SilverBride wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »Where is the proof that a lot of veteran players left the game?
Not being able to fill pugs for trials, not being able to fill pugs for dungeons, barely being able to fill rosters for vet guild runs, root having issue with filling roster for running trials?
I've personally taken a pause off of ESO because of the anti-QoL changes, additional nerfs to nightblades in PvE whilst being the weakest class and DEFINITELY the aggressive gambling requirement in the stores.
I am actively playing and I queue for pugs almost every day. I have had no issue finding groups. And maybe guilds lost members to other trial groups, but that does not mean these players quit playing.
SilverBride wrote: »And there is no aggressive gambling requirement for ESO. I do not ever buy crates and I still play quite fine.
Recently there are fewer and fewer old players in the dungeon.
And recently, fewer and fewer old players from our guild are online.
What is the reason for this?
https://steamdb.info/app/306130/charts/
The Steam database shows the number of players does not increase but decreases after Epic Free event and the following Free ESO Plus member event.
Although Steam is just one of the platform for ESO, it might be still the reference value.
SilverBride wrote: »And there is no aggressive gambling requirement for ESO. I do not ever buy crates and I still play quite fine.except everything which looks good is in a lootbox. You want a mount? Lootbox. You want an outfit? Lootbox (or pay 200 euros for 18 lootboxes and get the costume). You want a new animation? Lootbox. You want a new hat? Lootbox. You want cool furnishing? Lootbox (except for the handul which aren't). You want a skin? Lootbox. You want a non-standard pet (which isn't a standard dog/cat/guar)? Lootbox.
valenwood_vegan wrote: »I would imagine that most in this thread (like I) were responding from our own perspectives and what we see in our own guild / friend groups.
While I can't definitively say that "veteran players are leaving", I can definitively say that the veteran players among my friends and guilds have left or substantially reduced their playtime, primarily for the reasons I listed earlier in this thread. And the overall perception among these groups is that the game population is currently down, based on rapidly falling sales and lack of players showing up for events / difficulty filling trial rosters / high numbers of players logging in less than once a week / fewer paying guild dues / fewer guild apps, etc.
And at least for me, that's really that's all I intended to say, I certainly won't claim that I have some deeper insight into the overall population of the game that would rise to the level of proof.
*EDIT: I should also add that I'm on PC/NA, as there could be differences between the servers.
TybaltKaine wrote: »I can't speak for everyone, but dissatisfaction with the direction of the game moving forward, the constant yo-yo nerfs and combat changes, the over correction of sets and skills based on niche uses in both PVE and PVP, and the ramping up of difficulty in new content while hamstringing the ability of the player to deal enough damage to compete when playing solo all seem to be leading causes.
I won't even get into the crown store and the predatory pricing practices born from it.
People walk away when the game they are investing into is no longer worth that investment.
SilverBride wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »And there is no aggressive gambling requirement for ESO. I do not ever buy crates and I still play quite fine.except everything which looks good is in a lootbox. You want a mount? Lootbox. You want an outfit? Lootbox (or pay 200 euros for 18 lootboxes and get the costume). You want a new animation? Lootbox. You want a new hat? Lootbox. You want cool furnishing? Lootbox (except for the handul which aren't). You want a skin? Lootbox. You want a non-standard pet (which isn't a standard dog/cat/guar)? Lootbox.
I have ZERO interest in mounts, animations, hats, skins, pets. I do like costumes but only get the ones I can get with seals. And I am big into housing but will not gamble to get a furnishing.
Supreme_Atromancer wrote: »CameraBeardThePirate wrote: »Recently there are fewer and fewer old players in the dungeon.
And recently, fewer and fewer old players from our guild are online.
What is the reason for this?
It's not "recently", this has been going on for years.
This game does NOT try to make players stay. It doesn't try to keep players happy. It gets new players to spend as much money as possible, and makes them leave after realizing some facts that i don't know how to tell you without violating the "terms of service" and "code of conduct" of this forum.
