Nihility42 wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »I'm thinking that if we all start insulting each other, ZOS will have to come in and close down this unimaginably stupid thread.
OP, delete your account, go play a different game, and get bent.
I hate you. You shouldn't even be playing this game you dumb, meanie
Nightblades are really weak right now. We should give them access to major defile tied into a burst, two “reset” buttons, the ability to always be the initiator of any fight they want, a debuff that increases dmg taken by 20% on anyone they defile, great class damage passives, a guaranteed crit heal on their rally when used after cloak, a high delve gap closer that also debuffs, an insanely high dmg burst that procs after five light attacks (oh and minor berserk), and the best CC in the game (fear). We could also make it so that their escape skills cost Magicka so that they can alternate between those and roll dodge seamlessly.
But let’s not give them all those things because then it would be a broken class and we’d probably see close to 40% of the cyrodil population switch to it.
Bonzodog01 wrote: »You should try taking a stamblade into a dungeon, any dungeon sometime. They will fail horribly, as they have no real sustain for handling the boss fights. Magblades do a lot better at this, but still lack the DPS in comparison.
The only place where Stamblades and magblades stand out is in PvP, and any competent mage can uncloak a stealthed nightblade with ease, at which point they become very squishy.
Not that I'm advocating any nerfs, but can only laugh at the complete lack of current meta knowledge.
In PvE both types of NB are literally at the top of their respective trees damage-wise. Nothing hits harder or sustains better than a magblade or a stamblade since Morrowind. Sorcs and StamDKs are literally the only other classes which people take for DPS in trials and that's mostly for debuffing/buffing with Sunderflame, Attronach and Concussion.
Magblades and Stamblades are so far ahead of anything else in ranged and melee damage that they have practically caused the extinction of MagDK, MagPlar and StamPlar DDs from trials. And Wardens don't even get a look-in. But yeah, I'm sure NBs suck in PvE
Stamplar? Potl? But yeah, nbs are in a good spot, no buffs nor nerfs needed for them. Buff other classes, likely with more group utility
What about potl? It has a cap on damage, which a single DD will hit in 2-3 seconds. It's just a burst damage skill, not one that helps the group in any way. Bosses are already being fully penetrated by Torugs with Cursher, Sunder, NMG and Alkosh.
Stamblades have better sustain through Siphoning, better group utility through War Machine + Incap and are better in both overall damage and especially during the burn phase due to having an execute.
You can have a stamplar running sunder and wm as a result
You're not gonna have Stamplars running WM or Sunder. Sunder works for DKs because of Molten Armaments, for anyone else, heavy attack is a big loss of DPS (so is for DK, but it's small enough to be acceptable). Crescent Sweep is a waste of an ultie when talking about trial raids, Ballista is better for single target boss deeps and since you want two WM at most in a raid it works better for NBs cause the buff to damage from Incap is insane.
And finally the Illuminate passive for Minor Sorcery, I don't recall what the range of it is, but I remember in years past that it was not reliable to apply to your ranged DDs, which are all the magicka DDs. And there are no magicka melee DPS in raids atm.
Bonzodog01 wrote: »You should try taking a stamblade into a dungeon, any dungeon sometime. They will fail horribly, as they have no real sustain for handling the boss fights. Magblades do a lot better at this, but still lack the DPS in comparison.
The only place where Stamblades and magblades stand out is in PvP, and any competent mage can uncloak a stealthed nightblade with ease, at which point they become very squishy.
Not that I'm advocating any nerfs, but can only laugh at the complete lack of current meta knowledge.
In PvE both types of NB are literally at the top of their respective trees damage-wise. Nothing hits harder or sustains better than a magblade or a stamblade since Morrowind. Sorcs and StamDKs are literally the only other classes which people take for DPS in trials and that's mostly for debuffing/buffing with Sunderflame, Attronach and Concussion.
