I find myself wondering… Have ZOS overburdened themselves with their goals of yearly content releases?
For example, just looking at the random wildlife in Summerset… Things like welwas and fellrunners. Obviously pulled right from Craglorn. Though, the lore guy was on ESO Live and stated that welwas apparently originated in Summerset and were removed due to ferocity and just plain being uncivilized… Whether that’s true official Tamrielic history, or just the writing they came up with to shorten development time, who knows or cares.
The point is, there is only so much developers can produce in “X” amount of time. And with the likes of 2 dungeon DLCs, a QoL update, a story DLC, and a chapter being pumped out each year… Can devs and the art team reasonably be expected to create so many unique aspects in all this content in such a specific amount of time?
I am still disappointed to see they cut corners with the main antagonist appearance, yet they certainly found time to make a gorgeous Nocturnal statue for the RNG crates….
TL/DR: I’m not trying to make a back-handed point. I am sincerely asking if all this content each year is a reasonable expectation, and goal, for a top-quality video game?
A_Silverius wrote: »At the moment I think a quick fix for this is to replace her current model with one of the shrikes. Please Zos They look better than the nocturnal we have atm which looks just like another player character.
I'm not sure what she's trying to do here because of that poker face.
Damn it, looks like a voices in the wilderness type of situation.are we gonna replace nocturnal with the statue model?
I mean, that devs will not give any comments regarding the situation any soon. Which is quite sad.logarifmik wrote: »
?
Are the devs gonna give us a nocturnal that looks like her statue
LadyNalcarya wrote: »I dont think its a bad idea to make her black. Imo the problem is that she's bald and her animations could be a little bit more... graceful.
I think just adding a unique hairstyle+maybe glowing eyes+skyrim-esque floating pose would be great.
LadyNalcarya wrote: »I dont think its a bad idea to make her black. Imo the problem is that she's bald and her animations could be a little bit more... graceful.
I think just adding a unique hairstyle+maybe glowing eyes+skyrim-esque floating pose would be great.
We dont care that she is a redguard as long as she is beautiful as the statue above
AhPook_Is_Here wrote: »She kinda looks like the exec from westworld... Tessa Thompson
You didn't understand a damn thing or just playing the fool.10 pages of people upset because they can't sexually objectify a daedric prince.
Please explain to me how I'm supposed to support this is "wrong" by the developers.
Good luck with trying.
LadyNalcarya wrote: »I dont think its a bad idea to make her black. Imo the problem is that she's bald and her animations could be a little bit more... graceful.
I think just adding a unique hairstyle+maybe glowing eyes+skyrim-esque floating pose would be great.
10 pages of people upset because they can't sexually objectify a daedric prince.
Please explain to me how I'm supposed to support this is "wrong" by the developers.
Good luck with trying.
10 pages of people upset because they can't sexually objectify a daedric prince.
Please explain to me how I'm supposed to support this is "wrong" by the developers.
Good luck with trying.
hmsdragonfly wrote: »hmsdragonfly wrote: »You cant say that she was done without efforts. In TES she looks like woman in specific dress. And we got this dress in crown store, so obviously she was done as generic woman with this dress.
It is game engine that not allow to make it look as attractive as you want.
For example compare how things looks on game engine and art:
AlmalexiaHow she in ESO:
And compare to Legends art:
Or Golden Saint:How it look in ESO (not completely her, but npc look similar to ordinary race, only gear is different):
And compare to Legends art:
Difference is drastical and its not developers to blame about it.
Mephala looks good:
Why can't Nocturnal? Of course it's not the engine's fault here, we all know that, there's no point blaming the engine here when clearly you can make custom character with this engine as a matter of fact.
It's not about making her look as good as in the concept art, with the decision of taking the default Redguard model and slapping a crownstore custome on her, she looks bland and boring in the concept herself.
She looks like dunmer woman with bright eyes in special outfit and spider legs, i.e. like her statue does, same as Nocturnal.
But Mephala indeed looks much cooler coz her basic concept is cool, unlike Nocturnal who is just half nude female.
Almalexia is a Dark Elf so ofcourse she looks like a Dark Elf. Should a Dark Elf look like a Breton instead? I think not.
Even so Almalexia has a special outfit. Does Nocturnal? No she doesn't. Nocturnal's character model is just a default Redguard woman character model, and she has a crownstore costume on her. So much for a Daedric Prince. I guess I can slap that crownstore costume on my Redguard character and tadaaaaa I am Nocturnal. This is pathetic actually.
hmsdragonfly wrote: »hmsdragonfly wrote: »You cant say that she was done without efforts. In TES she looks like woman in specific dress. And we got this dress in crown store, so obviously she was done as generic woman with this dress.
It is game engine that not allow to make it look as attractive as you want.
For example compare how things looks on game engine and art:
AlmalexiaHow she in ESO:
And compare to Legends art:
Or Golden Saint:How it look in ESO (not completely her, but npc look similar to ordinary race, only gear is different):
And compare to Legends art:
Difference is drastical and its not developers to blame about it.
Mephala looks good:
Why can't Nocturnal? Of course it's not the engine's fault here, we all know that, there's no point blaming the engine here when clearly you can make custom character with this engine as a matter of fact.
It's not about making her look as good as in the concept art, with the decision of taking the default Redguard model and slapping a crownstore custome on her, she looks bland and boring in the concept herself.
She looks like dunmer woman with bright eyes in special outfit and spider legs, i.e. like her statue does, same as Nocturnal.
But Mephala indeed looks much cooler coz her basic concept is cool, unlike Nocturnal who is just half nude female.
Almalexia is a Dark Elf so ofcourse she looks like a Dark Elf. Should a Dark Elf look like a Breton instead? I think not.
Even so Almalexia has a special outfit. Does Nocturnal? No she doesn't. Nocturnal's character model is just a default Redguard woman character model, and she has a crownstore costume on her. So much for a Daedric Prince. I guess I can slap that crownstore costume on my Redguard character and tadaaaaa I am Nocturnal. This is pathetic actually.
It's sad thatI and other players who got the costume can make a better looking nocturnal than ZOS.
10 pages of people upset because they can't sexually objectify a daedric prince.
Please explain to me how I'm supposed to support this is "wrong" by the developers.
Good luck with trying.
Stop right there, now we are talking, I generally objectify my lady but there's a hottie we can all go drinking with too! Phwoar! It's the mammoth essence. He's adorable. More sex in his pudgy ring finger than any daedric prince.10 pages of people upset because they can't sexually objectify a daedric prince.
Please explain to me how I'm supposed to support this is "wrong" by the developers.
Good luck with trying.
Because I can sexually objectify Darien as well and we need equality. The ladies (and men) have rigurt,
Or they just can remake the statue to match the actual Nocturnal model.10 pages now, I would like to know if zos plans to make nocturnal look like her statue or at the least reskin a shrike to look more unique