I then translate it from English into either a Garlic, Nordic, or Germanic language, which are the European regions my ancestors hail from.
Redguards_Revenge wrote: »Would the name MolagBalls be ok?
The similar names need to be distinctly different enough, both written and phonetically. Again, circling back to the previous point about circumstance dependent. The example given "Razum-Dar > Rasum-Tar" is different enough written. However, it could pose a potential problem phonetically. If it was "Razum-Dar > Ralum-Tar", you may fair a better chance. The point here is, try to make the name look and sound different enough.
Next part is a question: is using the other part of NPC name (not family name)/recognizable part of property name against TOS? According to my friend's situation it is.
Is any people who named their characters something like (using single-named characters for maximum similarity) "Probably Not Fennorian" or "Caska of Beer" are in danger?
TooWeak2Live wrote: »I had a toon named "Fetaljuice" (obviously a play on Beetlejuice) for more than 2 years when it was suddenly banned. I read the guidelines many times and could not find any clause it violated. I asked customer service to clarify what rule it violated and they outright refused, in fact they were hostile.
Next part is a question: is using the other part of NPC name (not family name)/recognizable part of property name against TOS? According to my friend's situation it is.
Is any people who named their characters something like (using single-named characters for maximum similarity) "Probably Not Fennorian" or "Caska of Beer" are in danger?
Just heard back on this from Customer Service, @TiaFrye. Using the example of "Probably Not Fennorian" as it contains the name of a character, despite the name phrasing the name would be asked to be changed by customer service.
TooWeak2Live wrote: »I had a toon named "Fetaljuice" (obviously a play on Beetlejuice) for more than 2 years when it was suddenly banned. I read the guidelines many times and could not find any clause it violated. I asked customer service to clarify what rule it violated and they outright refused, in fact they were hostile.
Next part is a question: is using the other part of NPC name (not family name)/recognizable part of property name against TOS? According to my friend's situation it is.
Is any people who named their characters something like (using single-named characters for maximum similarity) "Probably Not Fennorian" or "Caska of Beer" are in danger?
Just heard back on this from Customer Service, @TiaFrye. Using the example of "Probably Not Fennorian" as it contains the name of a character, despite the name phrasing the name would be asked to be changed by customer service.
Also what happens if they "stole" my name?
I have a character whose last name is Nighthollow and has been for years before the Dark Heart of Skyrim. (I have a theme in which my characters names are {something that fits them}hollow. So like Stonehollow/Frosthollow ect.) So why should I have to change my name when the first time the Nighthollow clan's name is mentioned in TES lore is the Dark Heart of Skyrim?
tomofhyrule wrote: »@ZOS_Kevin , thank you for responding. However, I know a lot of people are still nervous about this circumstance.Also what happens if they "stole" my name?
I have a character whose last name is Nighthollow and has been for years before the Dark Heart of Skyrim. (I have a theme in which my characters names are {something that fits them}hollow. So like Stonehollow/Frosthollow ect.) So why should I have to change my name when the first time the Nighthollow clan's name is mentioned in TES lore is the Dark Heart of Skyrim?
What if someone a few years back had made a character named e.g. "Stefan Mornard," before any mention of the High Isle chapter existed. It's a lore-friendly name, so it's likely that someone could have chosen it.
Now, with the release of Galen, we have a major NPC who shares that name.
Does the person who had that name before get forced to change the name their character may have had for years just because ZOS's writers happened to choose the same name?
This is one of the bigger fears from this thread since many Lore-interested players are using lists of Elder Scrolls names to name their own characters, and there is always the chance that a similar or same name could then be chosen for an upcoming piece of content.
Are players expected to avoid using lore-friendly names to prevent this circumstance?
spartaxoxo wrote: »The name "Relequen" is used in ESO, and my interpretation is that "Captain", a title not a proper name, is not enough of a distinction. Now, if they had used "GinaRelequen" that might have been acceptable.
Also the character Relequen literally holds the title of captain. I don't see any real distinction between "Relequen, Wing Captain" and "Captain Relequen." It's just rearranging the way the name is presented in the lorebook. I don't think it negates the initial question that was posed. I think that question is worthy of distinction.
ZOS do have the database where all existing player-chosen names are recorded. It would not be a complex query to find out if a new NPC name was in use, and for them to respect their own rules in not duplicating names already in use. Then, once the name is picked, it can equally be blocked from character creation before the update that includes the NPC is released.
we do recognize that this process can be very frustrating, as many of you are just trying to have fun and bring your roleplay characters to life. For them to have a place in the world you're playing in.
ZOS do have the database where all existing player-chosen names are recorded. It would not be a complex query to find out if a new NPC name was in use, and for them to respect their own rules in not duplicating names already in use. Then, once the name is picked, it can equally be blocked from character creation before the update that includes the NPC is released.
If they can just tell us that is happening, then all those fears can be laid to rest. How about it, @ZOS_Kevin ?
JoeCapricorn wrote: »I've already had a character name appear in a later chapter, but he was a very minor one in the main story of Southern Elsweyr
spartaxoxo wrote: »The name "Relequen" is used in ESO, and my interpretation is that "Captain", a title not a proper name, is not enough of a distinction. Now, if they had used "GinaRelequen" that might have been acceptable.
Also the character Relequen literally holds the title of captain. I don't see any real distinction between "Relequen, Wing Captain" and "Captain Relequen." It's just rearranging the way the name is presented in the lorebook. I don't think it negates the initial question that was posed. I think that question is worthy of distinction.
Yes, I agree. The actual problem that @CaptainRelequen is experiencing here is that their @name is EXACTLY the same as the NPC. Theoretically, a promotion to @GeneralRelequen or demotion to @SergeantRelequen would be allowed.
But yes, what would happen if you had a name and then a new NPC got named that? Would you still be asked to change it? Could be pretty hurtful if you've had the name since 2014, and then you're told to change it in 2023.
TooWeak2Live wrote: »I had a toon named "Fetaljuice" (obviously a play on Beetlejuice) for more than 2 years when it was suddenly banned. I read the guidelines many times and could not find any clause it violated. I asked customer service to clarify what rule it violated and they outright refused, in fact they were hostile.