At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Bouldercleave wrote: »I think they make changes like this to weed out the weak players. Slap adversity in the face of someone and you can tell quick if they are gonna sink or swim.
(joking BTW - or AM I?)
Yamenstein wrote: »At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Do you know what PTS stands for ?
Public Test Server.
Do you know what they do on the PTS?
Test changes, get feedback and then make further changes.
Does this mean the moment you cry "Give me back 7% flame damage" to the race that hasn't been known to be extra proficient in flame damage, that you'll get it ?
No.
What you should be doing is taking your builds to PTS, if you play on PC, and see how they perform with the new changes. After you have seen how they perform, and understood what the end goal is, then you can give obiective feed back in the PTS forums where it can be looked at and then discussed.
If you can't do that, because thinking both logically and objectively is too difficult and you still wish to exit the game and never play again. Then bye. I would advise deleting all your toons so you don't come back to the game as you might be turned off from having to do everything again.
Yamenstein wrote: »At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Do you know what PTS stands for ?
Public Test Server.
Do you know what they do on the PTS?
Test changes, get feedback and then make further changes.
Does this mean the moment you cry "Give me back 7% flame damage" to the race that hasn't been known to be extra proficient in flame damage, that you'll get it ?
No.
What you should be doing is taking your builds to PTS, if you play on PC, and see how they perform with the new changes. After you have seen how they perform, and understood what the end goal is, then you can give obiective feed back in the PTS forums where it can be looked at and then discussed.
If you can't do that, because thinking both logically and objectively is too difficult and you still wish to exit the game and never play again. Then bye. I would advise deleting all your toons so you don't come back to the game as you might be turned off from having to do everything again.
Ok. Let me just give you three random examples of why I don't PTS test anything anymore. If you can find any green text in these three Official Templar Feedback threads, other than the initial OP and occasional moderation, I'm admittedly wrong and you are right. O=
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #1
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #2
Official PTS Feedback Thread for Templars example #3
Sure two of the links are fairly old, but I've seen no change in this regard recently either (in some cases sure, but not overall). =(
There are many reasons to use the PTS, like gaining an advantage in theory crafting before the live release, training Trials and Dungeons etc, resulting in excellent guides when the product hits "Live", heck even trying out new CS costumes or new looks in the character creator before you buy a token for 3K Crowns on Live, if you want to.
Funny is that I did it to test and provide feedback so that at least a discussion with the devs might get started. The void of any reaction to that is what really tipped me over. I mean, just look at the elaborate testing and providing of meticulous, data, information and feedback in most posts, to no avail. Example, Example, Example.
We (or they) might as well have provided all that to the wind, but maybe even the wind would at least have cried Marry.
Yamenstein wrote: »Yamenstein wrote: »At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Do you know what PTS stands for ?
Public Test Server.
Do you know what they do on the PTS?
Test changes, get feedback and then make further changes.
Does this mean the moment you cry "Give me back 7% flame damage" to the race that hasn't been known to be extra proficient in flame damage, that you'll get it ?
No.
What you should be doing is taking your builds to PTS, if you play on PC, and see how they perform with the new changes. After you have seen how they perform, and understood what the end goal is, then you can give obiective feed back in the PTS forums where it can be looked at and then discussed.
If you can't do that, because thinking both logically and objectively is too difficult and you still wish to exit the game and never play again. Then bye. I would advise deleting all your toons so you don't come back to the game as you might be turned off from having to do everything again.
Ok. Let me just give you three random examples of why I don't PTS test anything anymore. If you can find any green text in these three Official Templar Feedback threads, other than the initial OP and occasional moderation, I'm admittedly wrong and you are right. O=
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #1
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #2
Official PTS Feedback Thread for Templars example #3
Sure two of the links are fairly old, but I've seen no change in this regard recently either (in some cases sure, but not overall). =(
There are many reasons to use the PTS, like gaining an advantage in theory crafting before the live release, training Trials and Dungeons etc, resulting in excellent guides when the product hits "Live", heck even trying out new CS costumes or new looks in the character creator before you buy a token for 3K Crowns on Live, if you want to.
