universal_wrath wrote: »Commandment wrote: »In BGs stamina dominated every patch and even this one is dominating.
Why? Break free cost over 5k stamina in no-CP and stamina builds have way higher burst combos. Most magicka builds run from 10k to 16k stamina. In the recent period you pretty much get CC'ed off cooldown, so at you the conclusions.
There are some exceptions like magsorcs (especially fury spammers) will just get tons of kills from range and the more your team is good the more they are effective.
But overall stamcro stamplar stamden and stamdk are the kings of BGs.
If you play against 2 decent stamdks which coordinate and time their leaps you are pretty much facerolled.
Stamcros and stamdens can kite 2 or 3 people and don't die while bursting like crazy, stamplars provides off heals and they have the easiest combo burst in the game to pull off.
If you have a problem with shields and magsorcs use shield breaker set from imperial city or guild stores, I don't know which class do you play so i cannot give you a more specific advice.
So your explanation is you need 2 stam DK's not 1 who are well coordinated, with ulti up, to kill a single sorc? Okay... Very compelling argument.
When you reach higher MMR you see more, and more staffs.
My pvp gear is already good. And when I say gear, I mean geared, all yellows. Don't need any lessons, I was having my fun in low MMR with stam, but you have to go with the current meta, and currently Magicka is where it's at in BG's
It is very weird that you speak of high MMR and mag sorc, I almost never saw either mag or stam sorcs in high MMR pre-harrowstorm. Stam sorc lacked survivability and dmg which is why they were gone and mag sorc combo was very predictable they almost never kill anyone especialy if playing against healing bots. I only remmember seeing 1 sorc who occassionaly apoear in BGs, he was a gank stealth sorc which he did have kills only 4-5 and dies twic as much. I don't know how high the mmr now you talking about so I can't know for sure as I have never seen your name before, I have seen @Iskiab or someone with similar name and people like duskPK, Mayorz, or Xziii many times fought with and against them. Maybe your in game user is just different the yours in forum like me, or maybe you play NA more than EU.
Joinovikova wrote: »Commandment wrote: »Change my mind
Ever since the implementation of solo que only in BG's everyone and there mother's are rerolling staff's, now everyone rolls the sweaty builds Note this is directed to BG battles.
Stamina User: If your a warden, don't read this, you were blessed by the ESO God's to be a immortal tank with damage.
Pros:
1. You look cool
2. In the real world, you can do massive damage in pve.
Cons:
1. You're a stamina user.
2. You have to go close range most of the time, and if not, arrows are only good against other stamina charaters
3. You only have a tick heal, unless your a warden, in matter of fact if your a warden your probably the only viable stamina user.
4. You melt like butter to anyone with a staff.
5. You rdamage mitigation abilities dodge/break free/block uses up your attack resources.
6. You are using foam swords and branches when you fight against a magicka user, except when you fight other stamina characters.
Magicka User
Pros:
3. MASSIVE DAMAGE, PEW PEW PEW I HAVE NO CONSEQUENCES FOR BEING FAR RANGED!!
4. MASSIVE SHIELDS YOU CAN WEAVE ALL THE TIME INTO YOUR COMBO'S, Laughing at stamina users as they hit you with there foam swords and shoot you with twigs
5. If your a sorc you have HIGH MOBILITY
6. Can knock back those pesky stamina users! and blast them to hell with a few shots
7. Your light attacks do a lot of damage!
8. You have ALL the stamina in the world to break free and dodge, since you don't really use it for fighting. So you not only have massive heals and shields, you can dodge way more freely
9. Class variations will be your cherry on top, specifically if your a sorcerrard or templard
Con's:
1. There are other magicka users
2. Stamina Users will grief and become magicka users to spite the game design.
Suggestion for a way to change this. Make a set that either breaks shields fast, or ignore shields that only works for stamina abilties so magicka users can't abuse it. Or add a stamina abilities that completely negates shields.
... Stamina set ups are much far stronger than magica in one on one or small scale like BG.. try to also some mag char first..... big L2P issue... Every stam class is now immortal tank with masive burst.. not only warden..
Joinovikova wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »In bgs mag has always had a strong group presence with stam having high kill potential. If you get into a bg with a good amount of mag players that work well together and are in sync then they’ll easily outplay stam. Although in the more chaotic matches stam has the advantage.
