wolfguard101 wrote: »On the other hand its nice that AD are so desperate to win they need to cheat this way and any respect I had for certain members of AD are well and truly gone.
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »A forward camp deployed behind an Elder Scroll Gate is not an exploit if it isn't deployed in a starter area. A forward camp deployed in a starter location such as Northern Highrock Gate or Eastern Elswyr Gate however is something our CS agents are looking at and actioning as they occur as enemy alliance players should not be in those locations.
wolfguard101 wrote: »On the other hand its nice that AD are so desperate to win they need to cheat this way and any respect I had for certain members of AD are well and truly gone.
This is where you're very wrong.
This behavior isn't helping AD win... this behavior, if anything, is actually crippling our ability to compete by reducing the number of AD actively attacking and defending.
Not only do we continually have an entire Guild (+) off farming... some of them are now exploiting to farm... lol facepalm.
Only a small faction of the AD have been behaving this way. The bulk of us are innocent, embarrassed... and openly chastising the guilty in Zone Chat.
tyvfm
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
Sigh...So it seems.
We will be back here in a month discussing the same thing once again because the real problem isn't being dealt with. The explanation for a house being robbed is not a faulty door lock...it's the thief. Install a new lock and the thief will take the window. Lock the window and the thief will break the window. If you want to stop the thief put him in jail.
Thechemicals wrote: »If you did this in Ultima Online you would be put in a 4x4 pixel cell until a gm dealt with you. Funny , considering the name of the guy leading this little exploit, knowing its a cheat.
Pixysticks wrote: »Sigh...So it seems.
We will be back here in a month discussing the same thing once again because the real problem isn't being dealt with. The explanation for a house being robbed is not a faulty door lock...it's the thief. Install a new lock and the thief will take the window. Lock the window and the thief will break the window. If you want to stop the thief put him in jail.
If only 1 thief ever existed in the history of time itself, you would be right.
I didn't ask you. As far as I can tell you don't run the game or the forums. Simply because they stated that they are looking into this to prevent the act doesn't mean that said act is permissible.ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
I didn't ask you. As far as I can tell you don't run the game or the forums. Simply because they stated that they are looking into this to prevent the act doesn't mean that said act is permissible.ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
I didn't ask you. As far as I can tell you don't run the game or the forums. Simply because they stated that they are looking into this to prevent the act doesn't mean that said act is permissible.ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
they arent getting banned. get over it.
I didn't ask you. As far as I can tell you don't run the game or the forums. Simply because they stated that they are looking into this to prevent the act doesn't mean that said act is permissible.ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
they arent getting banned. get over it.
Again that wasn't my question, and I don't care what your opinion is. Get over it and learn to read.
I didn't ask you. As far as I can tell you don't run the game or the forums. Simply because they stated that they are looking into this to prevent the act doesn't mean that said act is permissible.ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
they arent getting banned. get over it.
Again that wasn't my question, and I don't care what your opinion is. Get over it and learn to read.
you clearly asked the question earlier, and clearly got a response, you just didnt like it and thus all the anger.
relax
and again, they arent getting banned, get over it lol
Anger? Ok thanks for playing my personal shrink. I am asking questions. People who defend cheating are threatened by such questions.
Pixysticks wrote: »
Anger? Ok thanks for playing my personal shrink. I am asking questions. People who defend cheating are threatened by such questions.
I'm actually surprised you're still continually bumping this thread after how many times you've been caught lying in it, in order to garner attention.
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
Sigh...So it seems.
We will be back here in a month discussing the same thing once again because the real problem isn't being dealt with. The explanation for a house being robbed is not a faulty door lock...it's the thief. Install a new lock and the thief will take the window. Lock the window and the thief will break the window. If you want to stop the Thief put him in jail.
Pixysticks wrote: »
Anger? Ok thanks for playing my personal shrink. I am asking questions. People who defend cheating are threatened by such questions.
I'm actually surprised you're still continually bumping this thread after how many times you've been caught lying in it, in order to garner attention.