Dark_Lord_Kuro wrote: »You cant be a fake dps, just a really bad one
You did dammage? Job accomplished! Now do it better
Same apply for every role
starkerealm wrote: »
But when it comes to the context people use the term 'fake' for around here most of the time, then no, I wouldn't call people fake DDs, just bad ones.
Agreed. Same for healers, I don't need that roles anyway. I do it all on my own if needed. Never got why PvE players even complain about that. If they would be better players, they wouldn't need Healers or Tanks.
Yes, but as long as they are actually doing some damage then they have succeeded by this definition. None of us actually set the standard of what is acceptable damage unless we decide to actually form the group vs ask the game to do it for us.
spartaxoxo wrote: »
Yes, but as long as they are actually doing some damage then they have succeeded by this definition. None of us actually set the standard of what is acceptable damage unless we decide to actually form the group vs ask the game to do it for us.
The game itself sets the standard. You literally cannot complete the dungeon if you don't meet it. It's the same level of impossibility as bringing in a level 20. You cannot possibly pull your own weight on a 15k dps check when you have 5k dps. You cannot actually do your role in the dungeon, which is to focus on damage to meet any dungeon dps checks.
Everyone does damage. Your armor can passively do damage. My pets can do damage. I can go afk and do damage. Doing damage is NOT what makes a dps. A dps focuses on damage, so as to meet dps checks. That's their unique job in the group. That's how ZOS designed their dungeons.
spartaxoxo wrote: »
Yes, but as long as they are actually doing some damage then they have succeeded by this definition. None of us actually set the standard of what is acceptable damage unless we decide to actually form the group vs ask the game to do it for us.
The game itself sets the standard. You literally cannot complete the dungeon if you don't meet it. It's the same level of impossibility as bringing in a level 20. You cannot possibly pull your own weight on a 15k dps check when you have 5k dps. You cannot actually do your role in the dungeon, which is to focus on damage to meet any dungeon dps checks.
Everyone does damage. Your armor can passively do damage. My pets can do damage. I can go afk and do damage. Doing damage is NOT what makes a dps. A dps focuses on damage, so as to meet dps checks. That's their unique job in the group. That's how ZOS designed their dungeons.
Oh yes, I agree that the game sets the standard with fights that do have some sort of time limit or healing of the boss. However, my comment was clearly more in line that none of us set the standard of what constitutes a DD unless we are forming the group vs asking the game to set us up with random players.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »
Yes, but as long as they are actually doing some damage then they have succeeded by this definition. None of us actually set the standard of what is acceptable damage unless we decide to actually form the group vs ask the game to do it for us.
The game itself sets the standard. You literally cannot complete the dungeon if you don't meet it. It's the same level of impossibility as bringing in a level 20. You cannot possibly pull your own weight on a 15k dps check when you have 5k dps. You cannot actually do your role in the dungeon, which is to focus on damage to meet any dungeon dps checks.
Everyone does damage. Your armor can passively do damage. My pets can do damage. I can go afk and do damage. Doing damage is NOT what makes a dps. A dps focuses on damage, so as to meet dps checks. That's their unique job in the group. That's how ZOS designed their dungeons.
Oh yes, I agree that the game sets the standard with fights that do have some sort of time limit or healing of the boss. However, my comment was clearly more in line that none of us set the standard of what constitutes a DD unless we are forming the group vs asking the game to set us up with random players.
But the standard most often requested is the standard of the dungeon. And people only call people fake when they don't meet the standard of the dungeon.
This is then falsely claimed to be the person wanting that person out of the queue because they don't meet the dungeons standards as having your own standard. It's not our standard. We didn't put the dps checks in the game.
The person saying fake usually NOT set that standard. It's false to call it their standard. And is basically used to attack the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.
There are some delusional people that think people should be hitting like 40k or whatever, but that's by far the minority. Most of the suggestions I have seen between 15k-25k range, which is literally just the range required by the dungeons.
The CP requirement for vet dungeons needs to be increased.
The CP requirement for vet dungeons needs to be increased.
Higher CP requirement will do nothing. I have seen 1.2k+ CP light attack Legolas bow spammers (vDoM btw, not even a normal vet, but a vet dlc). what we need, is in-game role tutorials with different difficulty levels. that's all. A non judgemental solo environment to learn your role.