ESO had the potential to be one of the best video games ever, but because of reasons we are not allowed to discuss here, it will never be more than it is right now.
I'll cite a reason: how about the fact that one of the most prominent devs openly mocked a large portion of the playerbase, not once, but twice?
Calling players whiners because they're bringing up genuine, valid concerns is a good way to annihilate the relationship with said players.
It wasn't that dev's view, though: he'd stated many times that his wife's views were her own, and it was clear he didn't always agree with her opinions. I feel like she was speaking from the position of a wife who watches her husband cop crap regularly about things that are beyond his control. She had spoken several times about this- speaking from the perspective of someone who'd experienced similar things from other games.
As someone who regularly watched the stream, I saw the process whereby I feel like Rich started out super candid and open about any topic broached, and slowly had to become more careful about what he said, because more people learned 2nd hand about the stream and thought it would be appropriate to jump in and just start drilling him for hating PvP or the endgame community, with loaded or disingenuous questions. He got defensive. As did the community around him. People were literally celebrating Rich's wife's filter-lacking tell-it-like-it-is attitude.
Does that make it cool? Probably not, but I think the accusations need more context. People tend to just swallow it wholesale without critical thinking or relevant context.
markulrich1966 wrote: »I play since 5 years, though less meanwhile as mentioned before.
Just now, I soloed Old Deathwart, the frog WB in Blackwood. On a templar alt that was quite easy to play before U35.
I could finish the frog, but my wrist has started to hurt. I should not do this at the age of 57.
I usually play non-Oakensoul HA builds, and so can deal with such bosses without a hurting wrist, I just have not re-speced the templar yet (1 of 72 alts).
U39 will remove AOE damage from lightning staves.Then I will have to replace that like I just did with my templar, using skills like strikes. To be honest: I am not willing to destroy my health for such a reason, so this likely will be the point where I will switch to other games completely.
This trend is not new. E.g. sorcerers had a strong AOE, crystal blast. Was removed completely, so without AOE from a staff they rely on pulsar (staff skill), that does far less damage and has higher cost than the former crystal blast. Another unhealthy replacement causing physical pain for older players.
SilverBride wrote: »I do like costumes but only get the ones I can get with seals. And I am big into housing but will not gamble to get a furnishing.
SilverBride wrote: »I do like costumes but only get the ones I can get with seals. And I am big into housing but will not gamble to get a furnishing.
And there we go. For the costumes you're using the mechanics which ZoS was forced to implement by law to make it only 99% obtainable by gambling and the rest to maybe be obtainable by grinding for months for a lootbox item which might or might not run out before you collect enough seals because the lootboxes are 'a limited time only'.
And you are basically not getting a ton of custom furnishing because it's only obtainable via gambling.
That's what I said. It's too aggressive with lootbox. I'd spend way more money than what I did on ESO if I could just buy the darn things I want without gambling, and so would a lot of other players. It's a huge turnoff that everything good is behind a gambling crate.
wolfie1.0. wrote: »BG3...
Just wait till Starfield launches...
Interesting to see what impact that has.
SilverBride wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »I do like costumes but only get the ones I can get with seals. And I am big into housing but will not gamble to get a furnishing.
And there we go. For the costumes you're using the mechanics which ZoS was forced to implement by law to make it only 99% obtainable by gambling and the rest to maybe be obtainable by grinding for months for a lootbox item which might or might not run out before you collect enough seals because the lootboxes are 'a limited time only'.
And you are basically not getting a ton of custom furnishing because it's only obtainable via gambling.
That's what I said. It's too aggressive with lootbox. I'd spend way more money than what I did on ESO if I could just buy the darn things I want without gambling, and so would a lot of other players. It's a huge turnoff that everything good is behind a gambling crate.
