CameraBeardThePirate wrote: »Not even just the gold - if they haven't properly tracked where items were distributed and haven't rolled back the accounts they were distrubuted to, there will now be people with PTS sets on live.
Sets that haven't even properly been balanced yet could potentially be circulating on live. That's insane from a balance standpoint
People on NA still have the extra currencies and items that came from PTS. ZOS could have been clever by closing both PTS and NA. [snip]
I'm a PC EU player and when my server shuts down, I either go play on NA or another game. [snip]
Now we have part of the loyal players that can't play the game at all. Most interesting content creators can't stream due to them also being locked as well [snip]
HatchetHaro wrote: »I predicted multiple times that they would do a full server rollback because the damage had already been done with the template characters' gold and items already in full circulation; a full server rollback would have been much less of a headache for everybody to deal with, and would have been the smarter choice. It would have resulted in something far more fair for everyone involved, with the extension of the event being basically the only thing they need to do to achieve that.
I was so confident that they would do it, because it would be insane to instead try to isolate individual incidents.
Turns out, I misjudged their ability to make smart choices.
Now assuming that they fix everything and I can log in on April 19th 9:30am, they will have to compensate me 12 Event Tickets, ~ 800 Seals of Endeavor, 476 Anniversary Jubilee Boxes, 476 Writ rewards, and 4 days worth of daily rewards for this to be fair in any way, shape, or form, and how do you think they will handle handing those Jubilee boxes out?
soulreaper1213 wrote: »@ZOS_Kevin , @ZOS_GinaBruno
Can we get an explanation as to why the decision was to lock people's accounts individually based on whether they logged into PTS instead of just a rollback of both PTS and Live servers? This issue is very severe for the PC/NA server but this fix is not encompassing enough. Gold sellers have already made sure the gold from their PTS characters that was suddenly transferred to live is no longer on their accounts. We are talking potentially 10s to 100s of billions of gold immediately injected into an already horrible economy.
Me and my raid team were super excited to jump into the new raid and made to sure log into PTS early to set up our characters. And now, more than half of our members are temporarily banned simply for participating in your PTS cycle.
I sincerely hope that this issue isn't just brushed off and we can actually have some communication because most players, myself included, would love to support this game more. It just seems like at every step of the way you are making it as difficult as possible to do so, all the while not really providing communication that will leave players with a relative understanding of your reasoning. I have played this game since its first beta back in 2013(?) and I think this is one of the few times your decisions and lack of communication has genuinely shocked me.
No one on the team is trying to brush anything off. We cannot provide a full detailed update yet without finishing our investigations and work on this. The last thing we want to do right now is give a half-realized answer. We still have team members working and looking to resolve issues. So when they resolve items on their end, we'll be able to get answers out to everyone.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »We will follow up in the coming days with more details summarizing what happened and will share any additional information at that time. We sincerely apologize for this inconvenience and thank you again for your patience during this matter.
HatchetHaro wrote: »I predicted multiple times that they would do a full server rollback because the damage had already been done with the template characters' gold and items already in full circulation; a full server rollback would have been much less of a headache for everybody to deal with, and would have been the smarter choice. It would have resulted in something far more fair for everyone involved, with the extension of the event being basically the only thing they need to do to achieve that.
I was so confident that they would do it, because it would be insane to instead try to isolate individual incidents.
Turns out, I misjudged their ability to make smart choices.
Now assuming that they fix everything and I can log in on April 19th 9:30am, they will have to compensate me 12 Event Tickets, ~ 800 Seals of Endeavor, 476 Anniversary Jubilee Boxes, 476 Writ rewards, and 4 days worth of daily rewards for this to be fair in any way, shape, or form, and how do you think they will handle handing those Jubilee boxes out?
PTS went up at 1730 EDT. So the sensible thing would be to roll back to 1730 EDT. But they're rolling back to 0930 EDT. Why? Most likely because that's the most recent backup that they have available, and they're not able to roll back to an arbitrary point in time.