Magblades and Stamblades are so far ahead of anything else in ranged and melee damage that they have practically caused the extinction of MagDK, MagPlar and StamPlar DDs from trials. And Wardens don't even get a look-in. But yeah, I'm sure NBs suck in PvE
Stamplar? Potl? But yeah, nbs are in a good spot, no buffs nor nerfs needed for them. Buff other classes, likely with more group utility
What about potl? It has a cap on damage, which a single DD will hit in 2-3 seconds. It's just a burst damage skill, not one that helps the group in any way. Bosses are already being fully penetrated by Torugs with Cursher, Sunder, NMG and Alkosh.
Stamblades have better sustain through Siphoning, better group utility through War Machine + Incap and are better in both overall damage and especially during the burn phase due to having an execute.
You can have a stamplar running sunder and wm as a result
You're not gonna have Stamplars running WM or Sunder. Sunder works for DKs because of Molten Armaments, for anyone else, heavy attack is a big loss of DPS (so is for DK, but it's small enough to be acceptable). Crescent Sweep is a waste of an ultie when talking about trial raids, Ballista is better for single target boss deeps and since you want two WM at most in a raid it works better for NBs cause the buff to damage from Incap is insane.
And finally the Illuminate passive for Minor Sorcery, I don't recall what the range of it is, but I remember in years past that it was not reliable to apply to your ranged DDs, which are all the magicka DDs. And there are no magicka melee DPS in raids atm.
Stam sorcs beneifit from heavies too with bound arraments, so why arent they a canidate? and why 2 at the most? That covers 2 people + at most 4 others which is 6 total, and even so, one or more of those 4 people could be the tanks, which means it is wasted. With 3 wms or more, you reliabilly hit the dps with the buff more.
Nightblades are really weak right now. We should give them access to major defile tied into a burst, two “reset” buttons, the ability to always be the initiator of any fight they want, a debuff that increases dmg taken by 20% on anyone they defile, great class damage passives, a guaranteed crit heal on their rally when used after cloak, a high delve gap closer that also debuffs, an insanely high dmg burst that procs after five light attacks (oh and minor berserk), and the best CC in the game (fear). We could also make it so that their escape skills cost Magicka so that they can alternate between those and roll dodge seamlessly.
But let’s not give them all those things because then it would be a broken class and we’d probably see close to 40% of the cyrodil population switch to it.
So what you did was list all of the Nightblade advantages in a one-sided comparison with nothing to compare them to. Who is their opponent, an inanimate wooden log?
Bonzodog01 wrote: »You should try taking a stamblade into a dungeon, any dungeon sometime. They will fail horribly, as they have no real sustain for handling the boss fights. Magblades do a lot better at this, but still lack the DPS in comparison.
The only place where Stamblades and magblades stand out is in PvP, and any competent mage can uncloak a stealthed nightblade with ease, at which point they become very squishy.
Not that I'm advocating any nerfs, but can only laugh at the complete lack of current meta knowledge.
In PvE both types of NB are literally at the top of their respective trees damage-wise. Nothing hits harder or sustains better than a magblade or a stamblade since Morrowind. Sorcs and StamDKs are literally the only other classes which people take for DPS in trials and that's mostly for debuffing/buffing with Sunderflame, Attronach and Concussion.
Magblades and Stamblades are so far ahead of anything else in ranged and melee damage that they have practically caused the extinction of MagDK, MagPlar and StamPlar DDs from trials. And Wardens don't even get a look-in. But yeah, I'm sure NBs suck in PvE
Stamplar? Potl? But yeah, nbs are in a good spot, no buffs nor nerfs needed for them. Buff other classes, likely with more group utility
What about potl? It has a cap on damage, which a single DD will hit in 2-3 seconds. It's just a burst damage skill, not one that helps the group in any way. Bosses are already being fully penetrated by Torugs with Cursher, Sunder, NMG and Alkosh.
Stamblades have better sustain through Siphoning, better group utility through War Machine + Incap and are better in both overall damage and especially during the burn phase due to having an execute.
