myskyrim26 wrote: »If you want PVE Cyrodiil go boot up Oblivion and play it there 😀
You totally don't get the idea why PVE players want a PVE Cyrodiil. look, There's a lot of LORE in Cyrodiil. It is not about hitting buttons and killing mobs. It is about exploration and the lore.
ESO events take place in 2E 582.
TES Oblivion events take place in 3E 433.
So, how we are supposed to substitute Cyrodiil of 2E 582 by Cyrodiil of 3E 433?
Unfortunately, most people appear to think that the Cyrodiil quests, skyshards, lorebooks and branch of the Master Angler achievement are worth more suffering than all the other similar ones in the rest of the game. There is always the insistence that they are not like other quests or skyshards that are to be gained with as much effort as they took to complete or find, but are instead rewards for having to be bullied with hate whispers and teabagging. To skip that pain would apparently be game-breaking. There's screaming from PvP fans every time someone asks about this.
myskyrim26 wrote: »If you want PVE Cyrodiil go boot up Oblivion and play it there 😀
You totally don't get the idea why PVE players want a PVE Cyrodiil. look, There's a lot of LORE in Cyrodiil. It is not about hitting buttons and killing mobs. It is about exploration and the lore.
ESO events take place in 2E 582.
TES Oblivion events take place in 3E 433.
So, how we are supposed to substitute Cyrodiil of 2E 582 by Cyrodiil of 3E 433?
athena9205 wrote: »There are others like me that don't like to PVP but do like to quest, and cyrodil is a huge zone to check out. Can we get a server for cyrodil that is just PVE, no fighting players, all gates open, all towns and villages receptive and all monsters ready to kill in cooperative groups. The idea is to have skyshard running players and questing players go on this server and leave the PVP'ers to their 'fun' in other cyrodil servers. This should reduce the load on those servers a bit too. You could even make its story take place after the 3 banner war where the alliance is holding and the daedra are vanquished.
Thoughts?
i have the theory that most pvp'ers are objecting to this suggestion because part of their fun in cyro is killing those pve 'casuals' that only come to cyro to explore and get skyshards
on a more serious note, if that is not it, then i really don't see why pve'ers shouldnt get their own version of cyro. it takes NOTHING away from pvp (except for said easy kills).
the whole "if pve'ers get cyro then we have to get to pvp in overland!!!1!" is absurd to me and a kindergarden mentality honestly.
let's face it - pvp has always been neglected by zos and most definitely will always be. the majority of the playerbase is there for the quests and other pve content, and since pvp doesn't make zos much $$$ they will never give it the attention it deserves
Crazyprophet wrote: »I'd support it honestly.
World of Warcraft has a "War mode" whereby you can essentially opt in to world-pvp anywhere in the world.
I'd love to see something like that for ESO. Give us a PvE and PvP version of the world as a whole. That way the PvP community gets something new (imagine PvPing in new content, that'd be pretty mad!) and the PvE community gets to see Cyrodiil and some of the Alliance-War story without needing to PvP.
Greater accessibility for all!
Crazyprophet wrote: »I'd support it honestly.
World of Warcraft has a "War mode" whereby you can essentially opt in to world-pvp anywhere in the world.
I'd love to see something like that for ESO. Give us a PvE and PvP version of the world as a whole. That way the PvP community gets something new (imagine PvPing in new content, that'd be pretty mad!) and the PvE community gets to see Cyrodiil and some of the Alliance-War story without needing to PvP.
Greater accessibility for all!
what i dont understand is almost everyone that moves FROM wow want to make eso like wow, but wont play it themself
Goregrinder wrote: »Crazyprophet wrote: »I'd support it honestly.
World of Warcraft has a "War mode" whereby you can essentially opt in to world-pvp anywhere in the world.
I'd love to see something like that for ESO. Give us a PvE and PvP version of the world as a whole. That way the PvP community gets something new (imagine PvPing in new content, that'd be pretty mad!) and the PvE community gets to see Cyrodiil and some of the Alliance-War story without needing to PvP.
Greater accessibility for all!
what i dont understand is almost everyone that moves FROM wow want to make eso like wow, but wont play it themself
I mean, if you want to play a game like WoW, why not just play WoW right?
Goregrinder wrote: »Crazyprophet wrote: »I'd support it honestly.
World of Warcraft has a "War mode" whereby you can essentially opt in to world-pvp anywhere in the world.
