BXR_Lonestar wrote: »I voted no. My main healer is a nord templar and I've healed a crap-ton of difficult content on him, including solo trials. Race doesn't matter as much for healers and even a non-meta race like the nord has a lot to offer for the healer role. Extra defense and health makes him more survivable right out of the box, and extra ultimate generation means more warhorns. There's no build in magika sustain, but that can be compensated for with smart play.
Yes, there are races that have racial passives that add ZERO benefit to the healer role (Woodelf and orc, unless you are a stam-healer), but for most other races, the racials can add at least a little something to the healer toolkit that can be beneficial.
My Bosmer Templar healer says hi. :-)
VaranisArano wrote: »There's a comic for this situation: "Respect your healers" by Isriana
https://www.deviantart.com/isriana/art/TESO-Respect-Your-Healers-696152788
Girl_Number8 wrote: »No that would be stupid. I would refuse a healer if they had a bow.
Khajiit actually make pretty decent healers when build right (Critical Healing + Maximum Magicka bonus). I would even say that they can be better than Argonians for that role. Definitely not best, but viable.VaranisArano wrote: »There's a comic for this situation: "Respect your healers" by Isriana
https://www.deviantart.com/isriana/art/TESO-Respect-Your-Healers-696152788
VaranisArano wrote: »Girl_Number8 wrote: »No that would be stupid. I would refuse a healer if they had a bow.