I think Zerg has it right.
My stam tank DK has killed by 3 high cooperating mag players. and I am not kill them with single leap.. hmm magica is total op need to be nerfed.. the main content o this QQ sesion anyone who play mag and stam.. seee ..
3. MASSIVE DAMAGE, PEW PEW PEW I HAVE NO CONSEQUENCES FOR BEING FAR RANGED!!Commandment wrote: »Change my mind
Ever since the implementation of solo que only in BG's everyone and there mother's are rerolling staff's, now everyone rolls the sweaty builds Note this is directed to BG battles.
Stamina User: If your a warden, don't read this, you were blessed by the ESO God's to be a immortal tank with damage.
Pros:
1. You look cool
2. In the real world, you can do massive damage in pve.
Cons:
1. You're a stamina user.
2. You have to go close range most of the time, and if not, arrows are only good against other stamina charaters
3. You only have a tick heal, unless your a warden, in matter of fact if your a warden your probably the only viable stamina user.
4. You melt like butter to anyone with a staff.
5. You rdamage mitigation abilities dodge/break free/block uses up your attack resources.
6. You are using foam swords and branches when you fight against a magicka user, except when you fight other stamina characters.
Magicka User
Pros:
3. MASSIVE DAMAGE, PEW PEW PEW I HAVE NO CONSEQUENCES FOR BEING FAR RANGED!!
4. MASSIVE SHIELDS YOU CAN WEAVE ALL THE TIME INTO YOUR COMBO'S, Laughing at stamina users as they hit you with there foam swords and shoot you with twigs
5. If your a sorc you have HIGH MOBILITY
6. Can knock back those pesky stamina users! and blast them to hell with a few shots
7. Your light attacks do a lot of damage!
8. You have ALL the stamina in the world to break free and dodge, since you don't really use it for fighting. So you not only have massive heals and shields, you can dodge way more freely
9. Class variations will be your cherry on top, specifically if your a sorcerrard or templard
Con's:
1. There are other magicka users
2. Stamina Users will grief and become magicka users to spite the game design.
Suggestion for a way to change this. Make a set that either breaks shields fast, or ignore shields that only works for stamina abilties so magicka users can't abuse it. Or add a stamina abilities that completely negates shields.
My stam tank DK has killed by 3 high cooperating mag players. and I am not kill them with single leap.. hmm magica is total op need to be nerfed.. the main content o this QQ session anyone who play mag and stam.. seee ..
3. MASSIVE DAMAGE, PEW PEW PEW I HAVE NO CONSEQUENCES FOR BEING FAR RANGED!!
coopare dmg potential of stam (which is masive higher than mag) and mag builds.. (ranged? on f.e. mag Dk?)
Sheild also were overnerfed... high cost low protection.. and reqiuire to use light armor due to high cost.. so low resistance
"Can knock back those pesky stamina users! and blast them to hell with a few shots" aonly case of stamina set ups.. no posible on mag..
" Your light attacks do a lot of damage! " stamina has much stronger LA than magica.. (also in case when u use bows....)
"You have ALL the stamina in the world to break free and dodge, since you don't really use it for fighting. So you not only have massive heals and shields, you can dodge way more freely" but mag class cannot have decent stam regen, becuase they need to invest to mag regen, and it much more easieer to drain mag builds from stam then stam build...
@Iskiab just stop.
High MMR last patch was nothing but mag sorcs, magcros, magplars, and magdens, with a sprinkling of Stam toons queueing in groups.
Every time I hear you mention high MMR I cringe. I’m sure you’re a nice guy but you really have no idea what you’re talking about. Humble yourself.
Magcro? What player, there aren’t a lot of magcros in BGs period.
High MMR players that I saw a lot and assume off the top of my head are: Bersberg, Mystikkal, MavPK, Akean, MavPK, Haki, Sunspots (can’t remember his name). A high MMR game would be when they’re all in the same BG.
I think because we play at different times you assume you’re higher than me, but if it’s based on games played I’m not even sure. A high MMR game to me is when it’s not lopsided and it’s all people who play BGs a lot.
LittlePinkDot wrote: »Bring back CP to BGs
Commandment wrote: »universal_wrath wrote: »Commandment wrote: »In BGs stamina dominated every patch and even this one is dominating.
