You do realize this game came out on PC first, right? The limited skillbar spaces have absolutely nothing to do with console UI limitations and I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that the UI was made for platforms that weren't added until like a year after launch. The limited space on our bars was intended to be a design option from the beginning, not because of UI limitations but because of gameplay.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Regularly I'm seeing last gen console users get blamed for holding the game back. This game is still going largely due to those said console users. I think the community should slack up on the negativity projected. No one likes logging into the forums and seeing thread after thread about how they are the sole reason that the game can't progress. And yes, I'm one of those console users. It's not like consoles are exactly easy to purchase right now, at least at a reasonable price. On top of that, the economy I'm part of isn't in a "ideal" place for me to shell out even the base price of new console. I bought this game on my current console, I see no reason I should feel bad about playing the game on said console.
Game dev's literally said in another interview (not the one quoted) that Console are the reason that housing item limit can't be increased and that it would be unfair to increase for PC and not console.
As we all know. Housing is endgame. So console is limiting PC's endgame experience
p.s. buy a PC instead of next gen you'll have a way better ESO experience and servers which don't lag so much (if you play on NA).
The answer for me is not as simple as, just buy a new PC. I enjoy console and prefer it over PC. I started ESO on PC and chose to switch. Servers are running fine for me on console. 😎
FelisCatus wrote: »Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Regularly I'm seeing last gen console users get blamed for holding the game back. This game is still going largely due to those said console users. I think the community should slack up on the negativity projected. No one likes logging into the forums and seeing thread after thread about how they are the sole reason that the game can't progress. And yes, I'm one of those console users. It's not like consoles are exactly easy to purchase right now, at least at a reasonable price. On top of that, the economy I'm part of isn't in a "ideal" place for me to shell out even the base price of new console. I bought this game on my current console, I see no reason I should feel bad about playing the game on said console.
Game dev's literally said in another interview (not the one quoted) that Console are the reason that housing item limit can't be increased and that it would be unfair to increase for PC and not console.
As we all know. Housing is endgame. So console is limiting PC's endgame experience
p.s. buy a PC instead of next gen you'll have a way better ESO experience and servers which don't lag so much (if you play on NA).
The answer for me is not as simple as, just buy a new PC. I enjoy console and prefer it over PC. I started ESO on PC and chose to switch. Servers are running fine for me on console. 😎
Buy a PC and use a controller? It would be the same if not way better than a console.
FelisCatus wrote: »Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Regularly I'm seeing last gen console users get blamed for holding the game back. This game is still going largely due to those said console users. I think the community should slack up on the negativity projected. No one likes logging into the forums and seeing thread after thread about how they are the sole reason that the game can't progress. And yes, I'm one of those console users. It's not like consoles are exactly easy to purchase right now, at least at a reasonable price. On top of that, the economy I'm part of isn't in a "ideal" place for me to shell out even the base price of new console. I bought this game on my current console, I see no reason I should feel bad about playing the game on said console.
Game dev's literally said in another interview (not the one quoted) that Console are the reason that housing item limit can't be increased and that it would be unfair to increase for PC and not console.
As we all know. Housing is endgame. So console is limiting PC's endgame experience
p.s. buy a PC instead of next gen you'll have a way better ESO experience and servers which don't lag so much (if you play on NA).
The answer for me is not as simple as, just buy a new PC. I enjoy console and prefer it over PC. I started ESO on PC and chose to switch. Servers are running fine for me on console. 😎
Buy a PC and use a controller? It would be the same if not way better than a console.
Except you can't transfer your account to PC and vice-versa and they also don't have any plans doing that too.
I'm not going to start from scratch, repurchase DLCs and lose whatever cosmetics I had because ESO love their FOMO model in their store. I'm going to play a different game instead.
Regularly I'm seeing last gen console users get blamed for holding the game back. This game is still going largely due to those said console users. I think the community should slack up on the negativity projected. No one likes logging into the forums and seeing thread after thread about how they are the sole reason that the game can't progress. And yes, I'm one of those console users. It's not like consoles are exactly easy to purchase right now, at least at a reasonable price. On top of that, the economy I'm part of isn't in a "ideal" place for me to shell out even the base price of new console. I bought this game on my current console, I see no reason I should feel bad about playing the game on said console.
[But it is the reason the game can't progress passed a certain stage of development.
FelisCatus wrote: »Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Regularly I'm seeing last gen console users get blamed for holding the game back. This game is still going largely due to those said console users. I think the community should slack up on the negativity projected. No one likes logging into the forums and seeing thread after thread about how they are the sole reason that the game can't progress. And yes, I'm one of those console users. It's not like consoles are exactly easy to purchase right now, at least at a reasonable price. On top of that, the economy I'm part of isn't in a "ideal" place for me to shell out even the base price of new console. I bought this game on my current console, I see no reason I should feel bad about playing the game on said console.
Game dev's literally said in another interview (not the one quoted) that Console are the reason that housing item limit can't be increased and that it would be unfair to increase for PC and not console.
As we all know. Housing is endgame. So console is limiting PC's endgame experience
p.s. buy a PC instead of next gen you'll have a way better ESO experience and servers which don't lag so much (if you play on NA).
