ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
Then why did you continue to pay? Sorry, I have no sympathy since you could have stopped paying, waited for that content to be fixed, then resumed.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
Then why did you continue to pay? Sorry, I have no sympathy since you could have stopped paying, waited for that content to be fixed, then resumed.
You payed to have access to a game which I find hard to believe you did not enjoy
You played for several months just like many others. I don't understand what you think a company that is in business to make money is supposed to do with it as they receive it.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
I'm assuming that the OP and fellow critics have done the same as me, and paid during the last year in order to play a game they were enjoying. I can't imagine why they would have been paying all that time otherwise, as if at any time they felt they weren't getting value for money then doubtless they would have cancelled.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
I'm assuming that the OP and fellow critics have done the same as me, and paid during the last year in order to play a game they were enjoying. I can't imagine why they would have been paying all that time otherwise, as if at any time they felt they weren't getting value for money then doubtless they would have cancelled.
I think the point he is making is that zoos seems to have lied to all of us about their intentions and where the resources were going. I can't believe that content and bug fixes to the live game were not delayed in order to work on the cash shop and the buy to play transition.
Yes I did enjoy my time in the game, but like others have stated I just feel a little lied to. First they advertised this game as the AvA was their premier endgame. I find it hard to believe anyone who played AvA extensively will argue with me that they have abandoned that idea. Second they clearly said this game would not go F2P and they couldn't even hold true for a year?
I will stick around and see where this goes, but I will not invest anymore financially as I just feel the trust level is not there that they are going to provide anything of quality with my funds.
kelly.medleyb14_ESO wrote: »
^ this, another dishonest company, I'm going back to Blizzard.
1. Game-breaking bugs. The game launched with so many broken quests many of us couldn't progress for weeks (even months in some cases). We saw these bugs during the Beta, screamed and yelled that the game could not launch with so many broken quests, and it did anyway. Remember, you were a paying customer while ZOS took the time to work these out; they didn't fix them before launch. You were paying $15 a month for quests that were KNOWN to be broken during the Beta. The game launched with KNOWN broken quests, and you got charged while they fixed them.
2. Lackluster UI design. Guild functionality, guild stores, group-finder tool, etc. All of these are woefully lacking to the point of being broken (group finder is universally despised). One year in and UI is pitiful.
3. Poor game performance. If you PvP you know this too well. Cyrodiil is in a perpetual state of lag and crashes and boots. This has been the case since Day 1 despite literally every set of patch notes claiming to have "fixed" performance in Cyrodiil.
4. Craglorn. That's it. That's the "content" you got for an entire year's subscription. One new zone, a couple of mini raids, oh and some veteran modes of dungeons sprinkled in. One. Year's. Content.
5. Dyes and guild tabards. Oh yay!
That's it. That's what your entire year's subscription got you. If you had fun while playing, great, I am genuinely happy for you. But that doesn't excuse the lack of REAL content that was given while the Developers were putting our cash toward developing content that would be B2P.
kelly.medleyb14_ESO wrote: »Yes I did enjoy my time in the game, but like others have stated I just feel a little lied to. First they advertised this game as the AvA was their premier endgame. I find it hard to believe anyone who played AvA extensively will argue with me that they have abandoned that idea. Second they clearly said this game would not go F2P and they couldn't even hold true for a year?
I will stick around and see where this goes, but I will not invest anymore financially as I just feel the trust level is not there that they are going to provide anything of quality with my funds.
^ this, another dishonest company, I'm going back to Blizzard.