TheShadowScout wrote: »I see no problem with those costumes. Yes, they are a bit more renaissance-ish then middle-age-ish... but that's still within the scope of fantasy themed outfits. Though I -would- have hoped they might put those visuals on some random "noble" NPCs here and there to set the stage... and maybe "model" their costumes... oh, well, maybe some patch in the future...
KiraTsukasa wrote: »Do... do they have to fit lore?
That's what I was thinking too. These two could easily fit into the outfits of something like Breton nobility, whereas the pumpkin has no lore basis whatsoever.Compared to what's coming (pumpkin and scarecrow costumes) these clothes are a better fit and not near as lore breaking.
A wedding dress isn't formal wear, it's good only for one very specific occasion, so our only real dress hasn't been in the crown store "for months" (it was released in late July).The two images you've linked I'm actually very pleased about. They had feminine formalwear for months, and now it looks like we will finally (eventually, they are datamined) be getting some masculine ones. None of my characters, regardless of gender, will wear bulky dresses with long trails.
lordrichter wrote: »KiraTsukasa wrote: »Do... do they have to fit lore?
Edit: They need to be something that reflects what is in the game. That alone would make them lore friendly.
I will cry if this costume doesn't make it to the crown store in the upcoming DLC.
Because the rest of us have to look at your fun. I don't care if you ride a motorcycle and wield a lightsaber in your modded Skyrim, but when I'm forced to play alongside you and watch, I'm suddenly very concerned about lore-friendliness of your "fun" features.KiraTsukasa wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »KiraTsukasa wrote: »Do... do they have to fit lore?
Edit: They need to be something that reflects what is in the game. That alone would make them lore friendly.
Why, though? Why does EVERYTHING have to fit lore? Why can't someone just have fun with the game?
Because of the amount of effort the devs at Bethesda have put into it (creating a fully-realised, detailed history, over 3000 years, of the entire world) lore is very important to many fans of the Elder Scrolls series. For someone trying to document the lore (including devs for the future games), things that happen in-game are canon, so introducing something like a pumpkin costume with no lore basis trivialises all that effort into gimmicks and jokes, and the respect that the devs have garnered for their world is damaged; for some, irreparably.KiraTsukasa wrote: »Why, though? Why does EVERYTHING have to fit lore? Why can't someone just have fun with the game?lordrichter wrote: »KiraTsukasa wrote: »Do... do they have to fit lore?
Edit: They need to be something that reflects what is in the game. That alone would make them lore friendly.
KiraTsukasa wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »KiraTsukasa wrote: »Do... do they have to fit lore?
Edit: They need to be something that reflects what is in the game. That alone would make them lore friendly.
Why, though? Why does EVERYTHING have to fit lore? Why can't someone just have fun with the game?