Cloaking NBs in a group activity? yaaaah, I get the guy.
Cloaking NBs in a group activity? yaaaah, I get the guy.
This, those nightblades that come into a group activity and then go off and do solo with cloak. I really don't like nightblades on my team. With high skilled BG games you need all four to be together and soak up the damage together. So I get him.
Cloaking NBs in a group activity? yaaaah, I get the guy.
This, those nightblades that come into a group activity and then go off and do solo with cloak. I really don't like nightblades on my team. With high skilled BG games you need all four to be together and soak up the damage together. So I get him.
It's kind of expected. With access to cloak and high single target damage they aren't exactly made for group play.
Great question honestly, I'll say, no for them, since they sidestepped your question.oxygen_thief wrote: »do you know how it feels to be the only one visible person in your team? i dont blame him.
I give people crap all the time for playing nightblades in bgs. They seriously don't belong there, you're ruining the game for other people. If you're a nightblade in a bg and you're not a healer, then i don't want you. That simple, really.
You would have won that game if you were not a nightblade. Just saying.
MMOs don’t attract the best adjusted people, pvp and hardcore gamers even moreso. Some tea bagging is fine imo, harassment isn’t.
Just shrug it off. I actually get a kick out of getting people bent out of shape over silly things, that’s why I like NB. I wouldn’t say I troll unless I say in zone chat ‘WoW is the first and best MMO of all time’ just to see chat explode.
Don’t take it personally, it’s a perspective thing. If that guy was doing that to me I’d have a lot of fun with it. You have an opportunity for hours of entertainment with that guy.
Nightblades do not belong in those matches. It is a selfish playstyle that only lends itself effectively to solo play.
You said it yourself - you weren’t with the group.
He might have been rude, but he wasn’t wrong. He/she did carry the team.
I would’ve simply said “please don’t queue for BGs anymore on that class - it does not belong here”
I don’t blame the players at first because it is a result of poor balancing... but to repeatedly bring a class that is useless for groups to a group encounter while KNOWING that it’s a selfish playstyle is fundamentally selfish.
Nightblades do not belong in those matches. It is a selfish playstyle that only lends itself effectively to solo play.
You said it yourself - you weren’t with the group.
He might have been rude, but he wasn’t wrong. He/she did carry the team.
I would’ve simply said “please don’t queue for BGs anymore on that class - it does not belong here”
I don’t blame the players at first because it is a result of poor balancing... but to repeatedly bring a class that is useless for groups to a group encounter while KNOWING that it’s a selfish playstyle is fundamentally selfish.
InvictusApollo wrote: »Nightblades do not belong in those matches. It is a selfish playstyle that only lends itself effectively to solo play.
You said it yourself - you weren’t with the group.
He might have been rude, but he wasn’t wrong. He/she did carry the team.
I would’ve simply said “please don’t queue for BGs anymore on that class - it does not belong here”
I don’t blame the players at first because it is a result of poor balancing... but to repeatedly bring a class that is useless for groups to a group encounter while KNOWING that it’s a selfish playstyle is fundamentally selfish.
Could you please stop putting all nightblades in the same bag?
My magblade for example gives all team members 1k HOT and 250 spell and weapon damage, CCs enemies that attack them and tanks damage. It's a brawler build without Shadowy Disguise.
My stamblade on the other hand tanks enemies by jumping straight to the action and debuffs them with major fracture, bleeds and minor maim. It also heals teammembers with Vigor. It has Shadowy Disguise only to disengage should the situation be unfavourable. But I'm already thinking about switching to Dark Cloak for even more tankiness.
As you can see not all nightblades are sneaky gankers that do hit and runs. Some are built for helping the group.
The real problem here is that people have only one build and can't change it during the match to synergize with their team.
InvictusApollo wrote: »Nightblades do not belong in those matches. It is a selfish playstyle that only lends itself effectively to solo play.
You said it yourself - you weren’t with the group.
He might have been rude, but he wasn’t wrong. He/she did carry the team.
I would’ve simply said “please don’t queue for BGs anymore on that class - it does not belong here”
I don’t blame the players at first because it is a result of poor balancing... but to repeatedly bring a class that is useless for groups to a group encounter while KNOWING that it’s a selfish playstyle is fundamentally selfish.
