Honestly the only person who should be banned for this is whoever signed off on the event going live with such an obvious issue.
it's so dumb.
as soon as i saw the event i thought what are they doing about deconstruction? literally the first thing i thought.
you're punishing the wrong people here.
the1andonlyskwex wrote: »sleepy_worm wrote: »To be fair, they did tell us to "make the most out of making things."
Notice that they didn't say "(repeatedly) making and unmaking things".
BejaProphet wrote: »the1andonlyskwex wrote: »sleepy_worm wrote: »To be fair, they did tell us to "make the most out of making things."
Notice that they didn't say "(repeatedly) making and unmaking things".
So you are like following this thread just so you can repeatedly chime in to express lack of sympathy? I’m not even mad at you. I’m just trying to fathom doing that.
Another one of these threads 🙄... here's my feedback for all of them. I've seen a lot of these types of threads all week across the forums.
Here's why theres a lack of responses from zos:
Customer service is overwhelmed with appeals and are recieving so many demands and requests. So it will take them longer to resolve the issues. The developers could be working on a fix to this bug asap. They're very busy.
Here's a tip:
Complaining about this won't get the problem resolved any faster. Instead it will slow down the process. It's better to be patient and do something good.
An opinion:
Those who intentionally exploit the bug and cheat deserve the penalty. Permanent bans are mostly for the repeat offenders. A week long suspension will expire and it's nothing to worry about. It's a less sever penalty.
Here's my response:
And I do agree with your post on having the extra stuff taken away.
So here is my suggestion:
If a player is caught exploiting a bug that causes them to receive extra stuff. For first time offenders, they should recieve a warning and their extra stuff taken away. Next time it could be a temporary or a permanent suspension based on the severity of exploiting/cheating and based on the repetition of that behavior.
Remember:
It's Zenimax decision if a penalty gets reduced, removed, or stays.
BejaProphet wrote: »the1andonlyskwex wrote: »sleepy_worm wrote: »To be fair, they did tell us to "make the most out of making things."
Notice that they didn't say "(repeatedly) making and unmaking things".
So you are like following this thread just so you can repeatedly chime in to express lack of sympathy? I’m not even mad at you. I’m just trying to fathom doing that.
sleepy_worm wrote: »To be fair, they did tell us to "make the most out of making things."
I am honestly scared of playing the game at this point.
Remember that time where mobs in imperial city were giving more XP than usual?
People that failed to notice got perma banned. I used to play with a friend that stopped playing because he got banned from this incident.
I dodged a bullet here, because I was going to reconstruct full 3 sets during the event, thank god I didn't
How do you expect people to know something is an exploit when you dont announce it anywhere?
Here's why theres a lack of responses from zos:
Customer service is overwhelmed with appeals and are recieving so many demands and requests. So it will take them longer to resolve the issues. The developers could be working on a fix to this bug asap. They're very busy.
When a developer shifts his blame onto the players, this is the way to the abyss. If we recall the past, there was an incident when a Luxury furniture dealer sold a throne for 0 gold. People filled their inventory with them. Probably today, in such a situation, these people were executed.
Transmuting stones were obtained within the framework of the event using the festive mechanics of the event, people did not consider that they were taking advantage of vulnerability, and thought that they were receiving gifts.
joke^_^ Next month, will ZOS give players Orsinium, and then ban them for getting free DLC that other players paid money for
The problem with this is that for example I thought whoever came up with this event would be at least somewhat aware of how the transmute system works. I did not take into account that people at ZOS who designed this mini event had no clue about crafting.The TOS are clear about exploits being sanctionable so it's hard to be sympathetic about people who spotted an exploit of this nature (effectively an item duplication glitch) and then dogpiled it on an industrial scale.
1) It's not affecting the economy in any way. Items created are account-bound and transmutes are account-bound. This has an operationally insignificant impact on the short or long-term economy of the game.
Yeah, that's a good point. And yes, this would have impact on the in-game economy. I didn't even think of that. I was just happy I could temporarily solve my chronic transmute crystal deficiency, had they not fixed it before I could even try.3) Some people were apparently using it to farm nirncrux - I'll conceded that this IS a bug that can be exploited and so I think temp bans are justifed here for the inverse of the reasons stated here. It is possible to damage the economy since nirncrux isn't account-bound and you can store an infinite amount of the stuff if you have the craft bag.
It's not an exploit to use a system that ZOS created in the way that ZOS created it to be used.
It wasn't a bug, and it wasn't implemented by accident.
If ZOS put an item in the crown store that they meant to cost crowns, but listed the item as being free, would it be an exploit for players to purchase that item? And would those who took advantage of the free price be exploiters deserving of a permanent ban?
It wasn't a bug, and it wasn't implemented by accident.
If ZOS put an item in the crown store that they meant to cost crowns, but listed the item as being free, would it be an exploit for players to purchase that item? And would those who took advantage of the free price be exploiters deserving of a permanent ban?
It wasn't a bug, and it wasn't implemented by accident.
If ZOS put an item in the crown store that they meant to cost crowns, but listed the item as being free, would it be an exploit for players to purchase that item? And would those who took advantage of the free price be exploiters deserving of a permanent ban?
It wasn't a bug, and it wasn't implemented by accident.
If ZOS put an item in the crown store that they meant to cost crowns, but listed the item as being free, would it be an exploit for players to purchase that item? And would those who took advantage of the free price be exploiters deserving of a permanent ban?
Another one of these threads 🙄... here's my feedback for all of them. I've seen a lot of these types of threads all week across the forums.
Remember:
It's Zenimax decision if a penalty gets reduced, removed, or stays.
Another one of these threads 🙄... here's my feedback for all of them. I've seen a lot of these types of threads all week across the forums.
Here's why theres a lack of responses from zos:
Customer service is overwhelmed with appeals and are recieving so many demands and requests. So it will take them longer to resolve the issues. The developers could be working on a fix to this bug asap. They're very busy.
Here's a tip:
Complaining about this won't get the problem resolved any faster. Instead it will slow down the process. It's better to be patient and do something good.
An opinion:
Those who intentionally exploit the bug and cheat deserve the penalty. Permanent bans are mostly for the repeat offenders. A week long suspension will expire and it's nothing to worry about. It's a less sever penalty.
Here's my response:
And I do agree with your post on having the extra stuff taken away.
So here is my suggestion:
If a player is caught exploiting a bug that causes them to receive extra stuff. For first time offenders, they should recieve a warning and their extra stuff taken away. Next time it could be a temporary or a permanent suspension based on the severity of exploiting/cheating and based on the repetition of that behavior.
Remember:
It's Zenimax decision if a penalty gets reduced, removed, or stays.
Has anybody heard of anybody or had their investigation outcome yet
Starting to feel like at this point getting one at all is wishful thinking