martymart76_ESO wrote: »Resistances/Armor are a wasted point to whom? Which class? Not to tanks. You are trying to come off as if you are an elitist gamer here, and elitist gamers routinely min/max and squeeze every ounce of bonus passive into their builds. I can see that for PVE DPS, but not for tanks.
martymart76_ESO wrote: »Resistances/Armor are a wasted point to whom? Which class? Not to tanks. You are trying to come off as if you are an elitist gamer here, and elitist gamers routinely min/max and squeeze every ounce of bonus passive into their builds. I can see that for PVE DPS, but not for tanks.
Thank you for proving my point.
Now go back and read my post, then read what mark target does. Thank you.
You are terrible at logic it seems. Mark target is a great example. It's not bugged. It does exactly what it is written. But it is extremly useless in a pve environment.Blackwidow wrote: »So, you want the fact that ESO has bad information about character stats give you some edge in your character being better than someone elses?
But, to follow your logic, then still would not know about this information if they did a respec, right?
You are terrible at logic it seems. Mark target is a great example. It's not bugged. It does exactly what it is written. But it is extremly useless in a pve environment.Blackwidow wrote: »So, you want the fact that ESO has bad information about character stats give you some edge in your character being better than someone elses?
But, to follow your logic, then still would not know about this information if they did a respec, right?
Why?
The answer is written all over the forums.
And this is why respec for money is a good thing. It will make players like you learn about the game.
No, nothing makes you. But if you don't respec, you'll be down 1 skill point; if you do, you'll be down with 10-15k gold compared to a player who did his homework.Blackwidow wrote: »It will?
Making me pay for respect will make me do my homework?
Golly.
You assume I don't do my homework. Mistakes are not the only reason to respec.
Also, and I don't mean to put a fine point on this, but even if you were right, which you are not, how does this hurt YOUR game?
No, nothing makes you. But if you don't respec, you'll be down 1 skill point; if you do, you'll be down with 10-15k gold compared to a player who did his homework.
It's a meagre advantage, but still, it makes players who plan and learn a bit stronger compared to those who haphazardly put points everywhere.
So yes, in this sense it hurts the game by taking away the advantage of those who spent time on planning.
If you dont think it makes the game easier look at the silver plate.
Yeah, I'm sure ZOS are banning gold sellers because having gold in this game offers no advantage at all...Blackwidow wrote: »How is your game better if another player has less gold?
Where does this advantage come into play?
Thechemicals wrote: »So the general consensus is that this is just a game and it should allow free respecs or cheap respecs and horses should be cheap so we can have them very early in the game otherwise it makes things hard and not enjoyable and can cause even cancellation of subscription.
If you believe any of this is right then any issue will eventually make you want to cancel your sub and/or not have a good experience. This game has a lot more challenges than cost to respec and a 42k gold horse.
Thechemicals wrote: »So the general consensus is that this is just a game and it should allow free respecs or cheap respecs and horses should be cheap so we can have them very early in the game otherwise it makes things hard and not enjoyable and can cause even cancellation of subscription.
If you believe any of this is right
then any issue will eventually make you want to cancel your sub and/or not have a good experience. This game has a lot more challenges than cost to respec and a 42k gold horse.
South_of_Heaven wrote: »Let's have infinite respecs and let's make everything free while we are at it! Because it will be more fun that way!
Blackwidow wrote: »
I get 6 total respecs from lvl 1 to VR10, if we were to get a respec each 10 lvls, then we would get respecs at lvl 10/20/30/40/50/VR10 for a total of 6.
I am just thinking of limiting it to lvl 25 and 50, and then VR5, VR10 etc etc, to not give out that many free respecs and keep a somewhat goldsink ingame.
It the lvls I am thinking of, I feel people would still have a respec at a good interval in the game, where they would not get them too often.
It is a personal feeling/opinion.
But I would agree with @merwanoreb17_ESO that a flexible respec system could be good.
Perhaps not where we can go in an choose a single skill to remove, but that we perhaps can choose to only respec the points in two-handed and get those points back without having to respec all of ones skills
South_of_Heaven wrote: »Let's have infinite respecs and let's make everything free while we are at it! Because it will be more fun that way!
