Battleground Teams need Balancing

TarrNokk

Every 4-man group need to be organized in the players roles.
Every group must have Tank, healer and DD so it can not happen that one group has 3 wardens.

Thogard

Do you know how hard it is to find a pug healer in the BGs?

gabriebe

lol on the other hand, do you know how great it is when you pug a BG as a healer and everyone in the team is just trying to adapt to the fact that they aren't dying in 10 seconds?

Besides, people will just q for fake roles anyway.

TarrNokk

Yes, its hard to find a pug healer. But I guess if it would be separated to classes, many passionate healers would join. Fake-roles could be avoided whwn system gives you the role which your setup is typical for.

Mojomonkeyman

TarrNokk wrote: »

Yes, its hard to find a pug healer. But I guess if it would be separated to classes, many passionate healers would join. Fake-roles could be avoided whwn system gives you the role which your setup is typical for.

So, templars and wardens would only be allowed to heal? Wouldnt this bring a lot of new problems to the table? I mean, I played my magWarden exclusively with 3 dmg sets lately and I really don't care much about healing anyone. Wouldn't my setup then "block" a real healer spot?

Beardimus

Removing CP is all we need to make BG better.

Mojomonkeyman

Beardimus wrote: »

Removing CP is all we need to make BG better.

Honestly, as someone who likes noCP vastly more, I doubt this. Do you still play regularly BGs now with CP? I'm asking this, because I feel that CP pop is unfortunately still higher than it was with nonCP. Not by much, but certainly not lower than without CP on PC EU.

I played around 100 BGs a week in noCP, and play around 50-100 BGs a week now in CP (a little less, but still every day almost). So I have a pretty big sample size to draw my conclusions from. As much as I want BGs to return to noCP, to think it would also increase overall population is wishful thinking imo.

TarrNokk

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

TarrNokk wrote: »

Yes, its hard to find a pug healer. But I guess if it would be separated to classes, many passionate healers would join. Fake-roles could be avoided whwn system gives you the role which your setup is typical for.

So, templars and wardens would only be allowed to heal? Wouldnt this bring a lot of new problems to the table? I mean, I played my magWarden exclusively with 3 dmg sets lately and I really don't care much about healing anyone. Wouldn't my setup then "block" a real healer spot?

If your etup is typical for DD then you would be roled as DD.

Mihael

Unless some of these nbs start changing to healers you gonna have a hard time filling roles

INHUMANENATION

Battlegrounds isn't just about gripping and ripping. People that take time to set-up a 4 man with proper make-up and gear sets shouldn't be punished. I don't enjoy queuing solo and running into 2 hard-nosed groups but c'est le vie. When I queue up with friends we have a >90% chance of success.

Sometimes youre the fly, other times youre the windshield.

Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays!

Sixty5

OR, and this is a big or

You could maybe not run a glass cannon build, and actually build some survivability and be useful.

Anethum

TarrNokk wrote: »

Every 4-man group need to be organized in the players roles.
Every group must have Tank, healer and DD so it can not happen that one group has 3 wardens.

Dude, don't try think about pvp like it's pve with constant roles, it doesn't work in such way , partly only and problem is in any option to separate randomly grouped peoples and premades to different leagues.

GC0

PvP works unlike PvP and often you just don't need one of the roles, if you're playing a tank in PvP I am sure you're doing it wrong and well, annoyingly. I think that such idea to queue as roles is bad and it would only result in longer queue times because for primarily PvP players it wouldn't make sense and you'd need healers and tanks(which are rare in BGs) to finally queue for a Battleground. This is simply and idea which isn't thought out.