Maintenance for the week of September 1:
• [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 2, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 3, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 3, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 2, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 3, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 3, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
So is porting to a camp behind a closed gate bannable?
-
Armitas✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
Sigh...So it seems.
We will be back here in a month discussing the same thing once again because the real problem isn't being dealt with. The explanation for a house being robbed is not a faulty door lock...it's the thief. Install a new lock and the thief will take the window. Lock the window and the thief will break the window. If you want to stop the Thief put him in jail.
thats the stupidest analogy i have ever read in my life, you should be banned from having an opinion after that comment.
Let me know when you are able to provide reason rather than assertion.Edited by Armitas on August 7, 2014 9:52PMRetired.
Nord mDK0 -
Nala_✭✭✭✭ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
Sigh...So it seems.
We will be back here in a month discussing the same thing once again because the real problem isn't being dealt with. The explanation for a house being robbed is not a faulty door lock...it's the thief. Install a new lock and the thief will take the window. Lock the window and the thief will break the window. If you want to stop the Thief put him in jail.
thats the stupidest analogy i have ever read in my life, you should be banned from having an opinion after that comment.
Let me know when you can provide reason rather than assertion.
the explanation of why the house is being robbed, is that it can be robbed. if it couldnt be robbed in the first place, then the thieves wouldnt exist.
tl;dr you don't understand logic, move to a better neighborhood0 -
Pixysticks✭✭✭✭✭ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
Sigh...So it seems.
We will be back here in a month discussing the same thing once again because the real problem isn't being dealt with. The explanation for a house being robbed is not a faulty door lock...it's the thief. Install a new lock and the thief will take the window. Lock the window and the thief will break the window. If you want to stop the Thief put him in jail.
thats the stupidest analogy i have ever read in my life, you should be banned from having an opinion after that comment.
Let me know when you are able to provide reason rather than assertion.
I have to agree that it was an incredibly terrible analogy, seriously.Alacrity
Retired 05/04/15.0 -
Armitas✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Thank you. I assume that these things are considered bannable.
they arent, obviously, as they are looking into the methods used, not the players.
Sigh...So it seems.
We will be back here in a month discussing the same thing once again because the real problem isn't being dealt with. The explanation for a house being robbed is not a faulty door lock...it's the thief. Install a new lock and the thief will take the window. Lock the window and the thief will break the window. If you want to stop the Thief put him in jail.
thats the stupidest analogy i have ever read in my life, you should be banned from having an opinion after that comment.
Let me know when you can provide reason rather than assertion.
the explanation of why the house is being robbed, is that it can be robbed. if it couldnt be robbed in the first place, then the thieves wouldnt exist.
tl;dr you don't understand logic, move to a better neighborhood
False. A house can be capable of being robbed and yet not be robbed. It is true that if the house could not be robbed then there would not be a thief in the final sense. But it is the present case that it can be robbed. And it is the case that their previous attempt at making an unrobbable house has failed.
While a vulnerability is a necessary condition of a house being robbed it does not necessitate it being robbed. It is only a material cause that is contingent on an efficient cause for the final cause. The efficient cause can still exist even though it does not have a material cause for the final cause.
tl;dr My neighborhood is just fine, I would examine your own streets.Edited by Armitas on August 7, 2014 11:49PMRetired.
Nord mDK3 -
Cody✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭this thread has become interesting.
on a side note, I hope something is done about this cheating. I don't pay 15 bucks a month to lose to someone who is afraid to lose1 -
kijima✭✭✭✭✭
✭ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »@Columba
Yes we are looking into the ways people are able to bypass physical structures in the world as well.
Not sure if possible but an instakill feature for those that get past physical structures they shouldn't be getting past, along with players that shouldn't be in safe areas would be welcomed, at least by me.
Been here since Feb 2014 - You'd think I'd be half reasonable at this game by now...1 -
Lowbei✭✭✭✭✭the easiest solution to implement is to make the scrolls inactive until the gate is open, as the inactive function for world objects already exists, thus removing any reason for anyone to go there when the gate isnt openEdited by Lowbei on August 8, 2014 3:21AM2
-
kijima✭✭✭✭✭
✭Apart from farming of course.Been here since Feb 2014 - You'd think I'd be half reasonable at this game by now...0 -
kijima✭✭✭✭✭
✭Going behind the gate, jumping into stealth and farming players that are wandering by. Everyone has done that from time to time. (well not everyone, but you know what I mean)Been here since Feb 2014 - You'd think I'd be half reasonable at this game by now...0 -
Lowbei✭✭✭✭✭why would players be "wandering by" when the gate is closed and the keeps belong to you? why wouldnt they port somewhere?0
-
Aoe_Barbecue✭✭✭✭✭False. A house can be capable of being robbed and yet not be robbed. It is true that if the house could not be robbed then there would not be a thief in the final sense. But it is the present case that it can be robbed. And it is the case that their previous attempt at making an unrobbable house has failed.
While a vulnerability is a necessary condition of a house being robbed it does not necessitate it being robbed. It is only a material cause that is contingent on an efficient cause for the final cause. The efficient cause can still exist even though it does not have a material cause for the final cause.
tl;dr My neighborhood is just fine, I would examine your own streets.
Mirin appropriate definition and application of Aristotle's four causes. However, I am afraid analytic philosophy is wasted on these philistines
.
1 -
kijima✭✭✭✭✭
✭They do.
There is a burnt out building foward of the reds gate, it has a skyshard there. Plenty of people wandering around grabbing shards and just exploring in general.Been here since Feb 2014 - You'd think I'd be half reasonable at this game by now...0 -
wolfguard101✭✭✭the easiest solution to implement is to make the scrolls inactive until the gate is open, as the inactive function for world objects already exists, thus removing any reason for anyone to go there when the gate isnt open
OMG finally a good idea and comment from you. I agree with this one0 -
Armitas✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭wolfguard101 wrote: »the easiest solution to implement is to make the scrolls inactive until the gate is open, as the inactive function for world objects already exists, thus removing any reason for anyone to go there when the gate isnt open
OMG finally a good idea and comment from you. I agree with this one
He is capable of sooo much good. I much prefer this Lowbei.Retired.
Nord mDK0 -
Lowbei✭✭✭✭✭wolfguard101 wrote: »the easiest solution to implement is to make the scrolls inactive until the gate is open, as the inactive function for world objects already exists, thus removing any reason for anyone to go there when the gate isnt open
OMG finally a good idea and comment from you. I agree with this one
He is capable of sooo much good. I much prefer this Lowbei.
lol
Edited by Lowbei on August 8, 2014 5:06PM0 -
Jaxom✭✭✭✭the easiest solution to implement is to make the scrolls inactive until the gate is open, as the inactive function for world objects already exists, thus removing any reason for anyone to go there when the gate isnt open
It's actually a pretty brilliant solution. This is something that should have been implemented originally.1