Would you like to see "Friendly Fire" added to siege.

Preyfar · June 2015

It's fine the way it is, haters gonna' hate

I can't even tell what siege is friendly or enemy, let alone to have friendly siege do damage, too.

InvictoNZ · June 2015

Lets make siege realistic - fraging friends can be fun and the more ways the better!!

Games that don't allow friendly fire are very short sighted.

GorraShatan · June 2015

I am worried it would become a griefers paradise - though I would ideally like friendly siege AoE

Troll camps were bad enough.

Domander · June 2015

Yeah.. that would be good... so players on your own alliance can kill you if they want. How many players would exploit this...hmm

Hypertionb14_ESO · June 2015

realism aside it would be disasterous to implement FF in this game... there is enough blustering in Zone chat without "YOU *** YOU HIT ME WITH YOUR SIEGE YOU LOL *** NUB LTP YOU ***" and such.

there are enough trolls without adding more bridges...

btw... you all realize this topic was started in September 2014 when ground oil was still around and the next post was nearly a year later

RadioheadSh0t · June 2015

I am worried it would become a griefers paradise - though I would ideally like friendly siege AoE

No, but ZOS should change friendly siege to a green circle.

PKMN12 · June 2015

anyone who thinks it would NOT become a Greifer tool clearly has never played a competitive game with friendly fire before.

Jules · June 2015

It's fine the way it is, haters gonna' hate

Teargrants wrote: »

Yes please, I double pinky pwomise I will only use this power for good, and in no way will I set up siege bombs on Kirin Blaze, Steve, or Bulby.

Jules, I can't believe you chose no, must be that the PvE has blinded you to the possibilities. =\

LOL. The rage from Kirin would be never ending.
And yeah. Just too much potential for trolololol

Teargrants · June 2015

Lets make siege realistic - fraging friends can be fun and the more ways the better!!

Jules wrote: »

Teargrants wrote: »

Yes please, I double pinky pwomise I will only use this power for good, and in no way will I set up siege bombs on Kirin Blaze, Steve, or Bulby.

Jules, I can't believe you chose no, must be that the PvE has blinded you to the possibilities. =\

LOL. The rage from Kirin would be never ending.
And yeah. Just too much potential for trolololol

Think of it as a...learning experience.

Forestd16b14_ESO · June 2015

I am worried it would become a griefers paradise - though I would ideally like friendly siege AoE

Like is a intresting idea but with some pretty violent hate with in your own alliance it would cause alot of problems. So intresting idea but I can't see this ever happening.

technohic · June 2015

It's fine the way it is, haters gonna' hate

Hmm, maybe it would encourage fighting within the larger factions. Competing with someone about to crown a new emp? Siege their zerg and keep them away from getting more AP.

tinythinker · June 2015

I have an alternative idea

Bazeric wrote: »

Why not a special campaign that's hardcore mode a la Battlefield?! Friendly fire everything, not just aoe! Then we could watch the real skill quarrels ignite here. You have to be sure you can pick AND hit the right targets. I wonder how well the self-policing would work if there were enough serious players. It is a fun thought at least, considering the concerning state PVP finds itself in.

Yeah, I was going to say it should be optional. If people want a hardcore mode for PvP, take one of the two 30 day campaigns and give it special rules. The downside is that few people may want to play in such a campaign unless it had some nice rewards. Don't see this rule set being added though, and there are other special rule sets/campaign features players have proposed that might be more popular.