Why? Break free cost over 5k stamina in no-CP and stamina builds have way higher burst combos. Most magicka builds run from 10k to 16k stamina. In the recent period you pretty much get CC'ed off cooldown, so at you the conclusions.
There are some exceptions like magsorcs (especially fury spammers) will just get tons of kills from range and the more your team is good the more they are effective.
But overall stamcro stamplar stamden and stamdk are the kings of BGs.
If you play against 2 decent stamdks which coordinate and time their leaps you are pretty much facerolled.
Stamcros and stamdens can kite 2 or 3 people and don't die while bursting like crazy, stamplars provides off heals and they have the easiest combo burst in the game to pull off.
If you have a problem with shields and magsorcs use shield breaker set from imperial city or guild stores, I don't know which class do you play so i cannot give you a more specific advice.
So your explanation is you need 2 stam DK's not 1 who are well coordinated, with ulti up, to kill a single sorc? Okay... Very compelling argument.
When you reach higher MMR you see more, and more staffs.
My pvp gear is already good. And when I say gear, I mean geared, all yellows. Don't need any lessons, I was having my fun in low MMR with stam, but you have to go with the current meta, and currently Magicka is where it's at in BG's
It is very weird that you speak of high MMR and mag sorc, I almost never saw either mag or stam sorcs in high MMR pre-harrowstorm. Stam sorc lacked survivability and dmg which is why they were gone and mag sorc combo was very predictable they almost never kill anyone especialy if playing against healing bots. I only remmember seeing 1 sorc who occassionaly apoear in BGs, he was a gank stealth sorc which he did have kills only 4-5 and dies twic as much. I don't know how high the mmr now you talking about so I can't know for sure as I have never seen your name before, I have seen @Iskiab or someone with similar name and people like duskPK, Mayorz, or Xziii many times fought with and against them. Maybe your in game user is just different the yours in forum like me, or maybe you play NA more than EU.
Moment you said prehorrowstorm I stopped reading. Sorry we are talking about post horrowstorm. Get out of the past my dude. That was the time where people can que up with there friends and make neat battleground builds. THANK GOODNESS ESO made this game a solo player game in BG's now people will run the best build to hope they don't get stomped.
So this is more like a public announcement, run magicka, tired of seeing stamina users that go negative deaths and no kills.
Step 1: Read what your abilities do
Step 2: practice
Step 3: learn how to play
Step 4: post on the forums
Please sticky.
Commandment wrote: »
Its interesting as people kind of just jump on the stam>magicka thing based on if you look at 1v1 raw kill potential. With the MMR reset and solo only queue; I'm sure there's a lot of selfish versions of the heals and not a lot of echoing vigor. I mean how do you go in with that.when you dont know who you'll get and they cant be trusted to reciprocate
I’ve noticed that some stam are running echoing now in BGs. It’s balanced with a 6 target cap in mind, but they’ll still do about 200k healing per BG and it’s MUCH appreciated.
I don’t know the technical aspect of it and how they run it or or why, maybe to extend the offensive window like I use radiating since it lasts 10 seconds? I use radiating like a buff and imagine they’re doing the same with echoing. The longer duration definitely makes it easier to brawl, who wants to switch to their back bar every 4 seconds to heal.
Commandment wrote: »3. MASSIVE DAMAGE, PEW PEW PEW I HAVE NO CONSEQUENCES FOR BEING FAR RANGED!!
Commandment wrote: »MASSIVE SHIELDS YOU CAN WEAVE ALL THE TIME INTO YOUR COMBO'S,
Commandment wrote: »If your a sorc you have HIGH MOBILITY
Commandment wrote: »Can knock back those pesky stamina users! and blast them to hell with a few shots
Commandment wrote: »You have ALL the stamina in the world to break free and dodge, since you don't really use it for fighting. So you not only have massive heals and shields, you can dodge way more freely
Commandment wrote: »Class variations will be your cherry on top, specifically if your a sorcerrard or templard
Cirantille wrote: »There was another person claimin the otherwise that stam > magicka
I think they are quite equal, just plays and built differently
Cirantille wrote: »There was another person claimin the otherwise that stam > magicka
I think they are quite equal, just plays and built differently
That was Thogard who made that thread right before the patch, apparently he changed his mind and now he thinks mag > stam.