Funny is that I did it to test and provide feedback so that at least a discussion with the devs might get started. The void of any reaction to that is what really tipped me over. I mean, just look at the elaborate testing and providing of meticulous, data, information and feedback in most posts, to no avail. Example, Example, Example.
We (or they) might as well have provided all that to the wind, but maybe even the wind would at least have cried Marry.
Just because a developer or moderator doesn't reply to a thread doesn't mean they don't take down what you say.
Giving feedback is still an opportunity to create discussion, not just among the players who are replying back to you but developers can discuss internally as well.
Yamenstein wrote: »Yamenstein wrote: »At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Do you know what PTS stands for ?
Public Test Server.
Do you know what they do on the PTS?
Test changes, get feedback and then make further changes.
Does this mean the moment you cry "Give me back 7% flame damage" to the race that hasn't been known to be extra proficient in flame damage, that you'll get it ?
No.
What you should be doing is taking your builds to PTS, if you play on PC, and see how they perform with the new changes. After you have seen how they perform, and understood what the end goal is, then you can give obiective feed back in the PTS forums where it can be looked at and then discussed.
If you can't do that, because thinking both logically and objectively is too difficult and you still wish to exit the game and never play again. Then bye. I would advise deleting all your toons so you don't come back to the game as you might be turned off from having to do everything again.
Ok. Let me just give you three random examples of why I don't PTS test anything anymore. If you can find any green text in these three Official Templar Feedback threads, other than the initial OP and occasional moderation, I'm admittedly wrong and you are right. O=
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #1
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #2
Official PTS Feedback Thread for Templars example #3
Sure two of the links are fairly old, but I've seen no change in this regard recently either (in some cases sure, but not overall). =(
There are many reasons to use the PTS, like gaining an advantage in theory crafting before the live release, training Trials and Dungeons etc, resulting in excellent guides when the product hits "Live", heck even trying out new CS costumes or new looks in the character creator before you buy a token for 3K Crowns on Live, if you want to.
Funny is that I did it to test and provide feedback so that at least a discussion with the devs might get started. The void of any reaction to that is what really tipped me over. I mean, just look at the elaborate testing and providing of meticulous, data, information and feedback in most posts, to no avail. Example, Example, Example.
We (or they) might as well have provided all that to the wind, but maybe even the wind would at least have cried Marry.
Just because a developer or moderator doesn't reply to a thread doesn't mean they don't take down what you say.
Giving feedback is still an opportunity to create discussion, not just among the players who are replying back to you but developers can discuss internally as well.
Why don't you read the comments in these threads. What you are saying is just words, theory, what is in those posts are hard facts. Post after post state "still not fixed", "still same bug as reported". I get your position is locked, but offer something else than theories will you.
I'm just stating the reson for me not to PTS anymore. Feel free to think of that what ever you want and keep giving PTS feedback into, the way I see it but clearly you don't, an empty void. Why not? I'm not bashing you for it, like "If you can't do that, because thinking both logically and objectively is too difficult...".
Yamenstein wrote: »Yamenstein wrote: »Yamenstein wrote: »At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Do you know what PTS stands for ?
Public Test Server.
Do you know what they do on the PTS?
Test changes, get feedback and then make further changes.
Does this mean the moment you cry "Give me back 7% flame damage" to the race that hasn't been known to be extra proficient in flame damage, that you'll get it ?
No.
What you should be doing is taking your builds to PTS, if you play on PC, and see how they perform with the new changes. After you have seen how they perform, and understood what the end goal is, then you can give obiective feed back in the PTS forums where it can be looked at and then discussed.
If you can't do that, because thinking both logically and objectively is too difficult and you still wish to exit the game and never play again. Then bye. I would advise deleting all your toons so you don't come back to the game as you might be turned off from having to do everything again.