If it was just an hour, going back to just 1730 EDT, I think a server-wide rollback would be a viable option. Would probably be easier and faster than restoring accounts individually from backup. But if you're looking at going back 9 hours, then it's very hard to justify that for the entire server.
soulreaper1213 wrote: »@ZOS_Kevin , @ZOS_GinaBruno
Can we get an explanation as to why the decision was to lock people's accounts individually based on whether they logged into PTS instead of just a rollback of both PTS and Live servers? This issue is very severe for the PC/NA server but this fix is not encompassing enough. Gold sellers have already made sure the gold from their PTS characters that was suddenly transferred to live is no longer on their accounts. We are talking potentially 10s to 100s of billions of gold immediately injected into an already horrible economy.
Me and my raid team were super excited to jump into the new raid and made to sure log into PTS early to set up our characters. And now, more than half of our members are temporarily banned simply for participating in your PTS cycle.
I sincerely hope that this issue isn't just brushed off and we can actually have some communication because most players, myself included, would love to support this game more. It just seems like at every step of the way you are making it as difficult as possible to do so, all the while not really providing communication that will leave players with a relative understanding of your reasoning. I have played this game since its first beta back in 2013(?) and I think this is one of the few times your decisions and lack of communication has genuinely shocked me.
We noted in our last update, throughout our communications last night, that we would provide a summary in the coming days regarding what happened.No one on the team is trying to brush anything off. We cannot provide a full detailed update yet without finishing our investigations and work on this. The last thing we want to do right now is give a half-realized answer. We still have team members working and looking to resolve issues. So when they resolve items on their end, we'll be able to get answers out to everyone.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »We will follow up in the coming days with more details summarizing what happened and will share any additional information at that time. We sincerely apologize for this inconvenience and thank you again for your patience during this matter.
We have provided updates here thus far. Again, we know this is frustrating. The team has been working around the clock to get this resolved so that we can provide answers.
HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
soulreaper1213 wrote: »@ZOS_Kevin , @ZOS_GinaBruno
Can we get an explanation as to why the decision was to lock people's accounts individually based on whether they logged into PTS instead of just a rollback of both PTS and Live servers?
HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
For the people affected, this is definitely worse than a server-wide rollback, which would be much faster and cleaner.
But the problem is a server-wide rollback is server-wide.
And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K isn't a great solution.
And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K was the better balance.HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
No one on the team is trying to brush anything off. We cannot provide a full detailed update yet without finishing our investigations and work on this. The last thing we want to do right now is give a half-realized answer. We still have team members working and looking to resolve issues. So when they resolve items on their end, we'll be able to get answers out to everyone.
We have provided updates here thus far. Again, we know this is frustrating. The team has been working around the clock to get this resolved so that we can provide answers.
imaslowlearner wrote: »HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
For the people affected, this is definitely worse than a server-wide rollback, which would be much faster and cleaner.
But the problem is a server-wide rollback is server-wide.
And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K isn't a great solution.
You can't say the 100k people won't be affected of the PTS bug, people have already said that the gold that was traded and items that were gifted have remained on the NA server. You are basically saying you trust zos to track down the illegitimate items that I'm sure are being laundered through guild traders while the servers are still up. The people complaining about progress on the forums have mostly mentioned tickets, endeavors, and style pages. All of which can be handed out like candy if zos chose to.
dk_dunkirk wrote: »imaslowlearner wrote: »HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
For the people affected, this is definitely worse than a server-wide rollback, which would be much faster and cleaner.
But the problem is a server-wide rollback is server-wide.
And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K isn't a great solution.
You can't say the 100k people won't be affected of the PTS bug, people have already said that the gold that was traded and items that were gifted have remained on the NA server. You are basically saying you trust zos to track down the illegitimate items that I'm sure are being laundered through guild traders while the servers are still up. The people complaining about progress on the forums have mostly mentioned tickets, endeavors, and style pages. All of which can be handed out like candy if zos chose to.
