Saint314Louis1985 wrote: »
Console players can be as insufferable as PvPeeps. The fact is that a non Steam PC ZOS gives you the best possible experience. BTW, you can run this game just fine on a $500 PC.
“Just fine”? You mean on medium settings, with subsampling set to medium? Because looking at bestbuy.ca and newegg.ca, that’s about what I’d get for a new PC in the $500 range.
do you honestly think that consoles run games on ultra settings? they don't btw.
oh and one other thing. becasue it IS personal preference, I saw above someone complaining about having to map keys. inability to map my keys is the number one reason I personal prefer playing on pc. and I HAVE a console. I have nothing against consoles. its a personal choice. but every time I die on a console becasue I switched games and on one of them x was "go into cover" while on the other x is "vault over cover" and there is NOTHING I can do about it other then try to relearn muscle memory each time a switch? I long for ability to standardize my keybinds like I can on PC.
plug and play functionality of a console is awesome. but not all of us actualy want plug and play. some of us actualy prefer to tweak or experience. and BOTH are fine, one is NOT inherently superior to the other. its... gasp.. a PERSONAL PREFERENCE!
LOL, no, I don’t think console is ultra... I do know it’s not medium with medium subsampling, though.How do I know? Because that’s how I had to play the game on my $600 PC before I switched to PS4.
except consoles generally run games on medium. how do I know? there are a few games I have on both console and PC in part becasue I loved them enough to want to play them that many times (hi Tomb Raider reboots, and I still cannot decide which version I prefer to be honest), and some I got through ps plus and in case of Division - I oroginaly played it on ps4, but then my SO got into it, so we both got pc copies to play together. I also happen to have steamlink so I have streamed my pc games onto my TV screen. the biggest difference I saw was with Division, but it wasn't the only one that I saw a difference with. console graphics and framerates are medium..ish settings in vast majority of cases, at least when it comes to AAA titles. it doesn't seem glaring unless you play them side by side... which I did.
I will say this much. I'm very VERY thankful for games coming out on both consoles and PC. why? becasue console hardware limitations means developers cannot push game graphics to the point where i HAVE to buy a new PC to play them. back in a day of pc exclusive AAA games you had to update your PC more often. nowadays, becasue it has to look and run good enough on all platforms - the only settings that push hardware are of the higher variety, and so you can get away with playing on an older PC. its nice.
'not as good' is a bit of a statement. Personally i prefer it. PC has too many grey areas for me.
Do you have platform numbers from ZOS or is this a guesstimate? Not having a pop just curious on stats. If you take views of patch notes as a lead, 50k PC, 22k Xbox 13k PS4. HOWEVER as you can tell if you frequent the forum daily the vast majority of folk here are on PC. I'm one of a few i know in Xbox EU that come here, most console players aren't aware it exists (which is an issue in itself as i say later)
Personally i think its simpler, you assume its the experience comparison but i doubt that. I think first of all games been out alot longer on PC and secondly its MORE a PC style of game. Most console players i know shift between games fast and are more into instant gratification games - FPS etc.
This is a vast game, and a new genre to Console in this format. It's that simple i would say.
Additionally you need an online resource to get anywhere with this game. Most console games aren't like that and i bet many copies are sat i used as folks didn't even get out of Davons Watch without thinking WTF am i doing.
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »
Who purchases Gold or PSN for full price? No one other than family members that don't know any better. Then there's the fact, most people don't purchase games for full price either. Here in the UK console games usually retail for £40-50. again, no one pays those prices. Don't think i've paid more than £35 for a new release this gen. Same with consoles. Too many bargains/sales out there that no one should be paying the RRP for any console.
I mean, I should be paying £450 for this console: https://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/xbox-one-x-shadow-of-the-tomb-raider-fifa-19-37378-microsoft-swiss-3057945
But next to no one does. You're graphs are meaningless to most people other than grandparents that walk into any old shop and pay the first price they lay their eyes on.
As for my widescreen TV. Here's a revelation, I didn't just purchase it to play games on. Crazy i know, but it's possible to watch normal TV on it. hell, even watch blu rays etc.
