This game would be better off without Cyrodiil

Lysette

DurzoBlint13 wrote: »

I bought this game I made a statement that I would never get into its PvP side......but I was running a stam sorc and NEEDED Vigor! Lol So I went in to Cyrodil very reluctantly. During the grind to get it, I started to have a change of heart. The more I PvP'd, the better I got. The better I got, the more I enjoyed doing it. The more I enjoyed it, the more time I spent at it. So after starting as a PvE-only-guy I am now close to a PvP-only-guy. My point is that if you never try something how can you know if you will like it or not? The grind to get skills like Vigor is a large part of why the PvP crowd continues to grow. Some will grind it out and never come back to Cyrodil after they get what they want. While a lager portion (like myself) come to grind and end up falling in love with an aspect we never even wanted to try. I still suck at PvP but I know enough now to at least enjoy myself most of time.

I like this, because you tried, even you were against PvP at first. I do not like PvP by reasons, which are mainly about role play aspects, but I will give PvP in ESO a serious try and see if I can enjoy it. I hope that in the siege mechanics is some kind of role play which I could enjoy, but this is a guess, I will have to try it - and I will give it a fair try, not going into it with prejudice.

kirk_lewis_ESO

Wait a minute. Empty campaigns? No pvpers or creepy roleplayers (saw a bunch of them running around a fountain in glenumbra naked. That was it for me) ? I've been avoiding Cyrodiil because well, Templar, but I'll check out these are empty campaigns.

ZOS_MollyH

Hey all, despite the request from a moderator to remain constructive, this thread has gotten off topic again. As there are now several pages of great discussion, we're going to lock it to refrain from continuing to bait arguments.