Arsenic_Touch wrote: »As an aside, please contact customer support via phone. Like all companies, Zenimax is required to abide by the ADA laws that require that they make their premises and products, in this case virtual, accessible to all regardless of disability. ZOS can easily abide by this in several easy ways from buffing your toon to having a GM assist you in the quest. If the progressive history of Zenimax and ZOS is any indication they will be happy to make this happen for you.
Amazing how someone actually tried to take sony to court over it and failed. Stern v. Sony Corp., No. 09-cv-7710, slip op. at *4 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)
So where did you get the brilliant idea that the ADA required video game companies to do anything as you suggested?
In this decision SCOTUS upheld the ADA requirements that forced the PGA to allow Tracey Martin to use a cart while all other players were forced to walk. PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 532 U.S. 661 (2001).
Have you even read the court decision theyancey? I urge you to do so at http://www.onpointnews.com/docs/Stern-v-Sony_MTD_order.pdf
There is a huge difference between a physical locality, such as in the PGA case, and the "virtual" world. Physical disabilities do not apply to the "virtual" world like they do the physical one. For instance, a blind person cannot sue an online game manufacturer because they can't play the games just like they cannot file a lawsuit against a bookstore simply because said bookstore does not sell books in braille (as indicated by the justices in the decision in the above link) . Disabilities cause limitation on an individual's abilities - hence the name DISability!
Please, in the future, if you are going to try to use a court case to support your theory on something, make sure you are comparing Apples to Apples instead of Apples to Elephants!
Yes, I have read that order and I doubt that district judge's ruling that the handicapped have no protections in the virtual marketplace would stand on appeal. It would effectively gut the ADA in today's digital world. There is a long history of computers being used to aid the handicapped. Windows has had such tools embedded since day 1.
There is also a key difference in these two issues. That is that here there is no requirement to alter the game itself. SCOTUS used the same logic in the Martin decision. They noted that allowing Martin to ride was not an undue burden on the PGA. They did not need to alter the course for him. In the same light our OP is not asking for the game itself to be altered. A GM helping him or providing him a buff does not require rewriting game code.
There is an eight way foot controller available.
"Stinkyboard is unlike anything else out there. It is the revolutionary next step in game controller technology. Patented Return to Neutral (R2N) technology allows for lightning-quick, precise control, while keeping your foot in a relaxed, natural position. More functionality. Less fatigue."
http://stinkyboard.com/stinkyboard/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlMz2sCDCA4
Seems you sir are the [snip]. You obviously don't understand the natural tendency to COMPENSATE for loss of ability. Go to the following link and educate yourself!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlMz2sCDCA4
[Moderator Note: Edited quote to match revised version]
lycanslerwb17_ESO wrote: »fighting mannimarco, im disabled, i can only use one arm, so can someone tell me how to fight him this way. im a templar, level 49 and i just cant do it. been trying for over 1 week. tried all different skills, i use a dest staff. My stats are, Magic 32, Health 9 Stamina 7. I use a purple food, and my staff does 100 damage with 24 flame damage.
Please advise me
smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »
Seems you sir are the idiot. You obviously don't understand the natural tendency to COMPENSATE for loss of ability. Go to the following link and educate yourself!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlMz2sCDCA4
[Moderator Note: Edited quote to match revised version]
when would using a gun with your feet be a feasible option? I am so confused.
I mean, if it was a home invader you were targeting, you'd have to lie down to shoot at him, and probably wouldn't hit vital areas, (and give him tons of time to just take the gun from you etc.) And if you were mugging someone, it seems like you probably wouldn't be very successful lying on the sidewalk in front of your intended victim.
wwusterbarthub17_ESO wrote: »If you know someone in real life who plays the game maybe let them try it for you. I have a nightblade who got trounced with him also.
For you, you may want to look into getting a mouse that has a lot of buttons. When I shopped for one at Best Buy there was one there with like 12-15 buttons on it that may help you.
http://youtu.be/lLSCyCyaAoA pitdemon_ESO wrote: »O god, 2 lawyers are going at it.
I'm closing this thread before I get subpoena'd to civil court.
(OP, I use a Naga. I was born with a "disability" myself, I'm a lefty)
regular and lefty version: http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-mice/razer-naga/
dale_forrestb16_ESO wrote: »I had problems with him on my NB. I switched over to healing staff and it was a joke-fight. Also, the person who recommended an MMO mouse had the right idea. I use the Logitech one with 12 buttons for my thumb. I can't play any other way.
Good luck to you.

I've never used a mouse with so many damn buttons. Doesn't that get quite confusing at first?
I've never used a mouse with so many damn buttons. Doesn't that get quite confusing at first?
Yes, I have read that order and I doubt that district judge's ruling that the handicapped have no protections in the virtual marketplace would stand on appeal. It would effectively gut the ADA in today's digital world. There is a long history of computers being used to aid the handicapped. Windows has had such tools embedded since day 1.
There is also a key difference in these two issues. That is that here there is no requirement to alter the game itself. SCOTUS used the same logic in the Martin decision. They noted that allowing Martin to ride was not an undue burden on the PGA. They did not need to alter the course for him. In the same light our OP is not asking for the game itself to be altered. A GM helping him or providing him a buff does not require rewriting game code.
You obviously have not studied the law very much even though you would like people to believe you have. The ADA requires companies to provide a "reasonable" effort to ensure individuals with disabilities can utilize their products. Having a GM "help the individual / buff the individual" would not qualify as reasonable effort because that gives the individual an "unfair edge" over others. The embedded windows tools do not give handicap users unfair advantages over others because the tools are available to all. The point of the ADA, just like the point of the Affirmative Action Laws, is not to give one group of people an advantage over others, but rather to give them equal opportunity as others. In the PGA case, the individual would not be able to compete without use of the cart; therefore they were not given advantage over others, but given the ability to compete with others. It also, as I previously stated, was in the PHYSICAL world, rather than the virtual world and was not designed to give an advantage, but rather level the playing field. In addition to providing an unfair advantage not available to all in this instance, providing the GM to aid would also place undue cost on the company because, undoubtedly, this would not be the only disabled gamer needing help ergo more GMs would have to be hired in order to facilitate this absurd advantage!
all I see are mice that discriminate against left handed gamers!
dale_forrestb16_ESO wrote: »I had problems with him on my NB. I switched over to healing staff and it was a joke-fight. Also, the person who recommended an MMO mouse had the right idea. I use the Logitech one with 12 buttons for my thumb. I can't play any other way.
Good luck to you.
I've never used a mouse with so many damn buttons. Doesn't that get quite confusing at first?
EinionYrth wrote: »