Absolutely I am. Everything that happens is logged. Every item has a unique identifier we can't see. They absolutely know where every single item came from, and can track it all the way through to its consumption or decon.
imaslowlearner wrote: »HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
For the people affected, this is definitely worse than a server-wide rollback, which would be much faster and cleaner.
But the problem is a server-wide rollback is server-wide.
And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K isn't a great solution.
You can't say the 100k people won't be affected of the PTS bug, people have already said that the gold that was traded and items that were gifted have remained on the NA server. You are basically saying you trust zos to track down the illegitimate items that I'm sure are being laundered through guild traders while the servers are still up. The people complaining about progress on the forums have mostly mentioned tickets, endeavors, and style pages. All of which can be handed out like candy if zos chose to.
dk_dunkirk wrote: »Absolutely I am. Everything that happens is logged. Every item has a unique identifier we can't see. They absolutely know where every single item came from, and can track it all the way through to its consumption or decon.
soulreaper1213 wrote: »dk_dunkirk wrote: »imaslowlearner wrote: »HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
For the people affected, this is definitely worse than a server-wide rollback, which would be much faster and cleaner.
But the problem is a server-wide rollback is server-wide.
And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K isn't a great solution.
You can't say the 100k people won't be affected of the PTS bug, people have already said that the gold that was traded and items that were gifted have remained on the NA server. You are basically saying you trust zos to track down the illegitimate items that I'm sure are being laundered through guild traders while the servers are still up. The people complaining about progress on the forums have mostly mentioned tickets, endeavors, and style pages. All of which can be handed out like candy if zos chose to.
Absolutely I am. Everything that happens is logged. Every item has a unique identifier we can't see. They absolutely know where every single item came from, and can track it all the way through to its consumption or decon.
That is just incorrect, otherwise gold sellers would not be as prevalent as they are.
HatchetHaro wrote: »And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K was the better balance.HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
My opinion is that those 9 hours of progress lost would have been mitigated with a 1-day event extension so everyone could still have gotten their tickets and rewards.
Keep in mind that 9:30am ET is only 3.5 hours after the daily reset, so not many people would have gotten their tickets already before the rollback target.
Much of those 9 hours also lie in the no-man's land of non-prime-time for most players that connect to NA servers; NA peeps would still mostly be at work, players in Asian and OCE regions would have been in bed, and players in the EU region would be, well, on EU servers. Little progress would actually have been lost.
dk_dunkirk wrote: »soulreaper1213 wrote: »dk_dunkirk wrote: »imaslowlearner wrote: »HatchetHaro wrote: »This sucks big time compared to the small suck that is a one day event extension and style page grant.
For the people affected, this is definitely worse than a server-wide rollback, which would be much faster and cleaner.
But the problem is a server-wide rollback is server-wide.
And if there were, say, 100K people who logged onto NA last night and only 1K who logged onto PTS (pulling numbers out of my derriere), then maybe screwing over all 100K (many of whom probably don't even know what the PTS even is; try explaining to them why they were forced to lose 9 hours of progress) to make things not quite as bad for the 1K isn't a great solution.
You can't say the 100k people won't be affected of the PTS bug, people have already said that the gold that was traded and items that were gifted have remained on the NA server. You are basically saying you trust zos to track down the illegitimate items that I'm sure are being laundered through guild traders while the servers are still up. The people complaining about progress on the forums have mostly mentioned tickets, endeavors, and style pages. All of which can be handed out like candy if zos chose to.
Absolutely I am. Everything that happens is logged. Every item has a unique identifier we can't see. They absolutely know where every single item came from, and can track it all the way through to its consumption or decon.
That is just incorrect, otherwise gold sellers would not be as prevalent as they are.
I have literally no idea how your response relates to mine. My concept of "gold sellers" would involve Crowns, and I can't see what your point is. Scratching my head, but I'd like to understand.
EDIT: Wait, you're just saying that each gold piece is "anonymous," right? I would stipulate that. But I don't think that matters at all in this discussion.