You can have a stamplar running sunder and wm as a result
You're not gonna have Stamplars running WM or Sunder. Sunder works for DKs because of Molten Armaments, for anyone else, heavy attack is a big loss of DPS (so is for DK, but it's small enough to be acceptable). Crescent Sweep is a waste of an ultie when talking about trial raids, Ballista is better for single target boss deeps and since you want two WM at most in a raid it works better for NBs cause the buff to damage from Incap is insane.
And finally the Illuminate passive for Minor Sorcery, I don't recall what the range of it is, but I remember in years past that it was not reliable to apply to your ranged DDs, which are all the magicka DDs. And there are no magicka melee DPS in raids atm.
Stam sorcs beneifit from heavies too with bound arraments, so why arent they a canidate? and why 2 at the most? That covers 2 people + at most 4 others which is 6 total, and even so, one or more of those 4 people could be the tanks, which means it is wasted. With 3 wms or more, you reliabilly hit the dps with the buff more.
And it is 28m I suspect, never had an jssue with giving the buff to mag dps as my stamplar
Nightblades are really weak right now. We should give them access to major defile tied into a burst, two “reset” buttons, the ability to always be the initiator of any fight they want, a debuff that increases dmg taken by 20% on anyone they defile, great class damage passives, a guaranteed crit heal on their rally when used after cloak, a high delve gap closer that also debuffs, an insanely high dmg burst that procs after five light attacks (oh and minor berserk), and the best CC in the game (fear). We could also make it so that their escape skills cost Magicka so that they can alternate between those and roll dodge seamlessly.
But let’s not give them all those things because then it would be a broken class and we’d probably see close to 40% of the cyrodil population switch to it.
So what you did was list all of the Nightblade advantages in a one-sided comparison with nothing to compare them to. Who is their opponent, an inanimate wooden log?
Well given the current population trends, their opponent would almost certainly be another stamblade.
So yeah it's perfectly balanced.
Nightblades are really weak right now. We should give them access to major defile tied into a burst, two “reset” buttons, the ability to always be the initiator of any fight they want, a debuff that increases dmg taken by 20% on anyone they defile, great class damage passives, a guaranteed crit heal on their rally when used after cloak, a high delve gap closer that also debuffs, an insanely high dmg burst that procs after five light attacks (oh and minor berserk), and the best CC in the game (fear). We could also make it so that their escape skills cost Magicka so that they can alternate between those and roll dodge seamlessly.
But let’s not give them all those things because then it would be a broken class and we’d probably see close to 40% of the cyrodil population switch to it.
Nihility42 wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »I'm thinking that if we all start insulting each other, ZOS will have to come in and close down this unimaginably stupid thread.
OP, delete your account, go play a different game, and get bent.
I hate you. You shouldn't even be playing this game you dumb, meanie
LiquidPony wrote: »Nihility42 wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »I'm thinking that if we all start insulting each other, ZOS will have to come in and close down this unimaginably stupid thread.
OP, delete your account, go play a different game, and get bent.
I hate you. You shouldn't even be playing this game you dumb, meanie
Why, you stuck-up, half-witted, scruffy-looking nerf herder!
For sure Nightblades are the new Sorcerers from One Tamriel but improved... Even the game play is easier now, and no other magicka class can come close. Every class can barelly hit 33k self on 6m skeleton... Nbs can hit 41k...
SydneyGrey wrote: »Stop asking for nerfs, people.
Threads like this are the reason we've had nothing but nerfs to all classes for the past year. Stop this nonsense.
Half the NB abilities are stilled bugged, so why is everyone so butt hurt about NBs finally being competitive? It's been years since they could contend with other dps builds.
- Update 23Ice Furnace: This item set now grants Spell Damage, rather than Weapon Damage for the 4 piece bonus
magictucktuck wrote: »
You didn't specify what exactly to bring down. Keep in mind Nightblades are pretty poor in end game PvE, we don't want to worsen that.
Because sorc mains dont like being outdone in any capacity.
I still remember the overreaction of the curse nerf which got reverted because every sorc flocked too the forums to moan. Which was rediculous. Pretty much puts ZoS in the position of being unable to nerf sorc in any way at all due to them not wanting such a large outcry. Its sad.