Because I like actual look. I think a true color of the weapon is the color of material it is made from. I'd welcome more the ability to paint my mounts or put some cool looking textures or large tattoos by which I could express my personal character.
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »Ok so when are we getting weapon dyes?
I voted no because weapons look better when they are left with realistic colours. After all, you didn't see sky-blue-pink swords and lances around in the old days, any more than there are brightly coloured guns etc these days. It would just look wrong.
Now shields are a different matter. It has always been traditional to emblazon shields with various designs, such as coats of arms.
Maybe ZOS could introduce a range of designs to put on our shields to make them look individual and decorative?
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »Because I like actual look. I think a true color of the weapon is the color of material it is made from. I'd welcome more the ability to paint my mounts or put some cool looking textures or large tattoos by which I could express my personal character.
oh is that right, what about armor dyes and shields that are all made of similar items from "true material". And guess what? All those metals can still be dyed
In addition if you knew anything about metalworking, You would know that the color of an Metal's Ore is never how it actually turns out looking after being smelted and the impurities of the metal are removed from the ore. In fact the metals color is nearly completely unrecognizable to the ore used after being worked.
Not only this But many swords of all cultures have always had the metals polished and in current and old have been dyed in the real world.
So why in a world full of magic would this be any different?
I voted no because weapons look better when they are left with realistic colours. After all, you didn't see sky-blue-pink swords and lances around in the old days, any more than there are brightly coloured guns etc these days. It would just look wrong.
Now shields are a different matter. It has always been traditional to emblazon shields with various designs, such as coats of arms.
Maybe ZOS could introduce a range of designs to put on our shields to make them look individual and decorative?
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »To sum it up for ZOS
90% logical people say yes
9% Scum say no
That 10% or less of humanities population is always a useless pain
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »To sum it up for ZOS
90% logical people say yes
9% Scum say no
That 10% or less of humanities population is always a useless pain
I rather object to your tone Nelson-Rebel. The 10% who happen to hold a different view to your's are neither 'scum', not a 'useless pain'.
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »To sum it up for ZOS
90% logical people say yes
9% Scum say no
That 10% or less of humanities population is always a useless pain
I rather object to your tone Nelson-Rebel. The 10% who happen to hold a different view to your's are neither 'scum', not a 'useless pain'.
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »To sum it up for ZOS
90% logical people say yes
9% Scum say no
That 10% or less of humanities population is always a useless pain
I rather object to your tone Nelson-Rebel. The 10% who happen to hold a different view to your's are neither 'scum', not a 'useless pain'.
WTS sense of humor
I really want to dye maelstrom D1LDO staves, they are so ugly maybe a different colour would make them better.
RainfeatherUK wrote: »Weapons do not fit under that description and aren't of the design/scale to hold color.
RainfeatherUK wrote: »Oh please. Your attitude sucks Nelson, wind your neck in jerk. People like you are about as funny as hole in a boat. I.e nada.
What Aurelle said is on point, you however seem too dim to understand that armor and heraldry was always dyed historically. Weapons do not fit under that description and aren't of the design/scale to hold color. They had ornate design, sometimes outfitted with detailing on the grip/guard. Thats it for practical arms.
What kind of fool would detail a live blade with color. when by design its designed to take and dish out physical impact? And then need retreating/forging and sharpening?
Yawn. I thought I was bad. Your smugness is off the charts.
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »Because I like actual look. I think a true color of the weapon is the color of material it is made from. I'd welcome more the ability to paint my mounts or put some cool looking textures or large tattoos by which I could express my personal character.
oh is that right, what about armor dyes and shields that are all made of similar items from "true material". And guess what? All those metals can still be dyed
In addition if you knew anything about metalworking, You would know that the color of an Metal's Ore is never how it actually turns out looking after being smelted and the impurities of the metal are removed from the ore. In fact the metals color is nearly completely unrecognizable to the ore used after being worked.
Not only this But many swords of all cultures have always had the metals polished and in current and old have been dyed in the real world.
So why in a world full of magic would this be any different?
I voted no because weapons look better when they are left with realistic colours. After all, you didn't see sky-blue-pink swords and lances around in the old days, any more than there are brightly coloured guns etc these days. It would just look wrong.
Now shields are a different matter. It has always been traditional to emblazon shields with various designs, such as coats of arms.
Maybe ZOS could introduce a range of designs to put on our shields to make them look individual and decorative?
Thrymbauld wrote: »After all, in the old days you didn't see red swords. Red. Swords.
Thrymbauld wrote: »After all, in the old days you didn't see red swords. Red. Swords.