PS: there is also the other side of the scale, I have completed vFV with 160 170 and 300 CP's teammates. Don't ask me how they got there, dungeon finder works in mysterious ways.
amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »It's simple:
Fake tanks or healers are "fake" because they are people who are playing alternate roles instead of the one they queue'd for. There is no intention of playing the tank or healer responsibilities.
"Fake DD's" still intend to do their role, they just either can't or don't know how to fulfill that role up to standards. In that regard, they aren't "fake", they are inept.
So no, Fake DPS is not a thing. Not to the equivalent of fake tanks and healers.
amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »It's simple:
Fake tanks or healers are "fake" because they are people who are playing alternate roles instead of the one they queue'd for. There is no intention of playing the tank or healer responsibilities.
"Fake DD's" still intend to do their role, they just either can't or don't know how to fulfill that role up to standards. In that regard, they aren't "fake", they are inept.
So no, Fake DPS is not a thing. Not to the equivalent of fake tanks and healers.
So a tank that intends to tank by drawing agro through damage is not a fake tank because he plans on tanking? Same way ignorance to the law doesn't make you legally immune, not being aware of what your role should entail doesn't make you not fake if you don't do that.
amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »It's simple:
Fake tanks or healers are "fake" because they are people who are playing alternate roles instead of the one they queue'd for. There is no intention of playing the tank or healer responsibilities.
"Fake DD's" still intend to do their role, they just either can't or don't know how to fulfill that role up to standards. In that regard, they aren't "fake", they are inept.
So no, Fake DPS is not a thing. Not to the equivalent of fake tanks and healers.
So a tank that intends to tank by drawing agro through damage is not a fake tank because he plans on tanking? Same way ignorance to the law doesn't make you legally immune, not being aware of what your role should entail doesn't make you not fake if you don't do that.
If you have a build that can maintain aggro, then sure. I have tank builds that maintain aggro without a single taunt ability on either bar.
amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »It's simple:
Fake tanks or healers are "fake" because they are people who are playing alternate roles instead of the one they queue'd for. There is no intention of playing the tank or healer responsibilities.
"Fake DD's" still intend to do their role, they just either can't or don't know how to fulfill that role up to standards. In that regard, they aren't "fake", they are inept.
So no, Fake DPS is not a thing. Not to the equivalent of fake tanks and healers.
So a tank that intends to tank by drawing agro through damage is not a fake tank because he plans on tanking? Same way ignorance to the law doesn't make you legally immune, not being aware of what your role should entail doesn't make you not fake if you don't do that.
If you have a build that can maintain aggro, then sure. I have tank builds that maintain aggro without a single taunt ability on either bar.
No no.... You don't get it. They came from wow. Heard that dk is a tank class. And are running 2h dk while trying to keep agro with damage. Without building into it naturally.
amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »It's simple:
Fake tanks or healers are "fake" because they are people who are playing alternate roles instead of the one they queue'd for. There is no intention of playing the tank or healer responsibilities.
"Fake DD's" still intend to do their role, they just either can't or don't know how to fulfill that role up to standards. In that regard, they aren't "fake", they are inept.
So no, Fake DPS is not a thing. Not to the equivalent of fake tanks and healers.
So a tank that intends to tank by drawing agro through damage is not a fake tank because he plans on tanking? Same way ignorance to the law doesn't make you legally immune, not being aware of what your role should entail doesn't make you not fake if you don't do that.
If you have a build that can maintain aggro, then sure. I have tank builds that maintain aggro without a single taunt ability on either bar.
No no.... You don't get it. They came from wow. Heard that dk is a tank class. And are running 2h dk while trying to keep agro with damage. Without building into it naturally.
Then it sounds like he needs to learn the mechanics of the game but it sounds like he's at least trying to play the role.
When I started ESO, I tried to tank with a 2h too. I wasn't faking anything, and still frequently got the job done. I just needed to learn
amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »It's simple:
Fake tanks or healers are "fake" because they are people who are playing alternate roles instead of the one they queue'd for. There is no intention of playing the tank or healer responsibilities.
"Fake DD's" still intend to do their role, they just either can't or don't know how to fulfill that role up to standards. In that regard, they aren't "fake", they are inept.
So no, Fake DPS is not a thing. Not to the equivalent of fake tanks and healers.
So a tank that intends to tank by drawing agro through damage is not a fake tank because he plans on tanking? Same way ignorance to the law doesn't make you legally immune, not being aware of what your role should entail doesn't make you not fake if you don't do that.
If you have a build that can maintain aggro, then sure. I have tank builds that maintain aggro without a single taunt ability on either bar.