Anyone else noticed that ESO is basically one of the only MMORPGs that ISN'T blatantly sexualized? Take the title image of Naryu and the Warden. Not a single shred of bikini armor in sight. Honestly thinking about it, im impressed a little. ZOS doesnt stoop to showing big busty Templars on their ads to gain new players.
I have no issue with that.At the end of the day, Elder Scrolls has always been about freedom to put on whatever armor you desire.
victoriana-blue wrote: »There's a difference between "modest" and "not sexy."
Plus the datamined Nocturnal.. thing.
The Nocturnal costume though is keeping to canon at least. Its exactly how it was in TES:V. It may be real showy, but that particularly is just how Female preferred Princes look. (Or, were chosen to look)
Also not sure whats wrong with Naryu's unique outfit, its full covering even and looks a lot nicer than default Dunmer.
Anyone else noticed that ESO is basically one of the only MMORPGs that ISN'T blatantly sexualized? Take the title image of Naryu and the Warden. Not a single shred of bikini armor in sight. Honestly thinking about it, im impressed a little. ZOS doesnt stoop to showing big busty Templars on their ads to gain new players.
The only thing that "bothers" me about that is that ESO does so well in offering tattoos and other skins ... which are hard to see because you hardly show any skin.
Other than that it's refreshing.
TheShadowScout wrote: »I have no issue with that.At the end of the day, Elder Scrolls has always been about freedom to put on whatever armor you desire.
My issue is with wearing -one- type or armor, but displaying the visuals of a -different- type of armor.
Wearing knightly heavy plate mail while in a wedding dress.
Wearing rogueish medium armor in dancers silks.
Wearing magicians robes while in nord hero plate visuals.
Those are the things I dislike.
Now, when it is used as roleplay support in cities, to represent the characters in their "civilian garb" (without having to -actually- change your characters gear) - no issues. On the battlefield though I would prefer a "what you see is what you get" aproach...
I have no problems at all with people wearing whatever armor they desire, be it heavy armor "battlemage" type sorcerors, or "mercenary" fighters in medium armor with sword&board...
Hey all,
We've removed a few posts because they were in violation of our forum policy on nudity. Please be sure all posts follow the forums rules and stay relevant to the topic being discussed.
Thanks,
KatP
I'd welcome them adding more skimpy/sexy outfits and armor.
I find this whole fear of showing skin to be a bit old fashioned and as for armor impracticality, all female armor is impractical in ESO, it's a Fantasy game, who cares?
I'd welcome them adding more skimpy/sexy outfits and armor.
I find this whole fear of showing skin to be a bit old fashioned and as for armor impracticality, all female armor is impractical in ESO, it's a Fantasy game, who cares?
To be frank I'm sure the main reason is everyone knows there's a massive amount of young players who completely disregarded the 'M' rating and had their parent or older sibling buy the game for them. And you'd be starved to find a parent who's completely fine with letting their kid dress their female character in something skimpy and then proceed to dance for other players in Mournhold, all while playing in the Living Room.
Then again, if anything like that happens, it's their fault their kid had access in the first place, not ZOS's. And since I myself am of quite legal age and then some, I'd appreciate some eye candy as well.
Will definitely be buying that Nocturnal Costume if it hits the Crown Store.
Hey all,
We've removed a few posts because they were in violation of our forum policy on nudity. Please be sure all posts follow the forums rules and stay relevant to the topic being discussed.
Thanks,
KatP
victoriana-blue wrote: »The game has always had a slant toward carrot/power fantasy men
I'd welcome them adding more skimpy/sexy outfits and armor.
I find this whole fear of showing skin to be a bit old fashioned and as for armor impracticality, all female armor is impractical in ESO, it's a Fantasy game, who cares?
To be frank I'm sure the main reason is everyone knows there's a massive amount of young players who completely disregarded the 'M' rating and had their parent or older sibling buy the game for them. And you'd be starved to find a parent who's completely fine with letting their kid dress their female character in something skimpy and then proceed to dance for other players in Mournhold, all while playing in the Living Room.
Then again, if anything like that happens, it's their fault their kid had access in the first place, not ZOS's. And since I myself am of quite legal age and then some, I'd appreciate some eye candy as well.
Will definitely be buying that Nocturnal Costume if it hits the Crown Store.
victoriana-blue wrote: »The game has always had a slant toward carrot/power fantasy men
Nice to see you around, friend, but I'm asking for a clarification on that bit. Genuinely not sure what that means. carrot/power?
I played a show with Cat Power once. She was, much to my surprise, not a Khajiit.