I believe that if one expects the (hopeful) influx of new players to be immature, trollish mouth breathers that is what will be found.
Likewise, if you are looking for great new players who, for whatever reason, started playing because of the change in payment model, then you may make a lot of new friends.
Separate forums? Why stop there? What if we forced everyone who is not subscribed to have a flashing, neon '-$' sign over their head? Then we could easily spot the human refuse and not have to interact with them at all!
This Subscriber > Non Subscriber mentality is, quite frankly, ridiculous and smacks of petty elitism. Does anyone truly think that they have the moral high ground because they pay fifteen bucks a month? Is that truly the measure of your worth? If so you need to find new sources of personal affirmation.
It's a game. Treat all your fellow players with respect and kindness and you'll be amazed at the results.
Der_Deutsche_Hase wrote: »I'm a tad bit concerned with what's going to happen to this well matured community when it goes into F2P/B2P. I'm concerned because most F2P games usually get a bad reputation with the community because it becomes very toxic, very fast. And because this game is subscription based currently, this means that the adults way out weight the children in numbers currently, and obviously this won't last when it goes into f2p/b2p.
What are your guy's thoughts on this? Does anyone share my concern about this?
Humanistic wrote: »My first question would be, "What community?" Hardly anyone talks in guilds, or even out in the open. The only chat that goes on is in zone, and none of those people would ever group with anyone else because it would just hamper their progress. Sorry to make it real, but the community isn't very good to begin with, if you can even call it that.
Der_Deutsche_Hase wrote: »Humanistic wrote: »My first question would be, "What community?" Hardly anyone talks in guilds, or even out in the open. The only chat that goes on is in zone, and none of those people would ever group with anyone else because it would just hamper their progress. Sorry to make it real, but the community isn't very good to begin with, if you can even call it that.
Talking is not always what makes a community.
frosth.darkomenb16_ESO wrote: »He has a point though, ESO doesn't really foster player interaction.
We are fairly segregated with phasing and instancing.
Der_Deutsche_Hase wrote: »frosth.darkomenb16_ESO wrote: »He has a point though, ESO doesn't really foster player interaction.
We are fairly segregated with phasing and instancing.
I dunno about that. I seem to have great interaction in groups and pvp. But just like every MMO out there, most people do quests solo, and as they do training.
I don't like post where people try to mix F2P/B2P together. They are too different things and i see this as a troll post. The OP is baiting people to argue.
I've played alot of mmo's F2p,B2p and sub.based. All online game communities have bad players in them. You elitist mmo's should be sub.only player's have been throwing this around for year's. And it's total crap. But if it make's you feel better then just ignore me.
Nocturnalis wrote: »Sub fees are what make the WoW and FF: ARR communities so great.
Der_Deutsche_Hase wrote: »I'm a tad bit concerned with what's going to happen to this well matured community when it goes into F2P/B2P. I'm concerned because most F2P games usually get a bad reputation with the community because it becomes very toxic, very fast. And because this game is subscription based currently, this means that the adults way out weight the children in numbers currently, and obviously this won't last when it goes into f2p/b2p.
What are your guy's thoughts on this? Does anyone share my concern about this?
We can have ESO+ only community forums?
Nocturnalis wrote: »Sub fees are what make the WoW and FF: ARR communities so great.
houimetub17_ESO wrote: »Im afraid of toxic free to players you meet in games like league of legends to hop over this game and ruin it.
Tbh ive never seen such a great community than the one of todays Eso and I played everquest 1, Daoc, WoW and UO.
"In my thoughts and in my dreams, they're always in my mind
These songs of hobbits, dwarves and men, and elves
Come close your eyes, you can see them too..."
I've played alot of mmo's F2p,B2p and sub.based. All online game communities have bad players in them. You elitist mmo's should be sub.only player's have been throwing this around for year's. And it's total crap. But if it make's you feel better then just ignore me.
I've played alot of mmo's F2p,B2p and sub.based. All online game communities have bad players in them. You elitist mmo's should be sub.only player's have been throwing this around for year's. And it's total crap. But if it make's you feel better then just ignore me.
No, you haven't.
"In my thoughts and in my dreams, they're always in my mind
These songs of hobbits, dwarves and men, and elves
Come close your eyes, you can see them too..."
riverdragon72 wrote: »Read the comments under the 2015 ESO trailer on You Tube, there is where the climate of this game is going
I've played alot of mmo's F2p,B2p and sub.based. All online game communities have bad players in them. You elitist mmo's should be sub.only player's have been throwing this around for year's. And it's total crap. But if it make's you feel better then just ignore me.
No, you haven't.
I play mmo's since UO, early 90's, and I fully agree with him.
What define good/bad community is people's education, not people's money.
There are a lot of horrible people full of money. You can see even in this thread. Or WoW.
O real good example is Marvel Heroes. The game is f2p, and have one of the greatest communities I've ever seen.