jambam817_ESO wrote: »Solo players... you're telling me that you would love to continue paying $15 a month for a SOLO gaming experience that FORCES you to be online?
jambam817_ESO wrote: »Solo players... you're telling me that you would love to continue paying $15 a month for a SOLO gaming experience that FORCES you to be online?
Every time i see people begging for "more solo content" it amazes me that they want to continue playing this game alone and pay $15 a month for it. Would you do that for Skyrim? What about Dark Souls II? The cost of the game + $15 a month to solo along in that too with the occasional online interaction?
The people that think this game should cater and provide even MORE content than the 3 alliance regions and delves really need to re-think the type of game they are playing. The continuation of this attitude will lead to gamers being OK with any game labeled "MMO" charging sub fees simply because they are online.
This game needs more reasons to be called an MMO. More timesinks, More group focused content that is not exclusive to raiding/trials. As it stands now, the players coming here expecting an MMO experience like myself will gradually realize they are just playing TES VI online with a fee and no real value added by the other players they may see on the screen...
Just my 2 cents. Carry on
jambam817_ESO wrote: »Solo players... you're telling me that you would love to continue paying $15 a month for a SOLO gaming experience that FORCES you to be online?
Every time i see people begging for "more solo content" it amazes me that they want to continue playing this game alone and pay $15 a month for it. Would you do that for Skyrim? What about Dark Souls II? The cost of the game + $15 a month to solo along in that too with the occasional online interaction?
The people that think this game should cater and provide even MORE content than the 3 alliance regions and delves really need to re-think the type of game they are playing. The continuation of this attitude will lead to gamers being OK with any game labeled "MMO" charging sub fees simply because they are online.
This game needs more reasons to be called an MMO. More timesinks, More group focused content that is not exclusive to raiding/trials. As it stands now, the players coming here expecting an MMO experience like myself will gradually realize they are just playing TES VI online with a fee and no real value added by the other players they may see on the screen...
Just my 2 cents. Carry on
Yes! And fortunately, you're not the one who gets to tell me how I should spend my time and my money.jambam817_ESO wrote: »Solo players... you're telling me that you would love to continue paying $15 a month for a SOLO gaming experience that FORCES you to be online?
Can I pvp in a offline singleplayer game? No... I play mmorpg pvp solo because of the awesome fun.jambam817_ESO wrote: »Solo players...
jambam817_ESO wrote: »Solo players... you're telling me that you would love to continue paying $15 a month for a SOLO gaming experience that FORCES you to be online?
In a word, yes.
But my thanks to the OP for his concern which I can assure him is entirely misplaced and based on a failure to grasp the difference between single-player offline games that are largely fixed at launch and soloable multi-player online ones that are constantly evolving.
jambam817_ESO wrote: »Solo players... you're telling me that you would love to continue paying $15 a month for a SOLO gaming experience that FORCES you to be online?
Yes. Unless you show me another game that lets me explore parts of every province of Tamriel with modern graphics.