It is unlikely to be considered stealing as that is merely a style, not an actual design that is similar. I doubt that is the first time that style has ever been used to start with let alone copyrighted or even copyrightable by anyone.
It is unlikely to be considered stealing as that is merely a style, not an actual design that is similar. I doubt that is the first time that style has ever been used to start with let alone copyrighted or even copyrightable by anyone.
It is unlikely to be considered stealing as that is merely a style, not an actual design that is similar. I doubt that is the first time that style has ever been used to start with let alone copyrighted or even copyrightable by anyone.
kumenit_taeynav wrote: »it seems as though the eso team has stolen the fanart from artist going by relan-daevath depicting Sotha Sil and used it for their Mercymother Body Art without asking for permission or giving credit! i dont know if this was intentionally stolen or perhaps the eso team simply mistook it for canon depictions of the tribunal from the actual games and just decided to use it.
i would very much like to see the response from the eso team and what they can do to make amends with the original artist, relan-daevath.
LukosCreyden wrote: »@kumenit_taeynav Absolutely. I bet what happened is that someone, maybe a contractor, was tasked with this and just nabbed something off google search thinking it was official art and called it a day. The fact that the wrong member of the Tribunal is depicted is enough of a red flag on its own. This was not checked over by ANYONE before it was chucked into the game.
As a lore nerd and someone who likes to support independent artists, I am doubly peeved about this and I shall continue to raise a stink on Twitter about it until something is done.
Matter will likely be handed internally and we wont see the results, [snip]
WrathOfInnos wrote: »What was the art based on? It's conceivable that both that and the skin were referencing some old Morrowind concept art.
chessalavakia_ESO wrote: »WrathOfInnos wrote: »What was the art based on? It's conceivable that both that and the skin were referencing some old Morrowind concept art.
From what I can tell, the style is based on Morrowind Concept Art but, I think that the actual details might be original to the fan art.
Here's the page from 2020
https://www.tumblr.com/relan-daevath/624076534773366784/vivec-sotha-sil-almalexia-almsivi-to-you
Here are some examples from UESP of the similar Morrowind Concept Art:
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Morrowind:Concept_Art
Reverse image searches for it don't turn up many results outside of tumblr which makes it harder for it to be an honest mistake.
chessalavakia_ESO wrote: »WrathOfInnos wrote: »What was the art based on? It's conceivable that both that and the skin were referencing some old Morrowind concept art.
From what I can tell, the style is based on Morrowind Concept Art but, I think that the actual details might be original to the fan art.
Here's the page from 2020
https://www.tumblr.com/relan-daevath/624076534773366784/vivec-sotha-sil-almalexia-almsivi-to-you
Here are some examples from UESP of the similar Morrowind Concept Art:
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Morrowind:Concept_Art
Reverse image searches for it don't turn up many results outside of tumblr which makes it harder for it to be an honest mistake.
The entire thing is original to the fanart. If you check the details you can see that the body markings and the original art are straight-up the same exact thing.
markulrich1966 wrote: »Copyright on Elder Scrolls is owned by Zenimax/Bethesda.
Someone may create tattoos for personal use if this is tolerated by the copyright holders, but he does not have any copyright on them, as this is hold by the companies.
Sotha Sil is integral part of Elder Scrolls lore and Artwork, so he has no right to complain.
The violation imho was done by the self-proclaimed artist, who used the artwork and lore of Zenimax as inspiration for his tattoos.
Btw. I'm not whiteknighting Zenimax, in contrast lately write pretty critical and even play Fallout 76 more often than ESO meanwhile, still copyright is copyright, wheather you like it or not.
markulrich1966 wrote: »Copyright on Elder Scrolls is owned by Zenimax/Bethesda.
Someone may create tattoos for personal use if this is tolerated by the copyright holders, but he does not have any copyright on them, as this is hold by the companies.
Sotha Sil is integral part of Elder Scrolls lore and Artwork, so he has no right to complain.
The violation imho was done by the self-proclaimed artist, who used the artwork and lore of Zenimax as inspiration for his tattoos.
Btw. I'm not whiteknighting Zenimax, in contrast lately write pretty critical and even play Fallout 76 more often than ESO meanwhile, still copyright is copyright, wheather you like it or not.
So what does this mean…? Does it mean that they can use any fan art and sell it without even telling the artist.
markulrich1966 wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »Copyright on Elder Scrolls is owned by Zenimax/Bethesda.
Someone may create tattoos for personal use if this is tolerated by the copyright holders, but he does not have any copyright on them, as this is hold by the companies.
Sotha Sil is integral part of Elder Scrolls lore and Artwork, so he has no right to complain.
The violation imho was done by the self-proclaimed artist, who used the artwork and lore of Zenimax as inspiration for his tattoos.
Btw. I'm not whiteknighting Zenimax, in contrast lately write pretty critical and even play Fallout 76 more often than ESO meanwhile, still copyright is copyright, wheather you like it or not.
So what does this mean…? Does it mean that they can use any fan art and sell it without even telling the artist.
it means he can use ESO grafics in unmodified or modied form for personal use like a personal desktop wallpaper or as tattoo, but does not have any property rights on the material he uses. So he cannot complain if anyone uses it again, as the only owner is the copyright holder.
Afaik he even had to ask the copyright holder if he may use and alter the material, before he had created the tattoos, as they are not only visible for him personally, but displayed in public. So I think he violated the copyright. A company certainly will not make a big fuzz about it, as it counts as "peanuts", but if he starts to suddenly claim intellectual propety on this copyrighted material, it might become a case for the lawyers.