I'd love to see something like that for ESO. Give us a PvE and PvP version of the world as a whole. That way the PvP community gets something new (imagine PvPing in new content, that'd be pretty mad!) and the PvE community gets to see Cyrodiil and some of the Alliance-War story without needing to PvP.
Greater accessibility for all!
what i dont understand is almost everyone that moves FROM wow want to make eso like wow, but wont play it themself
I mean, if you want to play a game like WoW, why not just play WoW right?
Itst not about making ESO like WoW, its about taking the good stuff from other mmo`s and incorporate it in your mmo of choice.
If something is good, why wont you want to have it?
Been asked for a million times.
Dont think you are ever going to see it happen.
Might want to be careful what you ask for.
The fans of open world PVP will say they would support it if open world PVP be enabled in every other map.
We dont want that either.
Been asked for a million times.
Dont think you are ever going to see it happen.
Might want to be careful what you ask for.
The fans of open world PVP will say they would support it if open world PVP be enabled in every other map.
We dont want that either.
The PvP community's idea of equality is hardly fair in practice however. A separate non-PvP Campaign for Cyrodiil still gives PvP their own space as usually. All it would do is take away all of their easy targets.
In comparison, enabling open world PvP in every zone, would effectively kill the game. PvE consists of a majority of the player base and forcing them all into a scenario where they'll be hunted down relentlessly for free AP by the tryhards just for trying to Quest or farm would make them drop ESO faster than any bug or performance issue ever could.
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »@BlueRaven I summon you. Curious about your opinion on that.
Been asked for a million times.
Dont think you are ever going to see it happen.
Might want to be careful what you ask for.
The fans of open world PVP will say they would support it if open world PVP be enabled in every other map.
We dont want that either.
The PvP community's idea of equality is hardly fair in practice however. A separate non-PvP Campaign for Cyrodiil still gives PvP their own space as usually. All it would do is take away all of their easy targets.
In comparison, enabling open world PvP in every zone, would effectively kill the game. PvE consists of a majority of the player base and forcing them all into a scenario where they'll be hunted down relentlessly for free AP by the tryhards just for trying to Quest or farm would make them drop ESO faster than any bug or performance issue ever could.
Been asked for a million times.
Dont think you are ever going to see it happen.
Might want to be careful what you ask for.
The fans of open world PVP will say they would support it if open world PVP be enabled in every other map.
We dont want that either.
The PvP community's idea of equality is hardly fair in practice however. A separate non-PvP Campaign for Cyrodiil still gives PvP their own space as usually. All it would do is take away all of their easy targets.
In comparison, enabling open world PvP in every zone, would effectively kill the game. PvE consists of a majority of the player base and forcing them all into a scenario where they'll be hunted down relentlessly for free AP by the tryhards just for trying to Quest or farm would make them drop ESO faster than any bug or performance issue ever could.
Cause having 95% of the game devoted to pve is equality and fair in practice? [snip]
[Edit for Baiting.]
Goregrinder wrote: »Been asked for a million times.
Dont think you are ever going to see it happen.
Might want to be careful what you ask for.
The fans of open world PVP will say they would support it if open world PVP be enabled in every other map.
We dont want that either.
The PvP community's idea of equality is hardly fair in practice however. A separate non-PvP Campaign for Cyrodiil still gives PvP their own space as usually. All it would do is take away all of their easy targets.
In comparison, enabling open world PvP in every zone, would effectively kill the game. PvE consists of a majority of the player base and forcing them all into a scenario where they'll be hunted down relentlessly for free AP by the tryhards just for trying to Quest or farm would make them drop ESO faster than any bug or performance issue ever could.
Cause having 95% of the game devoted to pve is equality and fair in practice? [snip]
[Edit for Baiting.]
I know, they're like " Oh hello PVPers...I see you guys have 5% of the game to yourselves...very nice....well guess what? We want that too...*YOINK* now we have 100% of the game to ourselves...thank you come again!"
I've been back and forth on the subject myself for a long time. My personal opinion is there should be a cyrodiil server that you enter in passive mode. As long as you don't attack a player, resource or keep etc. then you cannot be attacked. Do the same for large pve zonessuch as craglorn. Make half the zone pvp but you can still pve in it as long as you don't attack other players so if ppl choose to pvp there let them. Wont happen but I believe it would work.