Top tier = the best
The best = have all benefits
have a ll benefits = have all passives that give said benefits
It does not mater how small it is, its the fact that some cant get it fairly.
zZzleepyhead wrote: »While rereading patch notes from 1.5.5...
•Updated the Undaunted skill line tooltip to include Undaunted Pledges as a way to gain reputation
ers101284b14_ESO wrote: »Next time use ALL caps locks with the bold. And throw in a few angry comments. Maybe call them names and threaten to un-sub. Then bump it a few more times. That will work for sure.
Hortator Mopa wrote: »ers101284b14_ESO wrote: »Next time use ALL caps locks with the bold. And throw in a few angry comments. Maybe call them names and threaten to un-sub. Then bump it a few more times. That will work for sure.
Good idea! may edit post lol. Wont unsub yet, however some days I go to log on and then decide to play a different game to avoid the derpness.
That's sad, and though it's probably true...the problem, for me at least, isn't that I can't get my passives NAO. I'm halfway to Undaunted 8 by doing all the pledges. Doesn't matter, the point is attitude. They basically told their most dedicated players they don't give a **** about us.It's all about quantity over quality, I hope you understand.
The bean-counters at meetings wait for someone to bring up a design issue and say, "how many of the population of the game are affected by this issue?" and if the answer is below a certain threshold, they say "not worth spending time on..."
It doesn't matter if it's poor design. It doesn't matter if it doesn't make sense. It doesn't matter that if you put the resources into handling things with artistry and elegance that you'd have the best game ever.
What matters is the risk vs. reward for the accountants and senior management - at the end of the day it is better to have a mediocre game that makes lots of money than to have a great game that makes less money.
Very few of the people I've known in most of the guilds I've played finished all the dungeons previous to 1.5. Many of the ones who did have left the game. So I'd guess that the % of active subscribers who finished all the dungeon achievements before 1.5 is pretty small, probably in the small single digits.
Why should they take time and money to do extra work to fit that in to the development schedule, especially given the attendant risk of getting it wrong and making a big bug somewhere?
And of course remember it's not just this issue; it's all issues. And it's not just game companies, it's the people who make your cars and clothing and houses and food - think about that the next time you eat a dessert topping that has the same ingredients as your floor wax.
Have a nice day.
That's sad, and though it's probably true...the problem, for me at least, isn't that I can't get my passives NAO. I'm halfway to Undaunted 8 by doing all the pledges. Doesn't matter, the point is attitude. They basically told their most dedicated players they don't give a **** about us.
Hortator Mopa wrote: »I am seeing ZOS members commenting on stupid threads about ideas that wont be implemented for ages if ever like "A bird that flys around and can land on your shoulder". They are saying things like "This has a lot of good ideas".
Yet they cant respond to a topic that has thousands of players at a disadvantage for PLAYING THE GAME CONTENT prior to a update.
guybrushtb16_ESO wrote: »Hortator Mopa wrote: »I am seeing ZOS members commenting on stupid threads about ideas that wont be implemented for ages if ever like "A bird that flys around and can land on your shoulder". They are saying things like "This has a lot of good ideas".
Yet they cant respond to a topic that has thousands of players at a disadvantage for PLAYING THE GAME CONTENT prior to a update.
Maybe that's because the thread title just can't be taken seriously. Also, nobody likes people who need to spell out their ideas in both bold and caps. Nobody.
Hortator Mopa wrote: »guybrushtb16_ESO wrote: »Hortator Mopa wrote: »I am seeing ZOS members commenting on stupid threads about ideas that wont be implemented for ages if ever like "A bird that flys around and can land on your shoulder". They are saying things like "This has a lot of good ideas".
Yet they cant respond to a topic that has thousands of players at a disadvantage for PLAYING THE GAME CONTENT prior to a update.
Maybe that's because the thread title just can't be taken seriously. Also, nobody likes people who need to spell out their ideas in both bold and caps. Nobody.
Cant be taken seriously? Nearly ever response on a thread with over 4k views is in my favor.
I use bold because (once again) there is over 4k views and its been on the top of general forums for over 14 days and no ZOS member has responded. YET they can respond to stupid posts.
You and your logic can not be taken serious.. either dumb or a troll. No right minded person would think that this is a thread that cant be taken seriously.
How better can it be explained, We played the game content, now we dont get what everyone else gets. THUS
Punished for playing the game
Hortator Mopa wrote: »guybrushtb16_ESO wrote: »Hortator Mopa wrote: »I am seeing ZOS members commenting on stupid threads about ideas that wont be implemented for ages if ever like "A bird that flys around and can land on your shoulder". They are saying things like "This has a lot of good ideas".
Yet they cant respond to a topic that has thousands of players at a disadvantage for PLAYING THE GAME CONTENT prior to a update.
Maybe that's because the thread title just can't be taken seriously. Also, nobody likes people who need to spell out their ideas in both bold and caps. Nobody.
Cant be taken seriously? Nearly ever response on a thread with over 4k views is in my favor.
I use bold because (once again) there is over 4k views and its been on the top of general forums for over 14 days and no ZOS member has responded. YET they can respond to stupid posts.
You and your logic can not be taken serious.. either dumb or a troll. No right minded person would think that this is a thread that cant be taken seriously.
How better can it be explained, We played the game content, now we dont get what everyone else gets. THUS
Punished for playing the game
Hortator Mopa wrote: »^ not about exp, rewards or what is lost.
Do I really have to keep saying this...
It is about being punished for doing in game content.
Who cares if the reward is 1% or 10000000% bonus to hp. Its how they are willing to design the game to punish current players who ACTUALLY play the game content.
Hortator Mopa wrote: »^ not about exp, rewards or what is lost.
Do I really have to keep saying this...
It is about being punished for doing in game content.
Who cares if the reward is 1% or 10000000% bonus to hp. Its how they are willing to design the game to punish current players who ACTUALLY play the game content.
It's not a punishment, you can get to undaunted level 10 pretty fast and they aren't in any obligation to award retroactively points for things you did before.
Just keep playing the game and chill, this is not an important nor a gamebreaking issue.
Hortator Mopa wrote: »Hortator Mopa wrote: »^ not about exp, rewards or what is lost.
Do I really have to keep saying this...
It is about being punished for doing in game content.
Who cares if the reward is 1% or 10000000% bonus to hp. Its how they are willing to design the game to punish current players who ACTUALLY play the game content.
It's not a punishment, you can get to undaunted level 10 pretty fast and they aren't in any obligation to award retroactively points for things you did before.
Just keep playing the game and chill, this is not an important nor a gamebreaking issue.
its 100% fair to give a player who did less a advantage over another player who did more work. - you