naturally! whatever kind sir wishes! it may be something along the lines of official version of dance of death.Fully customizable?
Peter Jackson would disagree.nerevarine1138 wrote: »The more I read the OP, the more disturbed I am. This is not intended to be a joke or flame in any way: you may want to seek professional help. The scenarios you describe range from generally violent to sadistic. Those are not normal things to want to see.
yes, weak.So, if I don't want to see blood and gore equates to me being weak?
I'd say that equates to you being.. umm, 12.
Try putting up a serious poll.
you have painted such an exquisite image behind the veil of my eyes! mace especially, imagine brain parts stuck between it, your massive boots bearing intenstines and squishy sound following you when you lay your heavy legs on the blood soaked earth. fully customisable!The thought of blood covering my Orcs armour and dripping from his mace has me drooling. Sadly we won't see it.
what else, did you expect? no- because I prefer blue over red?
Exactly - the OP wants some type of blood and gore in the game, and he wants to "prove" that everyone else does too, so he only presents 1 option without it, and does it in a ridiculously biased fashion. It's dishonest and pathetic.
you call it ridiculously biased fashion, I call it 'reality'.depends on the rating:AlexDougherty wrote: »You won't get any more than pools of blood and maybe blood on clothes. The reason, the 15 rating on the game, the first two options would instantly reclassify it as an 18 rating.
Oh and the last option is insulting, people might just not want to see blood, it doesn't make them weak. It might be for aesthetic reasons, try not to prejudge in the future, or people might start judging you right back.
ESRB: M
PEGI: 16 <-- here would be a little bit of problem. but you can sell it in cash shop as 'dlc' and quite easily overcome the problem (just like CA did with Rome II)
To some truth might look as an insult. In my eyes they are weak. what do you mean by aesthetically? as if the bloody body parts should compose a pretty looking painting? if it is because they cannot bear the sight of it, well, the answer is simple: weakness.
Dead body mutiliation? there is none of it there but I do not mind some proper head stomping! And about breasts, well, depends on their size and armour. but with magick and swords everything is possible and considering their, depends, size on the chest then they are quite easily exposed to damage!After reading the OP again I wouldn't have a problem with anything except the dead body mutilation and cutting women breasts of. They are not something that would result from normal combat and since this isn't be a deviant sim they have no place in it. On the other hand where the hell are the burning enemies running in all directions when they start to burn and why don't they leave burned corpses.
and what might be the reason behind their preferences? I will tell you: weakness! they wish to not expose themselves to tension and intensive feelings. they dislike it, they are uncomfortable with it. they are weak! for them it is an unpleasant sight. negative stress.AlexDougherty wrote: »By Aesthetically I mean they simply prefer the game without the blood, they are probably strong enough to see it, especially with todays tv and movies, but simply prefer that they don't see it.
In fact apart with people with phobias or the like, most of us have no problem with the sight of blood, except when we're eating.
Dead body mutiliation? there is none of it there but I do not mind some proper head stomping! And about breasts, well, depends on their size and armour. but with magick and swords everything is possible and considering their, depends, size on the chest then they are quite easily exposed to damage!After reading the OP again I wouldn't have a problem with anything except the dead body mutilation and cutting women breasts of. They are not something that would result from normal combat and since this isn't be a deviant sim they have no place in it. On the other hand where the hell are the burning enemies running in all directions when they start to burn and why don't they leave burned corpses.
but yes, running burners are definately missing.
and what might be the reason behind their preferences? I will tell you: weakness! they wish to not expose themselves to tension and intensive feelings. they dislike it, they are uncomfortable with it. they are weak! for them it is an unpleasant sight. negative stress.
those who revel in it, they feel positive stress, tension and even conflict within themselves. rush, ecstasy even sometimes. but it does not work destructively on their psyche
AlexDougherty wrote: »There is the small matter that you can not say whether or not revelling in bloodshed (even digital bloodshed) has a destructive effect on your psyche. We can, you can't. Likewise I can't say whether it has a negative effect on me, other people can, but I myself can't.
I see two problems if we plant blood and gore in the game:
#1: It will make the game get a Adults Only rating (and possibly become the new face of the age-old "Kids and the Internet: A Dangerous Combo?" debate.
#2: It will likely make some people throw up (I'm looking at Grant or Kary from Mythbusters). This means they have to get a new keyboard which costs them $50 (which is unnecessary), or get a keyboard cleaner which costs $25 (again, completely unnecessary).
In addition, that would mean UI headaches and Visual headaches for ZeniMax. So, a word of advice: Just imagine the blood and gore.
Oh, and I agree with you, Tr1cksh0t. Something is wrong with the person who posted the OP.
wouldn't it be corpses? well, you could always harvest ears or other parts for trophies, Diablo 2 style."Would you like to pierce holes in their bodies..."
I kind of assumed you meant corpses on both counts. I have no problem with blood , gore etc as a result of combat but there is something to deliberate , F up and wasteful about corpse mutilation In my opinion. It is also the kind of crap that makes games really hard to sell and publish.
No, sorry, I do not trust you. It is exactly the reason repeated by me.AlexDougherty wrote: »[
Leaving aside your unfounded assumptions about why people might not want blood in a game, and trust me they are unfounded.
There is the small matter that you can not say whether or not revelling in bloodshed (even digital bloodshed) has a destructive effect on your psyche. We can, you can't. Likewise I can't say whether it has a negative effect on me, other people can, but I myself can't.
well, I cannot agree with your evaluation. but yes, there is nothing wrong with enslavement of the lesser races, and both khajiit and argonians deserve it.isengrimb16_ESO wrote: »thalmor snipmer
ah, so it is very obvious bait post because people who like blood and gore can write about it here? or because the 'no' option does not fit your sophisticated taste?Can a mod close this very obvious flame bait post.
1. not if sold in cash shopI see two problems if we plant blood and gore in the game:
#1: It will make the game get a Adults Only rating (and possibly become the new face of the age-old "Kids and the Internet: A Dangerous Combo?" debate.
#2: It will likely make some people throw up (I'm looking at Grant or Kary from Mythbusters). This means they have to get a new keyboard which costs them $50 (which is unnecessary), or get a keyboard cleaner which costs $25 (again, completely unnecessary).
In addition, that would mean UI headaches and Visual headaches for ZeniMax. So, a word of advice: Just imagine the blood and gore.
Oh, and I agree with you, Tr1cksh0t. Something is wrong with the person who posted the OP.
how would it be cheapening? how is it unnecessary if the people want it? the only garbage I see is a series of your posts and unfound accusations.
Yes, and unnecessary. Don't need to cheapen the game by adding that garbage.
Yes, I have missed it in reply but as you see, there was few messages to /r . Nap after work delayed it.Surinen, did you not even glance at my speculated reason ZeniMax won't allow it? "UI headaches and Visual headaches"?
Anyway, everyone has their own opinions so these polls are a classic example of the adage "You agree to disagree".
please, if you have spare time, read posts in this topic. I have explained my point of view on it. it is up to you to agree or disagree,daneyulebub17_ESO wrote: »What the hell does wanting or not wanting to see blood and gore have to do with being weak?
Do you have any idea what the word even means?