And i very much doubt an evil character would want to befriend the Vestige.
chessalavakia_ESO wrote: »It's easier to accept static or poor behavior from companions when they are helping you it's harder when you are helping them.
chessalavakia_ESO wrote: »With Vampires specifically you'd also hit the issue that many of the vampires in ESO are ugly. People are far more willing to accept questionable behavior from pretty people.
Blood_again wrote: »And i very much doubt an evil character would want to befriend the Vestige.
It looks like the Vestige is purely good in your perception.
I don't try to break your immersion. I just want to tell about my experience. It is just another point of view.
As someone who tried to look at the main quest with evildoer eyes, I can assure you that it is totally OK for lawful evil and neutral evil characters.
My altsfought Molag Bal as a revenge, a self rescue act, a plan to get the huge power (that one was failed
They laughed insidely that the Prophet is way more blind than he looks. They triumphed while choosing who had to be sacrificed for the amulet.
So really the Vestige can be evil if you allow it. And an evil person can be their companion way more easily than it looks, if you ask me.
but if your characters are as evil as you say they are, why do all of the dozens of other stories?
why help anyone?
is it for the tiny amount of gold each quest gives?
the Vestige is not purely good in my perception.
i would not have done the Dark Brotherhood story if they were purely good to me.
but if your characters are as evil as you say they are, why do all of the dozens of other stories?
why help anyone?
is it for the tiny amount of gold each quest gives?
Would they want to travel with me?
I actually am not, to me a dead body is a dead body and i don't discriminate anyone for not being murdered by my hand.
I actually am not, to me a dead body is a dead body and i don't discriminate anyone for not being murdered by my hand.
What a pity (and unusual not to have any murder preference). Are you sure there's no (how do they call that all the time...) incentive that would make you focus on murdering guild mages? Either that or Bretons.
Oh i do kill them, they're just not the only ones. That's part of my "all inclusive" mentality (i'm almost sorry for that very bad and probably inappropriate pun).
Would they want to travel with me?
@colossalvoidscolossalvoids wrote: »Yes I'd say two last things are the main reasons here, we can't have complex villains who you can actually understand/relate to no matter how bad they are through our lense or the lense of the setting as it's might be perceived as a company's stance on some current thing. Overall complexity isn't something they're chasing as it can be confusing for some folks.
I wouldn't say it's so much about "relating", more about understanding their motives logically. To see how things "make sense" from their point of view (which still doesn't mean it's forgiven in any way). This is something I prefer in fiction over the incomplex cliché of "baddie does bad things because baddie".colossalvoids wrote: »Probably the reason I've started desperately discovering other similar settings who do not afraid of being misinterpreted and just do their thing, as tes probably mostly a thing that's already in the past with it's best moments and writing (Morrowind for me personally).
You may have better luck in Eastern works. Otherwise one has to resort to private roleplay with friends who know how it is meant, I guess.
I actually find it concerning how the freedom of writing (fiction) slowly diminuishes because people can't take fiction what it is anymore but tend to interpret it as a statement about the real world. Many great works of literature deal with more than horrid things. Imagine they would have never been written because people assumed this would be about the writer making a real world statement.
Also, describing things does not mean supporting them (some people even seem to struggle to understand that). Not even if it's done from the perspective of a fictional villain.
colossalvoids wrote: »That's a sad state of things, people want either confirmation of their views by their media of choice or willing to search for problematic content if something isn't in their taste, surely there's a shade behind a curtain to spot...