SilverBride wrote: »I agree with banning players that knowingly exploited, but what happened to the concept of innocent until proven guilty?
Banning players just because they deconstructed an item and received back the same amount of transmutes that was the normal amount for years now, without any proof of intent... then taking weeks to clear their names and restore their accounts is not acceptable.
If a player is suspected of exploiting but there is no proof that they actually did, then send them a warning that they are under investigation and give them a chance to reply. But don't ban them without proof.