The answer for me is not as simple as, just buy a new PC. I enjoy console and prefer it over PC. I started ESO on PC and chose to switch. Servers are running fine for me on console. 😎
Buy a PC and use a controller? It would be the same if not way better than a console.
Dark_Lord_Kuro wrote: »FelisCatus wrote: »Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Regularly I'm seeing last gen console users get blamed for holding the game back. This game is still going largely due to those said console users. I think the community should slack up on the negativity projected. No one likes logging into the forums and seeing thread after thread about how they are the sole reason that the game can't progress. And yes, I'm one of those console users. It's not like consoles are exactly easy to purchase right now, at least at a reasonable price. On top of that, the economy I'm part of isn't in a "ideal" place for me to shell out even the base price of new console. I bought this game on my current console, I see no reason I should feel bad about playing the game on said console.
Game dev's literally said in another interview (not the one quoted) that Console are the reason that housing item limit can't be increased and that it would be unfair to increase for PC and not console.
As we all know. Housing is endgame. So console is limiting PC's endgame experience
p.s. buy a PC instead of next gen you'll have a way better ESO experience and servers which don't lag so much (if you play on NA).
The answer for me is not as simple as, just buy a new PC. I enjoy console and prefer it over PC. I started ESO on PC and chose to switch. Servers are running fine for me on console. 😎
Buy a PC and use a controller? It would be the same if not way better than a console.
Or not wast hundreds of dollars for a pc to play one game
Pc player need to realise that lots of console player have no interest of ever playing games on pc
shadyjane62 wrote: »I'm confused. Are they catering to PS3 or PS4?
shadyjane62 wrote: »I'm confused. Are they catering to PS3 or PS4?
PS4. This game was never on PS3
shadyjane62 wrote: »shadyjane62 wrote: »I'm confused. Are they catering to PS3 or PS4?
PS4. This game was never on PS3
ty.

I mean... it was literally the developers who said so, not anyone of us.
Source:Q: Just to see if we can dispel one of the myths running within The Elder Scrolls Online community, is it true that you'd have problems introducing any additional skill trees due to the limited memory of old-generation consoles (PlayStation 4, Xbox One)?
A:Nothing is impossible. I mean, we do have to be careful. There's only so much memory on those consoles for sure and we have to be smart about what we do. We do have a focus on performance and making the game run really well. So there's a balance.
He is not saying yes, but he is saying as much of a yes as he is allowed to say. They are trying their best to make it work anyhow, but he would have outright denied it if the limiting factor wasn't older generation consoles.
Hahaha. No way.Kalle_Demos wrote: »Consoles and the people who buy them are holding gaming back as a medium. We cannot, collectively, have nice things because of your purchasing habits.
Hahaha. No way.Kalle_Demos wrote: »Consoles and the people who buy them are holding gaming back as a medium. We cannot, collectively, have nice things because of your purchasing habits.
Kalle_Demos wrote: »Consoles and the people who buy them are holding gaming back as a medium. We cannot, collectively, have nice things because of your purchasing habits.
SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Kalle_Demos wrote: »Consoles and the people who buy them are holding gaming back as a medium. We cannot, collectively, have nice things because of your purchasing habits.
You really think gaming would be as diverse, lucrative & fun if it was still on PCs only??
🤣🤣
EdmondDontes wrote: »SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Kalle_Demos wrote: »Consoles and the people who buy them are holding gaming back as a medium. We cannot, collectively, have nice things because of your purchasing habits.
You really think gaming would be as diverse, lucrative & fun if it was still on PCs only??
🤣🤣
Gaming was invented on PC and has always been better on PC. Yes, gaming would be more diverse and fun if it was more PC focused and less first person shooter gamebox focused.
EdmondDontes wrote: »SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Kalle_Demos wrote: »Consoles and the people who buy them are holding gaming back as a medium. We cannot, collectively, have nice things because of your purchasing habits.
You really think gaming would be as diverse, lucrative & fun if it was still on PCs only??
🤣🤣
Gaming was invented on PC and has always been better on PC. Yes, gaming would be more diverse and fun if it was more PC focused and less first person shooter gamebox focused.
The first, non lab, video games were Arcade games, and then consoles for home use. The first games invented on computer were done in labs as experiments more than commercial distribution like a modern video game. Definitely not PCs.
EdmondDontes wrote: »EdmondDontes wrote: »SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Kalle_Demos wrote: »Consoles and the people who buy them are holding gaming back as a medium. We cannot, collectively, have nice things because of your purchasing habits.
You really think gaming would be as diverse, lucrative & fun if it was still on PCs only??
🤣🤣
Gaming was invented on PC and has always been better on PC. Yes, gaming would be more diverse and fun if it was more PC focused and less first person shooter gamebox focused.
The first, non lab, video games were Arcade games, and then consoles for home use. The first games invented on computer were done in labs as experiments more than commercial distribution like a modern video game. Definitely not PCs.
Nope. Even Pong was invented on PC then put into a "gamebox" for home users. I guess you could argue pinball was around first, and there were pinball arcades.