xylena_lazarow wrote: »If you applied this logic to the real world: it's now legal to punch someone in the face on the street. If the victim doesn't like it, they can tell the authorities to put that meanie on the block list. However, if that same meanie comes back wearing a fake moustache, it's still legal for him to punch you, there's just no way to know for sure it's the same guy.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »If you applied this logic to the real world: it's now legal to punch someone in the face on the street. If the victim doesn't like it, they can tell the authorities to put that meanie on the block list. However, if that same meanie comes back wearing a fake moustache, it's still legal for him to punch you, there's just no way to know for sure it's the same guy.
I would say a more apt comparison is someone walking up to you and calling you a bad word.
Which, if you are in the USA, is 100% legal.
SilverBride wrote: »
Well, at least not from "that" account. But of course, there are always those with multiple accounts....
wolfie1.0. wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »
Well, at least not from "that" account. But of course, there are always those with multiple accounts....
Zos does have the ability, and the rights per tos to suspend or ban all accounts they believe are linked or used by the same person. So even multiple accounts is no protection from a potential ban.
wolfie1.0. wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »
Well, at least not from "that" account. But of course, there are always those with multiple accounts....
Zos does have the ability, and the rights per tos to suspend or ban all accounts they believe are linked or used by the same person. So even multiple accounts is no protection from a potential ban.
Given how hard it was for me to convince ZOS that one of my alternate accounts, identical registration information except for the email account, was actually me so I could gift Crown items from the Crown Store... I question whether ZOS has any clue at all whether two accounts are used by the same person.