Cirantille wrote: »There was another person claimin the otherwise that stam > magicka
I think they are quite equal, just plays and built differently
That was Thogard who made that thread right before the patch, apparently he changed his mind and now he thinks mag > stam.
The last time Thogard made a thread was back in september. He's not an idiot, he knows mag has been better than stam for group play since they changed the healing like 3 patches ago. You love giving your opinion about everything, but the fact of the matter is you don't know what you're talking about more often than not. Stop posting and let more knowledgeable players answer the questions.
Commandment wrote: »[...]
Magicka User
Pros:
3. MASSIVE DAMAGE, PEW PEW PEW I HAVE NO CONSEQUENCES FOR BEING FAR RANGED!!
4. MASSIVE SHIELDS YOU CAN WEAVE ALL THE TIME INTO YOUR COMBO'S, Laughing at stamina users as they hit you with there foam swords and shoot you with twigs [...]
@Commandment So lets see, you joined about a month ago and have already made multiple silly posts. This one also is just literally filled with misinformation, false assumptions and l2p issues. Maybe get a firm grasp on the game first before making absolute statements as you do in the OP. And make sure to l2p on both mag and stam, as you will see the lunacy in your post.
I understand the confusion from how I worded it, but I was just pointing at his posting history so far and that he's not doing a great first impression on the forums judging from that. His posts indicate a severe lack of l2p, and misunderstanding of basic game mechanics. Its hard to take this thread seriously as such.universal_wrath wrote: »@Commandment So lets see, you joined about a month ago and have already made multiple silly posts. This one also is just literally filled with misinformation, false assumptions and l2p issues. Maybe get a firm grasp on the game first before making absolute statements as you do in the OP. And make sure to l2p on both mag and stam, as you will see the lunacy in your post.
While I disagree with what @Commandment said, your point of discussion is completely invalid imo. Just because someone create a forum account yesterday, does not mean they just started playing yesterday. I played the game since launch and I only knew that the forum exist 2 years ago or so when my friend interduced me to it. Lots of people are like me, either didn't know about the forums or didn't feel the need to voice their opinions before. Accounting someones credibilty through their forum account creation date is unvalid.
You get a kick out of people who think black and white, yet you feel you can decide what are good/bad answers, as if thats not black and white... There is a fine line between false or correct and opinion/theory.Cirantille wrote: »There was another person claimin the otherwise that stam > magicka
I think they are quite equal, just plays and built differently
That was Thogard who made that thread right before the patch, apparently he changed his mind and now he thinks mag > stam.
The last time Thogard made a thread was back in september. He's not an idiot, he knows mag has been better than stam for group play since they changed the healing like 3 patches ago. You love giving your opinion about everything, but the fact of the matter is you don't know what you're talking about more often than not. Stop posting and let more knowledgeable players answer the questions.
I always get a kick out of people who think so black and white. I'll stop answering when people stop giving bad answers.
For some reason even when I'm going winning 80%+ of my BGs there are always people telling me I'm wrong who're on the losing end. Maybe it's time to look in the mirror.
@Commandment So lets see, you joined about a month ago and have already made multiple silly posts. This one also is just literally filled with misinformation, false assumptions and l2p issues. Maybe get a firm grasp on the game first before making absolute statements as you do in the OP. And make sure to l2p on both mag and stam, as you will see the lunacy in your post.
You get a kick out of people who think black and white, yet you feel you can decide what are good/bad answers, as if thats not black and white... There is a fine line between false or correct and opinion/theory.Cirantille wrote: »There was another person claimin the otherwise that stam > magicka
I think they are quite equal, just plays and built differently
That was Thogard who made that thread right before the patch, apparently he changed his mind and now he thinks mag > stam.
The last time Thogard made a thread was back in september. He's not an idiot, he knows mag has been better than stam for group play since they changed the healing like 3 patches ago. You love giving your opinion about everything, but the fact of the matter is you don't know what you're talking about more often than not. Stop posting and let more knowledgeable players answer the questions.
I always get a kick out of people who think so black and white. I'll stop answering when people stop giving bad answers.
For some reason even when I'm going winning 80%+ of my BGs there are always people telling me I'm wrong who're on the losing end. Maybe it's time to look in the mirror.
