The thought off burping on people until they die makes me want to go back to magdk lol. But if I can attain good dps without resorting to this joke meta I guess I will be okay.
Pvp is another story. Gonna be a try hard again.
MentalxHammer wrote: »Like there are multiple new options to use as a spammable... carve is going to be inline with most other spammables but will apply aoe bleeds, flurry has viable damage now.
exactly. and all those spammables are not DK-specific.
so why does anyone wants to be a stamDK?no, MELEE class got buffed, StamDK is still left alone in the corner of the room like a special needs child.Your stamDK did get buffed you're just looking in the wrong places.MentalxHammer wrote: »Wait why do you guys think stam DK is in a bad spot??? This class is literally king for pvp right now...
i don't think we're the kings of PvP, but honestly, we just want a label a bit better than "the tanky poison class who uses wep skill"Time to either puke myself out while slotting a skill that's used for passive, or join the merry MagDK bandwagon?and using a skill only for its passive, which is completely against the intended usage.
In other words, we're adapting to a broken class with a broken set of skills.
I both laugh and cry with the stam DK community. - stamina sorcerer main for years
*waves to the special needs child at the other corner of the room*
4- No comments. Though I agree stamsorc needs a lot of love, this is not the place to ask for it
It makes no senseTime to either puke myself out while slotting a skill that's used for passive, or join the merry MagDK bandwagon?and using a skill only for its passive, which is completely against the intended usage.
In other words, we're adapting to a broken class with a broken set of skills.
I both laugh and cry with the stam DK community. - stamina sorcerer main for years
what about going to the stamsorc post to say that?
We all want classes to be fixed, that kind of opinion doesn't help.
The change is odd, because some years ago ZoS got rid of toggles (most of them). Even bad-but-not-so-bad Inferno was reworked into a more active skill. Now the solution to make stamDK "competitive" again is a toogle.
edit: quote
My mom says I'm special. *Burps noxious fumes.*
Its mdk time people
MentalxHammer wrote: »Like there are multiple new options to use as a spammable... carve is going to be inline with most other spammables but will apply aoe bleeds, flurry has viable damage now. Your stamDK did get buffed you're just looking in the wrong places.
GeorgeBlack wrote: »For every 20 lengthy Sorc discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
For every 15 lengthy NB discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
DK improvements are questionable while their nerfs are irreversable.
warden... warden..... hmmmmmmm Like for a jail? are you a roleplayer lol.... sssshhhh you still have minor berserk, don't remind them.ESO_Nightingale wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »For every 20 lengthy Sorc discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
For every 15 lengthy NB discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
DK improvements are questionable while their nerfs are irreversable.
Then there's us wardens ignored by everyone.
ESO_Nightingale wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »For every 20 lengthy Sorc discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
For every 15 lengthy NB discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
DK improvements are questionable while their nerfs are irreversable.
Then there's us wardens ignored by everyone.
ESO_Nightingale wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »For every 20 lengthy Sorc discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
For every 15 lengthy NB discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
DK improvements are questionable while their nerfs are irreversable.
Then there's us wardens ignored by everyone.
What's Warden problem? I got a StamDen and dude's a cannon....
DisgracefulMind wrote: »ESO_Nightingale wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »For every 20 lengthy Sorc discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
For every 15 lengthy NB discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
DK improvements are questionable while their nerfs are irreversable.
Then there's us wardens ignored by everyone.
What's Warden problem? I got a StamDen and dude's a cannon....
Go reroll that stamden to a magden and you'll see.
Onefrkncrzypope wrote: »DisgracefulMind wrote: »ESO_Nightingale wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »For every 20 lengthy Sorc discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
For every 15 lengthy NB discussions there is a brief DK discussion.
DK improvements are questionable while their nerfs are irreversable.
Then there's us wardens ignored by everyone.
What's Warden problem? I got a StamDen and dude's a cannon....
Go reroll that stamden to a magden and you'll see.
But is this a warden thread? Not to be snippy
"The amount of self pity in this thread is insane." - a stamsorc
GeorgeBlack wrote: »"The amount of self pity in this thread is insane." - a stamsorc
Says the class with overloaded Hurricane, passives that give WD/stam rec from slotting any sorc ability, critical surge.
I am actually sick of seeing DK posts go like "....and stamsorc ofc..."
Nah...
Stamsorc is a great class with all the tools available to it to play any stamina weapon combination you like and be effective. Gtfo
No self pitty here.
Our class is forced in snb 2h 7th fury BS bs.
When the buffs that we receive are Seething Fury on a magika ability that works on 2 DoT abilities, while nerfing our wings you'd better not come here and add insult to injury.
Olupajmibanan wrote: »I am yet to see succesful stamDK in battlegrounds. I have tried it, but honestly, I have the feeling that in battlegrounds (and non-CP in general) stamDK is just a weaker version of stamden.
Not saying it is bad, just saying that what stamDK does, stamden can do the same but better.
StamDK (and stamsorc as well) needs major rework in order to give him distinguishable class identity. And the poison theme is certainly not the way to go.