NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Potato class.
EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Potato class.
LOL
I am trying to figure out how the choice of class has anything to do with how toxic a player is. I guess the poll is merely measuring what experience with a toxic player someone has had but more likely just the class they struggle with most if they PvP.EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
This demonstrates my second suggestion at what is driving the poll. It is merely a class they are challenged with and has nothing to do with toxicity.
BTW, start using a counter to cloak. I can attest they work well once one learns how to use them properly. I enjoy hunting gankers and players I see using cloak.
EdmondDontes wrote: »NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Potato class.
LOL
I am trying to figure out how the choice of class has anything to do with how toxic a player is. I guess the poll is merely measuring what experience with a toxic player someone has had but more likely just the class they struggle with most if they PvP.EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
This demonstrates my second suggestion at what is driving the poll. It is merely a class they are challenged with and has nothing to do with toxicity.
BTW, start using a counter to cloak. I can attest they work well once one learns how to use them properly. I enjoy hunting gankers and players I see using cloak.
No. Nightblade play style and ability to cloak guarantees the class to attract toxic players to it. The argument that people should use counters doesn't work because a cloakblade can just continue using that skill continuously while the counters are time limited.
DTStormfox wrote: »My experience with most (not all) nightblades I encounter goes something like this:
- I kill them
- They whisper: 1v1 me
- I reply: no.
- They reply: you are a noob.
- I reply: Who's dead?
- They reply: go f**k yourself.
- I place them on the ignore list.
EdmondDontes wrote: »NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Potato class.
LOL
I am trying to figure out how the choice of class has anything to do with how toxic a player is. I guess the poll is merely measuring what experience with a toxic player someone has had but more likely just the class they struggle with most if they PvP.EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
This demonstrates my second suggestion at what is driving the poll. It is merely a class they are challenged with and has nothing to do with toxicity.
BTW, start using a counter to cloak. I can attest they work well once one learns how to use them properly. I enjoy hunting gankers and players I see using cloak.
No. Nightblade play style and ability to cloak guarantees the class to attract toxic players to it. The argument that people should use counters doesn't work because a cloakblade can just continue using that skill continuously while the counters are time limited.
EdmondDontes wrote: »NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Potato class.
LOL
I am trying to figure out how the choice of class has anything to do with how toxic a player is. I guess the poll is merely measuring what experience with a toxic player someone has had but more likely just the class they struggle with most if they PvP.EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
This demonstrates my second suggestion at what is driving the poll. It is merely a class they are challenged with and has nothing to do with toxicity.
BTW, start using a counter to cloak. I can attest they work well once one learns how to use them properly. I enjoy hunting gankers and players I see using cloak.
No. Nightblade play style and ability to cloak guarantees the class to attract toxic players to it. The argument that people should use counters doesn't work because a cloakblade can just continue using that skill continuously while the counters are time limited.
Oh, no, the counters do work and they do work well. When I run solo I am generally going after the gankers and successfully use them. Just like anything else it takes time to figure out how to use them well.
Further, by your same logic sorcs with streak would attract a toxic player. I cannot tell you how many times I have trolled players streaking just out of range to have them chase me. I wear them down so they make dumb mistakes and kill them. It is fun.
DKs with leap, chains, and roots lead to some fun gameplay as well some would consider toxic. Ofc, when they could reflect almost every range skill in the game some considered them the most toxic.
I could continue but I think we both have made my point that this really has to do with the class a player has the most challenge with which creates a perception of the player behind the mask.
EdmondDontes wrote: »EdmondDontes wrote: »NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Potato class.
LOL
I am trying to figure out how the choice of class has anything to do with how toxic a player is. I guess the poll is merely measuring what experience with a toxic player someone has had but more likely just the class they struggle with most if they PvP.EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
This demonstrates my second suggestion at what is driving the poll. It is merely a class they are challenged with and has nothing to do with toxicity.
BTW, start using a counter to cloak. I can attest they work well once one learns how to use them properly. I enjoy hunting gankers and players I see using cloak.
No. Nightblade play style and ability to cloak guarantees the class to attract toxic players to it. The argument that people should use counters doesn't work because a cloakblade can just continue using that skill continuously while the counters are time limited.
Oh, no, the counters do work and they do work well. When I run solo I am generally going after the gankers and successfully use them. Just like anything else it takes time to figure out how to use them well.
Further, by your same logic sorcs with streak would attract a toxic player. I cannot tell you how many times I have trolled players streaking just out of range to have them chase me. I wear them down so they make dumb mistakes and kill them. It is fun.
DKs with leap, chains, and roots lead to some fun gameplay as well some would consider toxic. Ofc, when they could reflect almost every range skill in the game some considered them the most toxic.
I could continue but I think we both have made my point that this really has to do with the class a player has the most challenge with which creates a perception of the player behind the mask.
