I can only partially agree with you. Yes hoarding Is rampant for many players. I build houses and revise them and I do store used housing item as the can and will be used in the right "new to me " house to me. Add in the weekly lux vendor its an absolute necessity to buy many commonly nice/beautiful etc vendor items in bulk as well. This is not Hoarding its common sense for a housing builder, Yea I do have several several junk yard houses to store rarely used items. I wont throw them away because the are useful and needed items on some housing builds and hard or impossible or costly to get normally.
...the weekly lux vendor its an absolute necessity to buy many commonly nice/beautiful etc vendor items in bulk as well. This is not Hoarding its common sense for a housing builder...
markulrich1966 wrote: »TLDR: the problem often is not the space, but the "hording" addiction of us players. With a stricter inventory management you can play even without the double bankspace of eso+.
SilverBride wrote: »...the weekly lux vendor its an absolute necessity to buy many commonly nice/beautiful etc vendor items in bulk as well. This is not Hoarding its common sense for a housing builder...
I am a housing builder and I disagree.
I check out the Lux vendor every week and only buy items I have a current need for. I never buy in bulk just because they are on the lux vendor. If I want a lux item I didn't get sometime down the road I've always been able to find it on a guild trader.
ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »...the weekly lux vendor its an absolute necessity to buy many commonly nice/beautiful etc vendor items in bulk as well. This is not Hoarding its common sense for a housing builder...
I am a housing builder and I disagree.
I check out the Lux vendor every week and only buy items I have a current need for. I never buy in bulk just because they are on the lux vendor. If I want a lux item I didn't get sometime down the road I've always been able to find it on a guild trader.
As a housing builder...I disagree with this POV. When you buy coveted items on a guild trader, you sometimes end up spending double the initial value of that item. Purchasing items later from guild traders makes no sense when I can buy items I like for future projects/have interesting items on hand in case I'm inspired. I save a huge amount of gold in the process by storing things.
Storing lux items is a huge boon to any housing enthusiast, both in terms of building your own houses, and making sales. I can easily fund the purchase of more patterns for my homes by storing lux items and selling off a portion of what I have stored. Instead of someone else profiting off of me, I profit. In this way, my sales of other non- housing items can fund the purchase of other items I desire rather than being eaten up by decorating.
Its definitely sensible to allow the hobby to pay for itself by means of knowing what is valuable, stocking up, and reselling on the guild traders rather than being the one buying.
markulrich1966 wrote: »I donated the writs to a guildbank, destroyed the maps, and some old armor that was nerfed long ago, rotting in the storage.
With the ever increasing addition of new armor sets and housing furnishing and general non-trash need x of so many of this item to make the item ... Its time well past time in my not so humble opinion that we need to re-do storage. I am sure that server loading could be the rational behind not expanding our current storage but, that just seem to be a spurious claim and unless there are hard and provable numbers behind it, it fall the real reason check. At this point we need to re-do storage. I suggest that quest items/ get x of x items need to be moved into its own slot/tab and should be treated like the craft bag. Secondly I think there should be a dedicated bank slot for housing item storage or if that would be to hard/heavy a load on the server, that a Housing item banker be created and that he be located inside the housing instances only and accessible via the npc for deposit or from the build screen..
SeaGtGruff wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »I donated the writs to a guildbank, destroyed the maps, and some old armor that was nerfed long ago, rotting in the storage.
Somewhere there are (at least) dozens of ESO players crying out in horror at the irrecoverable loss of your unwanted treasure maps, which they would have gladly taken off of your hands.
Ragnarok0130 wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »TLDR: the problem often is not the space, but the "hording" addiction of us players. With a stricter inventory management you can play even without the double bankspace of eso+.
There's nothing wrong with hoarding armor sets when your dev team is [snip] ESO's team is regarding extreme swings in balancing for armor, skills, and sets. It's called preparedness especially when they're already golded out.
[edited for inappropriate content]
markulrich1966 wrote: »Ragnarok0130 wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »TLDR: the problem often is not the space, but the "hording" addiction of us players. With a stricter inventory management you can play even without the double bankspace of eso+.
There's nothing wrong with hoarding armor sets when your dev team is [snip] ESO's team is regarding extreme swings in balancing for armor, skills, and sets. It's called preparedness especially when they're already golded out.
[edited for inappropriate content]
they usually nerf sets in favour of very new ones, to encourage people to buy the new chapters. The old ones usually never are great again. Mothers Sorrow, Medusa, Necropotence, Iceheart, hundings rage were popular for many years. You now have much better alternatives, even ignoring meta sets. The meta sets will get nerfed somewhen or replaced by new metas (MS and Medusa were meta, sold dozends of MS staves, meanwhile unsellable).
markulrich1966 wrote: »... the problem often is not the space, but the "hording" addiction of us players. With a stricter inventory management you can play even without the double bankspace of eso+....
Zodiarkslayer wrote: »Furniture in the bank? Who does that?
Furniture should be stored in houses, because they do not bind to the account when placed. I use the three big base game manors as warehouses.
Zodiarkslayer wrote: »Furniture in the bank? Who does that?
Zodiarkslayer wrote: »Furniture should be stored in houses, because they do not bind to the account when placed. I use the three big base game manors as warehouses.
I dont have to remember what is where exactly. I just have to remember the rules by which I place them.SilverBride wrote: »I would find it very inconvenient to have to remember what is where and go back and forth when trying to decorate a new house. Besides basically rendering some nice manors unusable for anything else.
bank.
Well, that is not so straight forward. By not binding the furnishings to my account, the manors effectively become furnishing banks. A "furnishing bag" that @DinoZavr is advocating. That wouldn't be possible, if the furnishings bind after using (like equipment, for example) and couldn't be used freely after removing.SilverBride wrote: »I'm not sure what the significance of not binding to the account is. Some of my furnishings are bound and some aren't but they all are able to be placed in my bank.