DaniAngione wrote: »
Again with the elitism label. Boring. Accusing me of not wanting people to have fun is total nonesense as it has nothing to do with the point, which is that there is a very big difference between giving out titles based on in game activities and quite another to hand out titles based on who subbed to the game and who didn't. If you don't get why that is a completly different animal, there is little to discuss.
Going in circles. Again, asking for a title to be based on when and for how long you subbed to the game is not asking for something "fun" it is asking to label the community based on their financial contribution to the game and there is already WAY too much enphasis on this point given how massively negative some people's reactions have been to the topic of money, pets, rewards, and anything whatever to do with financial decisions like subbing to the game. That you don't see how this would significantly impact players feelings is obvious. Moving on.
how massively negative some people's reactions have been to the topic of money, pets, rewards, and anything whatever to do with financial decisions like subbing to the game.
Again with the elitism label. Boring. Accusing me of not wanting people to have fun is total nonesense as it has nothing to do with the point, which is that there is a very big difference between giving out titles based on in game activities and quite another to hand out titles based on who subbed to the game and who didn't. If you don't get why that is a completly different animal, there is little to discuss.
You know..just because you don't want something doesn't mean nobody should get it.
If we get titles thats great, no ones forcing you to use a title. If you don't like it, don't play it.
Stop crying "ELITIST!!!" every time someone wants something in game. You're even against the idea that subs should get extra benefits than non subs...I think now when people read this they will start to understand you a little better.Going in circles. Again, asking for a title to be based on when and for how long you subbed to the game is not asking for something "fun" it is asking to label the community based on their financial contribution to the game and there is already WAY too much enphasis on this point given how massively negative some people's reactions have been to the topic of money, pets, rewards, and anything whatever to do with financial decisions like subbing to the game. That you don't see how this would significantly impact players feelings is obvious. Moving on.
Subscribers got pets for you know..paying money to the game...so what if they get titles? Are you saying the loyalty rewards are labellnig the community based on their financial contribution? Because that's what they literally are. Nobody is complaining about the pets. People pay money to the game...it's expected they'd get certain benefits for giving a monthly fee.
By the way...saying moving on doesn't make your opinion right, it only makes you look like a child.how massively negative some people's reactions have been to the topic of money, pets, rewards, and anything whatever to do with financial decisions like subbing to the game.
So why are you subbing now then?
The_Antiquarian wrote: »Unique unobtainable exclusive costumes and titles please for the loyal customers who have been with ESO ever since its beginning.
The_Antiquarian wrote: »Unique unobtainable exclusive costumes and titles please for the loyal customers who have been with ESO ever since its beginning.
"Unobtainable" is about as exclusive as it gets.
I'd like to see more achievement-based titles. And I really don't care about any BETA titles or anything kind of it.
I love the idea. But I'd go for several maybe.
Beta - Beta Monkey
Early Access/Launch - Founder
Up to March 17th 2015 - Champion or similar
IMHO, I don't feel I am entitled to a special title because I've been here since the games launch in 2014. Titles should be earned and not given freely.
For the one's that have been here from beta there is only one title we should get.
SUCKER
Come on it was funny.