Sure, the counters to cloak do work fairly well, but again, they are time limited and the ability to cloak is not. So the cloakblade just waits a few seconds and reengages the fight from stealth after the counter timer has expired. Furthermore, the cloak ability does, in fact, seem more attractive to a person who is more toxic for obvious reasons. Cloakblades do tend to attract players that tend toward more toxicity in real life.
Nightblades are hated because they’re generally played by skilled players and skilled players are disliked on this game. Sorcs annoy me because that stupid flappy bird gets in the way all the time and they always streak away when they’re low.
Nightblades are hated because they’re generally played by skilled players and skilled players are disliked on this game. Sorcs annoy me because that stupid flappy bird gets in the way all the time and they always streak away when they’re low.
EdmondDontes wrote: »EdmondDontes wrote: »NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Potato class.
LOL
I am trying to figure out how the choice of class has anything to do with how toxic a player is. I guess the poll is merely measuring what experience with a toxic player someone has had but more likely just the class they struggle with most if they PvP.EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
This demonstrates my second suggestion at what is driving the poll. It is merely a class they are challenged with and has nothing to do with toxicity.
BTW, start using a counter to cloak. I can attest they work well once one learns how to use them properly. I enjoy hunting gankers and players I see using cloak.
No. Nightblade play style and ability to cloak guarantees the class to attract toxic players to it. The argument that people should use counters doesn't work because a cloakblade can just continue using that skill continuously while the counters are time limited.
Oh, no, the counters do work and they do work well. When I run solo I am generally going after the gankers and successfully use them. Just like anything else it takes time to figure out how to use them well.
Further, by your same logic sorcs with streak would attract a toxic player. I cannot tell you how many times I have trolled players streaking just out of range to have them chase me. I wear them down so they make dumb mistakes and kill them. It is fun.
DKs with leap, chains, and roots lead to some fun gameplay as well some would consider toxic. Ofc, when they could reflect almost every range skill in the game some considered them the most toxic.
I could continue but I think we both have made my point that this really has to do with the class a player has the most challenge with which creates a perception of the player behind the mask.
Sure, the counters to cloak do work fairly well, but again, they are time limited and the ability to cloak is not. So the cloakblade just waits a few seconds and reengages the fight from stealth after the counter timer has expired. Furthermore, the cloak ability does, in fact, seem more attractive to a person who is more toxic for obvious reasons. Cloakblades do tend to attract players that tend toward more toxicity in real life.
phileunderx2 wrote: »Sorc because their pets are annoying and streak is stupid.
EdmondDontes wrote: »Cloakblade is without contest the most toxic and the abilities available to them make them even more toxic and unbalanced.
The day ZOS introduced cloakblade was the day they gave up on class balancing.
I've been thinking for a while, there might be a (weak) correlation between personality characteristics and chosen class. I presume that some classes may have a distinct feel and playstyle which is more compatible with certain personalities. Just to take the extreme cases, e.g. a sneaky killer or a malevolent healer.
Of course player is the most important factor though.
Nightblades are hated because they’re generally played by skilled players and skilled players are disliked on this game. Sorcs annoy me because that stupid flappy bird gets in the way all the time and they always streak away when they’re low.
No one hates a skilled nightblade. People hate Lethal Arrow spammers and proc set users. Once I dueled a stamblade in IC, and I was on my magsorc (no pet). We danced around for a couple of minutes and he eventually got me, in melee range after a good brawl. This is how skilled NBs play. We then had a chat about our fight and the guy was very friendly.
Also "they always streak away when they’re low". Do you expect sorcs to just stand there and die?
Nightblades are hated because they’re generally played by skilled players and skilled players are disliked on this game. Sorcs annoy me because that stupid flappy bird gets in the way all the time and they always streak away when they’re low.
No one hates a skilled nightblade. People hate Lethal Arrow spammers and proc set users. Once I dueled a stamblade in IC, and I was on my magsorc (no pet). We danced around for a couple of minutes and he eventually got me, in melee range after a good brawl. This is how skilled NBs play. We then had a chat about our fight and the guy was very friendly.
Also "they always streak away when they’re low". Do you expect sorcs to just stand there and die?
I mean Snipe spammers are universally hated but I can’t take people seriously who complain about cloak when every decent player either counters or works around cloak it’s laughable to even suggest NB is toxic because of cloak when in reality most of these players will die anyway to a good NB player, cloak or no cloak and that’s not because of class it’s just because of knowledge of the game. Also I didn’t say a sorc should stand there and die but we’ve all encountered a sorc who has streaked away when they know they’re beaten let’s be honest.
DTStormfox wrote: »My experience with most (not all) nightblades I encounter goes something like this:
- I kill them
- They whisper: 1v1 me
- I reply: no.
- They reply: you are a noob.
- I reply: Who's dead?
- They reply: go f**k yourself.
- I place them on the ignore list.