Ok. Let me just give you three random examples of why I don't PTS test anything anymore. If you can find any green text in these three Official Templar Feedback threads, other than the initial OP and occasional moderation, I'm admittedly wrong and you are right. O=
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #1
Official Feedback Thread for Templars example #2
Official PTS Feedback Thread for Templars example #3
Sure two of the links are fairly old, but I've seen no change in this regard recently either (in some cases sure, but not overall). =(
There are many reasons to use the PTS, like gaining an advantage in theory crafting before the live release, training Trials and Dungeons etc, resulting in excellent guides when the product hits "Live", heck even trying out new CS costumes or new looks in the character creator before you buy a token for 3K Crowns on Live, if you want to.
Funny is that I did it to test and provide feedback so that at least a discussion with the devs might get started. The void of any reaction to that is what really tipped me over. I mean, just look at the elaborate testing and providing of meticulous, data, information and feedback in most posts, to no avail. Example, Example, Example.
We (or they) might as well have provided all that to the wind, but maybe even the wind would at least have cried Marry.
Just because a developer or moderator doesn't reply to a thread doesn't mean they don't take down what you say.
Giving feedback is still an opportunity to create discussion, not just among the players who are replying back to you but developers can discuss internally as well.
Why don't you read the comments in these threads. What you are saying is just words, theory, what is in those posts are hard facts. Post after post state "still not fixed", "still same bug as reported". I get your position is locked, but offer something else than theories will you.
I'm just stating the reson for me not to PTS anymore. Feel free to think of that what ever you want and keep giving PTS feedback into, the way I see it but clearly you don't, an empty void. Why not? I'm not bashing you for it, like "If you can't do that, because thinking both logically and objectively is too difficult...".
If you could point out those bugs that are still not fixed please, I don't see myself going through every single post looking for this.
Am I saying that when you give feedback in the PTS it will be changed ? No. The most recent thread you linked, for Murkmire, opens with posts complimenting the changes that have been made. I'm sure someone found something to complain about though at some point.
Just because someone wants something changed, outside of a bug fix, doesn't mean it should be changed. Everyone has different views on where the game should be going and at the end of the day the developers/owner makes the final decision.
If you don't want to post in PTS then don't. That's not my problem.
Not bashing YOU for not wanting to give feedback on PTS.
Daedric_NB_187 wrote: »What made you think they wouldn't?
Well obviously we were supposed to trust all the people who said that players should stop worrying because the changes "aren't even on PTS yet!"...
... Yep, look at those big changes between the announcement and the implementation on PTS. Ooooh, I feel better already. /s
Daedric_NB_187 wrote: »What made you think they wouldn't?
Well obviously we were supposed to trust all the people who said that players should stop worrying because the changes "aren't even on PTS yet!"...
... Yep, look at those big changes between the announcement and the implementation on PTS. Ooooh, I feel better already. /s
I guess you missed the point of "wait for pts". It's not "wait for patch notes", it's wait for testing, see how it goes, then you worry. Hitting pts with the same changes as before is *necessary*. Whining doesn't mean I poop to anyone. And between them releasing race changes and the pts, there was onlyr whining and no testing.
If you can't understand that, let me know and I'll make a drawing on paint, with a timeline and a golden star for you.
Daedric_NB_187 wrote: »What made you think they wouldn't?
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Early DPS testing indicates Khajiit are BiS for magicka DPS, apparently by a wide margin too, lol. Followed by Breton.
Having Khajiit be the BiS race for magicka, ahead of Altmer, Dunmer, and Breton is insanely lore-breaking if it makes it to live. Even having Breton ahead of the elves is kind of silly, although easier to swallow (and apparently the difference there is small).
Daedric_NB_187 wrote: »What made you think they wouldn't?
Well obviously we were supposed to trust all the people who said that players should stop worrying because the changes "aren't even on PTS yet!"...