Discuss
your comparing apples with oranges. a $500 pc will not be running the same spec RAM (DDR5) as the consoles , nor will it be running a 4k graphics card. Nor will the processors have as many cores or be as good.
in addition, you've put the games on consoles as more expensive. they are roughly the same price here in the UK. in fact the steam version of ESO on PC is £10 MORE than the xb1x version in game at the moment.
in terms of pure math, your graph is flawed by those two facts.
LadyLethalla wrote: »because we're mostly adults
You're saying adults don't play on console?
Heads up... I stopped playing PC games with Oblivion because it got too expensive to continually upgrade a PC. More of my ESO friends - console players also - are adults than not. Could I afford a PC capable of running ESO now? Sure, but a) I couldn't justify it and b) I wouldn't want to start over. Also c) 55" 4k TV.
Console players can be as insufferable as PvPeeps. The fact is that a non Steam PC ZOS gives you the best possible experience. BTW, you can run this game just fine on a $500 PC.
“Just fine”? You mean on medium settings, with subsampling set to medium? Because looking at bestbuy.ca and newegg.ca, that’s about what I’d get for a new PC in the $500 range.
do you honestly think that consoles run games on ultra settings? they don't btw.
oh and one other thing. becasue it IS personal preference, I saw above someone complaining about having to map keys. inability to map my keys is the number one reason I personal prefer playing on pc. and I HAVE a console. I have nothing against consoles. its a personal choice. but every time I die on a console becasue I switched games and on one of them x was "go into cover" while on the other x is "vault over cover" and there is NOTHING I can do about it other then try to relearn muscle memory each time a switch? I long for ability to standardize my keybinds like I can on PC.
plug and play functionality of a console is awesome. but not all of us actualy want plug and play. some of us actualy prefer to tweak or experience. and BOTH are fine, one is NOT inherently superior to the other. its... gasp.. a PERSONAL PREFERENCE!
LOL, no, I don’t think console is ultra... I do know it’s not medium with medium subsampling, though.How do I know? Because that’s how I had to play the game on my $600 PC before I switched to PS4.
except consoles generally run games on medium. how do I know? there are a few games I have on both console and PC in part becasue I loved them enough to want to play them that many times (hi Tomb Raider reboots, and I still cannot decide which version I prefer to be honest), and some I got through ps plus and in case of Division - I oroginaly played it on ps4, but then my SO got into it, so we both got pc copies to play together. I also happen to have steamlink so I have streamed my pc games onto my TV screen. the biggest difference I saw was with Division, but it wasn't the only one that I saw a difference with. console graphics and framerates are medium..ish settings in vast majority of cases, at least when it comes to AAA titles. it doesn't seem glaring unless you play them side by side... which I did.
I will say this much. I'm very VERY thankful for games coming out on both consoles and PC. why? becasue console hardware limitations means developers cannot push game graphics to the point where i HAVE to buy a new PC to play them. back in a day of pc exclusive AAA games you had to update your PC more often. nowadays, becasue it has to look and run good enough on all platforms - the only settings that push hardware are of the higher variety, and so you can get away with playing on an older PC. its nice.
Console developers also generally manage to optimize games pretty well for the limitations. Games like Horizon Zero Dawn and Uncharted 4 are absolutely gorgeous. Yeah, PC will always have better graphical options, but the price point still favours consoles for people who want to game inexpensively and without fuss. I could not walk into a store today and buy a new PC that allows me to play ESO (or any other game, for that matter) at the same quality as my PS4 for the same price.
DeadlyRecluse wrote: »I'm a console gamer. I spend all day (work from home) at a PC with a mouse and keyboard. That's the last place I want to be when the work day is over. ESO in HDR is beautiful, and it runs really well on the PS4 Pro.
I understand why people say PCs have more horsepower, and I don't doubt it. But for me, being able to chill on the couch in the evenings with just ESO, a controller and a nice big 4K HDR TV makes me happy.
The "PCs have more horsepower" thing is mostly irrelevant when considering the populations on both platforms, imo. Most people I know who play ESO on PC have significantly less horsepower than current gen consoles. Let's not even speak of our poor Mac brethren.
I really think it's just preference/convenience.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***