Why exactly do you feel bad by looking at a group's parse you didn't even participate in? What has all of this to do with you and your gaming experience? Care to elaborate?
I feel bad because I've thought about all the other classes, and not even one comes close to DK. Not a single one! And I wonder why Zenimax doesn't balance all the other classes to allow them to have similar DPS?
Instead of buffing DK again in update 38, wouldn't it be better to buff all the other classes instead?
Why exactly do you feel bad by looking at a group's parse you didn't even participate in? What has all of this to do with you and your gaming experience? Care to elaborate?
I feel bad because I've thought about all the other classes, and not even one comes close to DK. Not a single one! And I wonder why Zenimax doesn't balance all the other classes to allow them to have similar DPS?
Instead of buffing DK again in update 38, wouldn't it be better to buff all the other classes instead?
What does it say?
How do you feel when you see this?
SeaGtGruff wrote: »
SeaGtGruff wrote: »
People treating it as a "professional sport" can be fun for them.
So, group DPS reaches 1K++, will it be 2K if they use HA? I'm just curious about it.
Don't be afraid of threats like this. I see no harm or any reason for you to go off-topic
VaranisArano wrote: »Is this supposed to be like that brief period after Elsweyr when the meta was 8 Necro DDs?
The usefulness of DK DDs comes and goes. I remember when StamDK had its brief heyday years ago and then got nerfed into very much not-the-meta as soon as skills changed again.
If your class is on top of the meta, enjoy it while it lasts. No point in getting salty when the inevitable nerfs happen.
If your's isn't, relax. You'll get your own brief turn eventually, and then everyone will be complaining about you the same way you complained about them.
ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »Nerf Oakensorc?
ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »Nerf Oakensorc?
A minor off-topic point:
I've noticed that in threads about HA, most players tend to advocate for nerfing it, even when its DPS is low. However, when the discussion is around the most powerful build in the game (and none are as formidable as the DK), it is regarded as normal and acceptable. That seems fair enough.
ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »Nerf Oakensorc?
Rkindaleft wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Is this supposed to be like that brief period after Elsweyr when the meta was 8 Necro DDs?
The usefulness of DK DDs comes and goes. I remember when StamDK had its brief heyday years ago and then got nerfed into very much not-the-meta as soon as skills changed again.
If your class is on top of the meta, enjoy it while it lasts. No point in getting salty when the inevitable nerfs happen.
If your's isn't, relax. You'll get your own brief turn eventually, and then everyone will be complaining about you the same way you complained about them.
I think the complaining or sharing of these logs is because Magicka DK has been the go-to trial class except maybe in like vAS since Deadlands when they finally got buffed and stuff was first starting to get hybridised (like using daggers on magicka DPS again) it's been like almost 2 years since then where they have been #1. Not that I’m complaining, MagDK has been my main since I started playing in the console release.
ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »Nerf Oakensorc?
A minor off-topic point:
I've noticed that in threads about HA, most players tend to advocate for nerfing it, even when its DPS is low. However, when the discussion is around the most powerful build in the game (and none are as formidable as the DK), it is regarded as normal and acceptable. That seems fair enough.
Meta DK is harder than HA (although, I think DK is easier than some other classes), and HA’s dps is NOT low. If it’s low, it’s because someone’s build is “wrong”. Anyways, if people were requiring DK for open runs then it’d be a problem. But people doing DK stacking are just sweaty people in sweaty closed groups. If this is actually HM then it’d make sense— RG HM is very hard. It’s a prog, especially Bahsei. Want to squeeze out the most damage possible to meet some of the highest DPS checks in the game and have less time to die. If this is just non-HM then I’m not sure what they’re doing unless it’s going to be a HM prog.
If this trial is extremely challenging, do people have to use DK to succeed or give up on achieving anything?
As long as it's not solely focused on Oakensoul HA builds, everything seems acceptable and fantastic.
Meta DK is harder than HA (although, I think DK is easier than some other classes), and HA’s dps is NOT low. If it’s low, it’s because someone’s build is “wrong”. Anyways, if people were requiring DK for open runs then it’d be a problem. But people doing DK stacking are just sweaty people in sweaty closed groups. If this is actually HM then it’d make sense— RG HM is very hard. It’s a prog, especially Bahsei. Want to squeeze out the most damage possible to meet some of the highest DPS checks in the game and have less time to die. If this is just non-HM then I’m not sure what they’re doing unless it’s going to be a HM prog.
What are you saying? Are you suggesting that we should only reward top-tier players and now we're including DK in that category? If this trial is extremely challenging, do people have to use DK to succeed or give up on achieving anything?
As long as it's not solely focused on Oakensoul HA builds, everything seems acceptable and fantastic.