it much more replayability and longevity (it worked for other TES titles). Unless they have it in the works, it probably won't be added to the game. Look at how difficult ZoS thought it would be just to add a Z-axis to swimming,

http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/169947/the-30-minutes-underwater-discussion-on-eso-live/p1

Psychobunni · June 2015

Gidorick wrote: »

Psychobunni wrote: »

@Firellight Don't get frustrated, maybe try again with a clearer picture of what you mean in the OP itself. Many people (myself included) don't read every single post on a thread all the time.

And bear with some of us who sub'ed from PC launch until B2P (or after) and were led to believe certain content would be coming that is not only still not here a year later, but we must also pay extra for it now. It is aggravating to say the least.

Let's see... back in July 2014 subscribers were lead to believe we were getting quite a bit. Some of it, Facial animations, veteran system, justice system we have gotten. Well, half of the justice system. Then there is what we haven't gotten:
Imperial City

Murkmire

Wrothgar

Spellcrafting

Various Armor Sets

Although I know there is no chance of this happening, those of us who subscribed for the entirety of the subscription (no exceptions, no matter the sob-story) should receive the DLC Zones of Imperial City, Murkmire, and Wrothgar for FREE and should receive the Glass Motif for FREE. This doesn't cover all that we were lead to believe we were going to get but it really would be a great gesture on the part of ZOS.

The OP explained further in the comments that they were talking about player created content of sorts. I am well aware of what we were led to believe. But that is why I was saying they should try again with a clearer OP. Few understand what they (the OP) is even talking about because of the lack of clarity.

Katsibrokos · June 2015

No because

1. I m already paying my sub
2. I dont care about more quests
3. I prefer other content like New and better designed dungeons, raids, world bosses, events etc
4. I prefer new or improved features like a better LFG tool (like GW2), a Wardrobe (like D3) etc
5. I prefer to see fixes to things like latency, animation and skill delay etc

Gidorick · June 2015

I think some of us have just started talking about our own thing @Psychobunni.

Maybe OP is thinking of trying to organize a Quest Guild with players playing NPCs and giving out quest info and whatnot. I've considered this type of thing but I don't think players should be trying to provide content that ZOS is unwilling to and unwilling to support.

Give us the Creation tools and watch the magic happen.

Maybe the op is thinking of charging for this "service".... I really don't think they will have much luck with that. I'm not even sure it would be within the TOS.

Saturn · June 2015

I think they do in fact owe us some Grade A content, seeing how the "ESO plus" is supposed to include the extra expansions to the game for free, but by the time the release those the cost of ESO plus will heavily outweigh the cost of the expansion, I am sure. Not that I really mind, I just want them to update the game because it is super boring doing the same stuff over and over..