... Yep, look at those big changes between the announcement and the implementation on PTS. Ooooh, I feel better already. /s
I guess you missed the point of "wait for pts". It's not "wait for patch notes", it's wait for testing, see how it goes, then you worry. Hitting pts with the same changes as before is *necessary*. Whining doesn't mean I poop to anyone. And between them releasing race changes and the pts, there was onlyr whining and no testing.
If you can't understand that, let me know and I'll make a drawing on paint, with a timeline and a golden star for you.
Ah, so you were one of the people who were saying that people should stop complaining? After all, my initial sentence was addressed generally. Rather than specifically at you.
The PTS point assumes that the people reading the patch notes are unable to grasp whether the suggested changes are going to leave them worse or better off. If ZOS thought us incapable of drawing conclusions based on the information, why post it early?
If the point being made was that players would not be aware of all of the subtleties, then there is a discussion to be had there. But the "don't complain until PTS" line fails for me. The general thrust of the changes are not so impenetrable or mysterious as all that.
CipherNine wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Early DPS testing indicates Khajiit are BiS for magicka DPS, apparently by a wide margin too, lol. Followed by Breton.
Having Khajiit be the BiS race for magicka, ahead of Altmer, Dunmer, and Breton is insanely lore-breaking if it makes it to live. Even having Breton ahead of the elves is kind of silly, although easier to swallow (and apparently the difference there is small).
Actually it's not lore breaking. The current racial passives don't make any sense for a TES game either.
Every other TES game you did the same amount of dmg no matter what race you were. The racial passives in all the other games were completely negligible. Whatever race you played in TES has always been solely a cosmetic or RP choice. Then comes ESO and everyone just forgets how all the other games actually were and you have this lore nonsense excuses for racial passives.
Just wait till TES VI comes out and the racial passives in that WILL be so minimal they won't matter. Same with every other TES game.
OtarTheMad wrote: »These patch notes look good overall. And really what is the difference between 7% flame damage and 258 spell damage. Is it that much of a drop?
rexagamemnon wrote: »My favorite race is imperial, but i prefer to use magika, i dont see how im affected for my main 2 characters.
At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Sanctuary_Reaper wrote: »You can still buff flame damage by using set gear for Dunmer magdks, maybe adding a flat number to flame damage in the passives would of been better than removing it altogether, anyway one example below you could use.
Silks of the Sun
(2 items) Adds 1206 Maximum Health
(3 items) Adds 1096 Maximum Magicka
(4 items) Adds 129 Spell Damage
(5 items) Adds 400 Spell Damage to your Flame Damage abilities.
DaveMoeDee wrote: »Sanctuary_Reaper wrote: »You can still buff flame damage by using set gear for Dunmer magdks, maybe adding a flat number to flame damage in the passives would of been better than removing it altogether, anyway one example below you could use.
Silks of the Sun
(2 items) Adds 1206 Maximum Health
(3 items) Adds 1096 Maximum Magicka
(4 items) Adds 129 Spell Damage
(5 items) Adds 400 Spell Damage to your Flame Damage abilities.
Sure. Some of our Dunmer were already using that. Kinda irrelevant to the details of the Dunmer analysis. Dunmer just contribute a lot less now to many current builds, esp DD magDKs. Changing gear won't change that.
At least that's what it looks like since they're live on the PTS.
I don't think I want to keep playing this game. I haven't launched it in like 4 days.
I really don't want High Elves to somehow regenerate Stamina and Dark Elves to lose Flame Damage. Dark Elves are literally High Elves but with Stamina points, so why the hell are High Elves getting this?
Daedric_NB_187 wrote: »What made you think they wouldn't?
Well obviously we were supposed to trust all the people who said that players should stop worrying because the changes "aren't even on PTS yet!"...
... Yep, look at those big changes between the announcement and the implementation on PTS. Ooooh, I feel better already. /s