I see you all the time on the forums sharing theories as facts and making predictions about upcoming patches, and basing them on anecdotal evidence or solely your own experience: "class X isn't good because I don't see a lot of them in BGs". Or: "stamblade isn't good solo open world, because I never saw one do well". Sometimes you even dismiss an entire class based on a single ability which YOU think is trash. Speaking of black and white again...
Unless you can back it up with actual facts and not anecdotal evidence or personal experience, it is your opinion/pov and it might just be you who ends up being wrong. Your post applies 100% to yourself, but it's funny how you think you are above that somehow.
Emma_Overload wrote: »Since when do Magicka users have "MASSIVE DAMAGE"?
Not going into a debate about whether or not you were wrong or right. Thats not the point. The point here is, you post things as fact which aren't facts and then call others who don't agree with your views as "people who don't adapt", thereby already labeling your opinion as the standard that others are judged by. Just show a bit more nuance in your posts and people might actually take them seriously. I am not bashing or w/e, but your tone and the way you assume yourself as the authority on a number of subjects just reeks of narcissism. Anyway, made my point. I'll stop derailing this thread now.You get a kick out of people who think black and white, yet you feel you can decide what are good/bad answers, as if thats not black and white... There is a fine line between false or correct and opinion/theory.Cirantille wrote: »There was another person claimin the otherwise that stam > magicka
I think they are quite equal, just plays and built differently
That was Thogard who made that thread right before the patch, apparently he changed his mind and now he thinks mag > stam.
The last time Thogard made a thread was back in september. He's not an idiot, he knows mag has been better than stam for group play since they changed the healing like 3 patches ago. You love giving your opinion about everything, but the fact of the matter is you don't know what you're talking about more often than not. Stop posting and let more knowledgeable players answer the questions.
I always get a kick out of people who think so black and white. I'll stop answering when people stop giving bad answers.
For some reason even when I'm going winning 80%+ of my BGs there are always people telling me I'm wrong who're on the losing end. Maybe it's time to look in the mirror.
I see you all the time on the forums sharing theories as facts and making predictions about upcoming patches, and basing them on anecdotal evidence or solely your own experience: "class X isn't good because I don't see a lot of them in BGs". Or: "stamblade isn't good solo open world, because I never saw one do well". Sometimes you even dismiss an entire class based on a single ability which YOU think is trash. Speaking of black and white again...
Unless you can back it up with actual facts and not anecdotal evidence or personal experience, it is your opinion/pov and it might just be you who ends up being wrong. Your post applies 100% to yourself, but it's funny how you think you are above that somehow.
You say that like I’ve been wrong. ‘My theories’ about upcoming patches have usually been right.
Called magplar being strong when people said they were weak, called magblade being weak, called stamblade being weak, called MagWarden being good.
A LOT of people on the forums don’t play enough and have outdated opinions. They hold those opinions and keep spouting them long after the game has changed. As someone who is still playing, of course I’m going to disagree with people who’s opinion is outdated. Add in all the try hards who just parrot others instead of playing/trying different things and it’s hard not to disagree with most of what’s written.
Already clarified what I meant in a later post. But tbh, I have my doubts that you actually play magicka on a regular basis if you post things like "On mag you have stam for days to break free and dodge, because you don't need it for damage". Every mag player that isn't talking out of his ass will admit that stam management is actually a very important factor in how to play a mag build. Especially in no CP it can be a challenge and especially when solo. Yes, you don't need stam for damage, but your pool will also be a lot smaller than on a stamina builds, plus lower recoveries/cost reduction. That point alone shows you didnt really think about what you were posting.Commandment wrote: »@Commandment So lets see, you joined about a month ago and have already made multiple silly posts. This one also is just literally filled with misinformation, false assumptions and l2p issues. Maybe get a firm grasp on the game first before making absolute statements as you do in the OP. And make sure to l2p on both mag and stam, as you will see the lunacy in your post.
You do realize that forums doesnt account for how long you play right? Based on your stupidity, I can assume you have no valid opinion. If thats how your reasoning goes, then be my guest.
If you read anything, I said I play magicka, and I'm rolling on people, just like I'de roll on you.
So instead of saying L2P, how about you L2R if you dont understand that R, it means read. Oh and yes OBVIOUSLY I exaggerated the potential of magicka, ITS HUMOR!!!!! DERRRRRRPPPPPP GERRRR HERRRRRRRPPPPP... I guess snow flakes don't see that.