Could you please stop putting all nightblades in the same bag?
My magblade for example gives all team members 1k HOT and 250 spell and weapon damage, CCs enemies that attack them and tanks damage. It's a brawler build without Shadowy Disguise.
My stamblade on the other hand tanks enemies by jumping straight to the action and debuffs them with major fracture, bleeds and minor maim. It also heals teammembers with Vigor. It has Shadowy Disguise only to disengage should the situation be unfavourable. But I'm already thinking about switching to Dark Cloak for even more tankiness.
As you can see not all nightblades are sneaky gankers that do hit and runs. Some are built for helping the group.
The real problem here is that people have only one build and can't change it during the match to synergize with their team.
If you’re going to play magblade support with buffs and heals for your group, why not roll a magden?
If you’re going to play magblade support with buffs and heals for your group, why not roll a magden?
I prefer my NB. The points you get from battlegrounds favour damage over healing, so getting to higher MMR is more about being good at damage then healing. For a templar or warden that’s easy, for a magblade that means using a lot of guild or destruction staff abilities.
Personally I think after trying Warden, Templar and NB as a pvp healer NBs are the strongest, though I don’t have a lot of experience on my Warden. Wardens are too short range for me and favour balling up. I solo queue and like the 28m NB healing range for disorganized pugs.
I’ve seen some good templar healers but don’t think I’ve seen a really strong warden healer too.
If you’re going to play magblade support with buffs and heals for your group, why not roll a magden?
I prefer my NB. The points you get from battlegrounds favour damage over healing, so getting to higher MMR is more about being good at damage then healing. For a templar or warden that’s easy, for a magblade that means using a lot of guild or destruction staff abilities.
Personally I think after trying Warden, Templar and NB as a pvp healer NBs are the strongest, though I don’t have a lot of experience on my Warden. Wardens are too short range for me and favour balling up. I solo queue and like the 28m NB healing range for disorganized pugs.
I’ve seen some good templar healers but don’t think I’ve seen a really strong warden healer too.
To be fair, I don't think there are very many Nightblade healers that are even trying to do Battlegrounds. There was one guy (who was supremely annoying with his fear traps) that I saw for a little bit, several months ago, but I don't remember his name offhand.If you’re going to play magblade support with buffs and heals for your group, why not roll a magden?
I prefer my NB. The points you get from battlegrounds favour damage over healing, so getting to higher MMR is more about being good at damage then healing. For a templar or warden that’s easy, for a magblade that means using a lot of guild or destruction staff abilities.
Personally I think after trying Warden, Templar and NB as a pvp healer NBs are the strongest, though I don’t have a lot of experience on my Warden. Wardens are too short range for me and favour balling up. I solo queue and like the 28m NB healing range for disorganized pugs.
I’ve seen some good templar healers but don’t think I’ve seen a really strong warden healer too.
Healers on other classes get moved up to higher MMR matches
To be fair, I don't think there are very many Nightblade healers that are even trying to do Battlegrounds. There was one guy (who was supremely annoying with his fear traps) that I saw for a little bit, several months ago, but I don't remember his name offhand.If you’re going to play magblade support with buffs and heals for your group, why not roll a magden?
I prefer my NB. The points you get from battlegrounds favour damage over healing, so getting to higher MMR is more about being good at damage then healing. For a templar or warden that’s easy, for a magblade that means using a lot of guild or destruction staff abilities.
Personally I think after trying Warden, Templar and NB as a pvp healer NBs are the strongest, though I don’t have a lot of experience on my Warden. Wardens are too short range for me and favour balling up. I solo queue and like the 28m NB healing range for disorganized pugs.
I’ve seen some good templar healers but don’t think I’ve seen a really strong warden healer too.
Healers on other classes get moved up to higher MMR matches
I'm not a dedicated healer, but still do a fair amount of it in some games (and depending on the situation, at times I may end up doing a lot more healing than I do damage). If you check the following screenshot:
You'll see that assists made up a huge portion of my personal score (WTB an execute plz), which I'm pretty confident influences your MMR. And while it may be more difficult for a Magicka Nightblade to cheese their AOE damage/assists than it is for my Warden, I would think that it'd still be possible with extensive use of Wall of Elements and some DOTs/light attacks as you're able.