I learned a long time ago that I can't have everything, in real life or in game, and I'm fine with that. There are still plenty of nice costumes and furnishings to be had that don't involve crates. I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything.
Where is the proof that a lot of veteran players left the game?
SilverBride wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »I do like costumes but only get the ones I can get with seals. And I am big into housing but will not gamble to get a furnishing.
And there we go. For the costumes you're using the mechanics which ZoS was forced to implement by law to make it only 99% obtainable by gambling and the rest to maybe be obtainable by grinding for months for a lootbox item which might or might not run out before you collect enough seals because the lootboxes are 'a limited time only'.
And you are basically not getting a ton of custom furnishing because it's only obtainable via gambling.
That's what I said. It's too aggressive with lootbox. I'd spend way more money than what I did on ESO if I could just buy the darn things I want without gambling, and so would a lot of other players. It's a huge turnoff that everything good is behind a gambling crate.
I learned a long time ago that I can't have everything, in real life or in game, and I'm fine with that. There are still plenty of nice costumes and furnishings to be had that don't involve crates. I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything.
But you can not seriously deny that the game would feel a lot more rewarding if you could get all that stuff through actually playing the game? I was seriously cringing when the devs on that life stream a while back had to pretend they were exited about customizable harvesting animations and stuff being added to the gamble boxes. There is so very little reason to do content, the only thing you get are sets, and most of those are worthless or very niche (the current build on my main consists of two base game dungeon sets...). Gold is useless: all the good sets are bind on pickup, all the worthwhile cosmetics and houses are crown only. The only thing that keeps me going a bit is some foolhardy sense of completionism.
I_killed_Vivec wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »I play since 5 years, though less meanwhile as mentioned before.
Just now, I soloed Old Deathwart, the frog WB in Blackwood. On a templar alt that was quite easy to play before U35.
I could finish the frog, but my wrist has started to hurt. I should not do this at the age of 57.
I usually play non-Oakensoul HA builds, and so can deal with such bosses without a hurting wrist, I just have not re-speced the templar yet (1 of 72 alts).
U39 will remove AOE damage from lightning staves.Then I will have to replace that like I just did with my templar, using skills like strikes. To be honest: I am not willing to destroy my health for such a reason, so this likely will be the point where I will switch to other games completely.
This trend is not new. E.g. sorcerers had a strong AOE, crystal blast. Was removed completely, so without AOE from a staff they rely on pulsar (staff skill), that does far less damage and has higher cost than the former crystal blast. Another unhealthy replacement causing physical pain for older players.
But this is round the wrong way. You are complaining that soloing a WB isn't as easy as it used to be!
ZoS's answer will be that you shouldn't be soloing WBs, they are meant to be grouped content. Therefore their nerfs were long overdue.
That you could still solo it despite the nerfs might give them the impression that they need to nerf harder...
Now you might say that you want to solo as much as you can, and I'd agree with you because this is how I mainly play, but ZoS would say that isn't how the game they've made is meant to be.
By the way, look at all the "overland is trivial" posts and you will see many people complaining about how easy overland is (including WBs). I expect many of the same people complain when the nerf hammer falls on them...
Where is the proof that a lot of veteran players left the game?
How about 4 of my 5 regular raid groups disbanding after U35? How about 2 raid guilds completely dissolving? How about the remaining raid people struggling to get 12 people together for sign up raids despite a completely new trial?
Would that count as proof?
There's no reason to do anything. ZOS doesn't incentivize veteran activities with worthwhile rewards. Most items that I want are locked behind RNG crates. I can't even get these crates anymore cause I would only pay for them with gold. I don't have the opportunity to earn good items from the content I complete.
Difficulty is another reason vets leave, a lot of the game is just too easy.
When some vets leave, it causes others to leave as well. There's no competition, you don't get BG queues, you don't find many people in Cyrodiil, you can't fill 12 man raid groups.
The devs have neglected the vets and it is really starting to show.
...content difficulty was toned down repeatedly...