I think "Dragon Knight" exists in the game because it sounded cool, especially to Skyrim players.
Battlemage would have been a better choice, as that is really what they are.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »Since Aedra are grossly absent from the game they rely on people to represent their will therefor there should be a class of knights dedicated to their cause, Aedric Knights. This is one aspect of the lore I’ve never understood, the lack of Aedric Knights.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »Since Aedra are grossly absent from the game they rely on people to represent their will therefor there should be a class of knights dedicated to their cause, Aedric Knights. This is one aspect of the lore I’ve never understood, the lack of Aedric Knights.
Templar. You’re thinking of templars.
Dragonknights aren’t based on the Dragons of Akatosh (which yes, Dragons are Aedric), they’re based on the Tscaesci— an Akaviri race.
Edit: Reading the lore article again, I guess the Tacaesci attribute the magic to the Dragons but that doesn’t change the fact that the origin is Tscaesci and the Dragonguard hunt Dragons. Its not a Dragon worship class.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »So that brings up another error. If the dragons are aedric then the aedra did not create the mundus. The aedra could not create the mundus and all that's in it then send dragons which are aedric to enslave the people then give people a thum to battle the dragons. It's preposterous.
DenverRalphy wrote: »I think "Dragon Knight" exists in the game because it sounded cool, especially to Skyrim players.
Battlemage would have been a better choice, as that is really what they are.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Dragonknights
DenverRalphy wrote: »I think "Dragon Knight" exists in the game because it sounded cool, especially to Skyrim players.
Battlemage would have been a better choice, as that is really what they are.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Dragonknights
Yes, and they should have been Battlemages, not Dragonknights.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »So that brings up another error. If the dragons are aedric then the aedra did not create the mundus. The aedra could not create the mundus and all that's in it then send dragons which are aedric to enslave the people then give people a thum to battle the dragons. It's preposterous.
According to the Anuad, humans were never created, but descended from wandering Ehlnofey. Also, dragons existed first.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »Since Aedra are grossly absent from the game they rely on people to represent their will therefor there should be a class of knights dedicated to their cause, Aedric Knights. This is one aspect of the lore I’ve never understood, the lack of Aedric Knights.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »So that brings up another error. If the dragons are aedric then the aedra did not create the mundus. The aedra could not create the mundus and all that's in it then send dragons which are aedric to enslave the people then give people a thum to battle the dragons. It's preposterous.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »Who’s created first doesn’t matter. Except to the dragons. In any case the lore is off it’s rocker
LukosCreyden wrote: »Dragon Knight is an eronious name, as the class has very little to do with dragons.
Giant back spike things, spooky ghost mode (with giant heart included), weird chain attack, earth magic for some reason... I have no idea what you would call this. Volcano Knight? Heart Palpitation Soldier? I don't know what this is.