Salix_alba wrote: »https://imgur.com/a/rpOJIom
lets see if that works for some reason i can post pics in other threads. ok this is an example of putting a cuirass over a robe kind of outfit in this case its just a light daedric legs but you prob get the point

January1171 wrote: »I would really love the ability to choose between the male/female versions when there are gendered titles/costumes/etc.
For example, the male and female versions are drastically different. I love the male version, but hate the female version. I would love to be able to choose which of the costumes my character can wear, but because my character is female I'm stuck with the option I very much dislike.
More ability to choose would be great!
YaYaPineapple wrote: »The baker costume is an especially good example of this. The male version looks great. The female version looks like a nun wearing an apron. Its terrible
I doubt anyone is really asking for topless female characters.
January1171 wrote: »I would really love the ability to choose between the male/female versions when there are gendered titles/costumes/etc.
For example, the male and female versions are drastically different. I love the male version, but hate the female version. I would love to be able to choose which of the costumes my character can wear, but because my character is female I'm stuck with the option I very much dislike.
More ability to choose would be great!
No offense but armor is meant for protection, not to look good. What use is a chainmail bikini when it exposes so many weak points (like the belly area for example) to be instantly killed by a sword.

ESO is waaay better than other MMO’s, including GW2, in that regard! Want to look like a badass assassin? Too bad, if you’re female you’re stuck with leather lingerie!Actually, I can’t even think of any costumes in ESO that differ based on gender unless what you’re wanting is to have your female characters completely topless.
Salix_alba wrote: »uuum are you asking for slootier female clothing? not gonna lie while that might not bother me one bit hint, hint but I can see where it would um I dont know alienate like 51% of the population and I actually have to admit the armor designs for most of the female versions are kind of respectable considering how they appear in other games compared to eso even if cleavage in an armor chest piece would be dangerous irl watch a "shadiversity vid" for what i mean or "epic npc man" for the old female armor in games gags.
Or are you being realistic and saying that the male version without the form fitting shape that some armors female version have should be an option for female toons? Well problem is they have 2 different skeletons and the last time they mistakenly applied the male pattern on a female piece of armor it was an utter disaster I think it was the dc armor cuirass i could be wrong about the specific one I just remember there was one there would have to be a redesign on all female armor options for all existing armors and I don't see that happening.
I do wish we could get the robe legs as seperate styles from the robes chest styles meaning the dress portion over the legs separate for the exisitng styles so we could put cuirass chests over all the styles robes for the battle mage look there are only 4-5 stlyes with dresses for legs out of all styles outside of robes
January1171 wrote: »Females also can't use male hairstyles and males can't use female hairstyles. I don't think anyone could argue that would be breaking tos
Actually you can, not while creating character, but trough outfit system/hairstyles.
TheRealPotoroo wrote: »January1171 wrote: »I would really love the ability to choose between the male/female versions when there are gendered titles/costumes/etc.
For example, the male and female versions are drastically different. I love the male version, but hate the female version. I would love to be able to choose which of the costumes my character can wear, but because my character is female I'm stuck with the option I very much dislike.
More ability to choose would be great!
No offense but armor is meant for protection, not to look good. What use is a chainmail bikini when it exposes so many weak points (like the belly area for example) to be instantly killed by a sword.
Nerd fact: medieval breastplates were effectively unisex anyway. It's not always easy to see but combat breastplates are never flat, they always bulge out a little over the chest and stomach. This rounded shape made them more resistant to frontal thrusts as well as helping to deflect blows. Quilted padding was typically worn under the breastplate and this would have been sufficiently thick across the chest to fill up the gap. But that gap between the chest and the breastplate also meant most women could conceivably wear that type of armour with little or no modification.
No offense but armor is meant for protection, not to look good. What use is a chainmail bikini when it exposes so many weak points (like the belly area for example) to be instantly killed by a sword.
YaYaPineapple wrote: »I doubt anyone is really asking for topless female characters.