Maintenance for the week of September 8:
• [IN PROGRESS] PC/Mac: EU megaserver for maintenance – September 9, 22:00 UTC (6:00PM EDT) - September 10, 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
• [IN PROGRESS] PC/Mac: EU megaserver for maintenance – September 9, 22:00 UTC (6:00PM EDT) - September 10, 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
Why CP 2.0 not CP 1.0
Lamagrokie
✭✭✭
Yesterday, i create discussion (https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/561526/most-fair-solution-of-scaling-from-cp-1-0-to-cp-2-0), which proposed fair (on my opinion) transition from OLD system of character progression to NEW one. And after reading comments i noticed, that some mistakenly compare CP 1.0 with CP 2.0. Here i want to explain why it's wrong point of view and put an end to this question.
1) CP 1.0 not equal CP 2.0, it's completely new independent system with its own specifications, therefore it's incorrectly to compare them and make comments like:
"... Be glad that they give you opportunity to earn CP after 810..." // We earned this experience on old CP system(which gave us this opportunity on purpose to further evolve on CP 1.0 ), it was another progression of our character, than it will be on CP 2.0
"... They changed the XP table on every other change to the cap...
...From 780 to 810...
...They've never retroactively given us what our CP would have been on the "new" scale...
...They are simply following the precedent that they have previously set..." // again it's not the same system's of progression it got only the same name CP, consequently we can't refer to previous precedent.
2) This system doesn't give us a new opportunity of evolving at the same way as it was at CP 1.0. They just reworked whole system of progression. Almost the same situation was when we're moved from Vet rank's to CP system, it was also reworking of player progression, with fair transition to new CP system.
Transfering from old system to new one absolutely similar to converting of money: if i want to get USD$ for EUR€ , there will be some exchange rate(1 EUR -> 1.2126 USD), because it's two different systems, as a crown buying process 1:500, but NOT 1:1.
And the comments like:
"...You only need 1100 CP to get to maximum efficiency for your role..." // it doesn't metter how much CP i need to do one thing or another, i (and almost all) just want to be fairly integrated into NEW system.
Community must unite to make it clear for ZOS, that it's unacceptable to transit all players to new progression system with rate 1:1.
1) CP 1.0 not equal CP 2.0, it's completely new independent system with its own specifications, therefore it's incorrectly to compare them and make comments like:
"... Be glad that they give you opportunity to earn CP after 810..." // We earned this experience on old CP system(which gave us this opportunity on purpose to further evolve on CP 1.0 ), it was another progression of our character, than it will be on CP 2.0
"... They changed the XP table on every other change to the cap...
...From 780 to 810...
...They've never retroactively given us what our CP would have been on the "new" scale...
...They are simply following the precedent that they have previously set..." // again it's not the same system's of progression it got only the same name CP, consequently we can't refer to previous precedent.
2) This system doesn't give us a new opportunity of evolving at the same way as it was at CP 1.0. They just reworked whole system of progression. Almost the same situation was when we're moved from Vet rank's to CP system, it was also reworking of player progression, with fair transition to new CP system.
Transfering from old system to new one absolutely similar to converting of money: if i want to get USD$ for EUR€ , there will be some exchange rate(1 EUR -> 1.2126 USD), because it's two different systems, as a crown buying process 1:500, but NOT 1:1.
And the comments like:
"...You only need 1100 CP to get to maximum efficiency for your role..." // it doesn't metter how much CP i need to do one thing or another, i (and almost all) just want to be fairly integrated into NEW system.
Conclusion:
Community must unite to make it clear for ZOS, that it's unacceptable to transit all players to new progression system with rate 1:1.
2
-
tmbrinks✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭cool, thanks for sharing. This couldn't have been done in the other thread?
I get when you have an idea and some people disagree, but you're talking like you are the sole authority on this, and that anybody else's opinion is wrong as a result.
The Unshattered - Tenacious Dreamer - Hurricane Herald - Godslayer - Dawnbringer - Gryphon Heart - Tick Tock Tormenter - Immortal Redeemer - Dro-m'Athra DestroyerThe Unchained - Moth Trusted - The Just - Oathsworn - Bedlam's Disciple - Temporal Tempest - Curator's Champion - Fist of Tava - Invader's Bane - Land, Air, and Sea Supremacy - Zero Regrets - Battlespire's Best - Bastion Breaker - Ardent Bibliophile - Subterranean Smasher - Bane of Thorns - True Genius - In Defiance of Death - No Rest for the Wicked - Nature's Wrath - Undying Endurance - Relentless Raider - Depths Defier - Apex Predator - Pure Lunacy - Mountain God - Leave No Bone Unbroken - CoS/RoM/BF/FH Challenger69,420 achievement points0 -
ZOS_ConnorGmodGreetings all,
After review this thread has been closed as being a functional duplicate of another thread. If you wish to continue the discussion of this topic you may do so on the other thread located here.0
This discussion has been closed.