Callous2208 wrote: »Is this another one of those, "I don't care for this DLC as it does not fit my playstyle and everyone who does like it is stupid and wrong," type of threads?
Callous2208 wrote: »Is this another one of those, "I don't care for this DLC as it does not fit my playstyle and everyone who does like it is stupid and wrong," type of threads?
Yeah... Except it wasn't worded half as eloquently. He pretty much made vague remarks about "it sucks because it sucks" and now he's arguing with everyone that likes it because it fits their playstyle.
OP, I personally like it too. So much of everything else in ESO was so heavily wrapped around combat, it's nice they added some DLC that made good use of non-combat, but still somewhat challenging and strategy oriented, content.
Given the genre of game that ESO is, I think they managed to implement it pretty well.
It's just not for everyone I guess, but I don't think calling "poo" (really?) is in the slightest way rational either.
Agree worst so far try being a Templar sneaking around like a wanna be nightblade. It sucks I'm awful at sneaking.
Khaos_Bane wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »Is this another one of those, "I don't care for this DLC as it does not fit my playstyle and everyone who does like it is stupid and wrong," type of threads?
Yeah... Except it wasn't worded half as eloquently. He pretty much made vague remarks about "it sucks because it sucks" and now he's arguing with everyone that likes it because it fits their playstyle.
OP, I personally like it too. So much of everything else in ESO was so heavily wrapped around combat, it's nice they added some DLC that made good use of non-combat, but still somewhat challenging and strategy oriented, content.
Given the genre of game that ESO is, I think they managed to implement it pretty well.
It's just not for everyone I guess, but I don't think calling "poo" (really?) is in the slightest way rational either.
Yeah it's just preference really. The only DLC I have really liked so far is Orsinium. I thought IC was absolutely horrible though some like it, and TG was just small and underwhelming.
Skyrim's Thieves Guild had more plot holes than plot, didn't involve any stealing and was actually a poorly disguised Daedric questline. Don't talk to me about bad writing.HighT3chR3dn3ck wrote: »DerAlleinTiger wrote: »Personally, I absolutely love this DLC's story. The characters are great and I adore their personal stories and quests. Velsa and Walks-Softly alone made the DLC worthwhile for me. And I'm not even the sort of person who normally plays thief characters!
However, the requirement of TG rank to unlock the story quests is pretty sour. It worked for Fighters Guild and Mages Guild in the base game because you have an entire zone between the quests to level up those skill lines. If you were doing all the dolmens and picking up most of the lore books as you go along, you wouldn't even notice it. For a long time I didn't even know about it! But with the Thieves Guild you can do them all at once and the stories make you want to do them all at once. Having to absolutely halt the storyline to do 5 or 6 repeatable quests just ruins the continuity and flow of the storyline.
All that being said, once I did get to the quests I loved them. ZOS's writers make some fantastic characters. I thought they'd outdone themselves with Drake of Blades, but Velsa hit me right in the feels. (Her story was also eerily similar to the story of one of my RP characters so I do have some bias there.)
Are you kidding me? Firstly, this is by far the worst story telling of the three Elder Scrolls games I've played.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »take this as a friendly suggestion....NEVER buy DLC without trying it first. Use ESO plus to test it out....if you dont like it, use the crowns elsewhere.