Maintenance for the week of February 23:
· [IN PROGRESS] NA megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] EU megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
· [IN PROGRESS] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] NA megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] EU megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
· [IN PROGRESS] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
Long loading times between zones, low disk activity, SSD makes little to no difference.
When I played in BETA I had the game installed on a HDD as my SSD didn't have room. I have since bought a larger (and slightly faster) SSD to accomodate ESO but load times seem to remain roughly the same.
Monitoring the activity led when on a loading screen there is hardly anything going on (barely more flashes than idle), and checking resourcemon there seems be a slow and steady trickle for eso.exe
So why is ESO not taking advantage of this extra speed? It makes a heck of a difference in for example DayZ and other games with a large map.
Monitoring the activity led when on a loading screen there is hardly anything going on (barely more flashes than idle), and checking resourcemon there seems be a slow and steady trickle for eso.exe
So why is ESO not taking advantage of this extra speed? It makes a heck of a difference in for example DayZ and other games with a large map.
0
-
0
-
Apparently something else is the bottleneck. It might be (video) RAM, or the server forces you to wait to load a certain amount of server-side game objects, in which case your computer's hardware has nothing to do with it.0