Because they don't change something doesn't mean they ignored feedback.
Heck, as far as the crown store and crates do, revenue is the loudest feedback. They certainly listened to our feedback.
And the poll is clearly made to be biased. Lol.
Cha ching is great feedback. They listen very well to it.
I don't even hold it against them. They're making money this way which is entirely optional and it doesn't hamper the game in any way. I'm fine with it.
You get that these guys are running a business with the intention of making a profit, right? I would far rather they bolster revenue and earnings from OPTIONAL Crown Crate items which are ENTIRELY COSMETIC instead of increasing my ESO Plus subscription.
Where is the challenge of opening up your wallet to just buy the newest mount? Sorry but I like to actually earn things by PLAYING the game. Payment should be reserved for the lazy and impatient. The more goals you have in a game the longer it can keep your interest. If you're just logging on to throw money at something and then you're done with your goal, why even continue playing? And then when you stop playing, why continue to pay them for whatever comes out in the future? It's bad business practice plain and simple.
They completely ignored our feedback and went ahead and added even more exclusive mounts you cannot but directly with gems. Did you want a skeletal mount with fire coming out of it? Well now you can for only a few hundred dollars depending on your rng! What do you think about this!
When the entire crown crate idea was announced the overwhelming majority of players were against it, they ignored us completely. Why is it a surprise to you that they would continue to ignore negative feedback pertaining to something that they completely ignored feedback about in the first place?
You get that these guys are running a business with the intention of making a profit, right? I would far rather they bolster revenue and earnings from OPTIONAL Crown Crate items which are ENTIRELY COSMETIC instead of increasing my ESO Plus subscription.
DeadlyRecluse wrote: »Also, to preempt this thread in 3 months...
I think it's safe to assume a few super-apex, unpurchasable mounts will be in each cycle moving forward.